Gun Control Pros And Cons Essay

1701 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: A brief paragraph about the second amendment

GUNS For as long as the American Constitution has been in place there has been some kind of fight or argument against our second amendment. The actual second amendment states, “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” (www.law.cornell.edu). Apparently our forefathers believed that we the people have the right to bear arms because it is necessary to the security of this nation’s freedom. Also, it states that this second amendment should never be taken away because it is a right of the people. These days the debate on gun control is more discussed and is as complicated as ever. Many democrats are trying to limit gun control or even strip the second amendment right out of the constitution while republicans are trying to keep what our forefathers wanted intact. While this debate will continue to go on for quite some time, there is a right way to approach this situation and a wrong way. Sure, there may be pros and cons of certain situations or laws that could be eventually brought to the forefront for American citizens to vote on. However, there is only one right path to take when it comes to gun control; leave the second amendment alone. When it comes to gun control, gun violence is something that always tends to be brought up into the discussion. Yes, gun violence is a horrible thing but the second amendment is not the reason that gun violence occurs. CEO of the National Rifle Association, Wayne LaPierre stated that, “The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun.” LaPierre made these statements after the tragic shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut in December of 2012. There ... ... middle of paper ... ...e prohibition of alcohol only lasted about thirteen years. We should take the prohibition of alcohol as a lesson and use it to our advantage when it comes to gun control. If we outlaw guns, or repeal the second amendment things could only become worse. Organized crime would rise tremendously like it did during prohibition. Daniel Florien claimed that, “Similarly, organized crime continues today because of the prohibition on gambling, prostitution, and drugs. Where there is demand, there will be supply” (patheos.com). The demand for guns will go up tremendously if there was a repealing of the second amendment. Gun trafficking would be a problem that we the people would have to encounter as well. The second amendment is there for the people. We should not repeal it because of the lessons we’ve learned in the history of prohibiting alcohol, and repealing an amendment.

Show More
Related

  • Gun Control Is Unconstitutional

    1058 Words  | 3 Pages

    We are entitled to the right to bear arms and taking that right away would be unconstitutional. Guns are not the cause for all the violence and crimes that have happened over the years. They do not increase the death rates. Children are more likely to die in a car or swimming pool accident then gun related deaths (VerBruggen). The weapons are needed for protection and hunting, owning a gun is not unconstitutional Taking the Second Amendment away or changing it would be unconstitutional and Un American, It is like any other right. This right is one of the reasons why we are the land of the free and home of the brave. “Any society that will give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both” - Benjamin Franklin

    Read More

  • The Controversy of the Second Amendment of the Constitution

    997 Words  | 2 Pages

    The way that an individual interprets the wording of the Second Amendment influences their point of view on who has the right to "keep and bear arms" (Amendment 2). The controversy brought on by the Second Amendment is because the Second Amendment does not clearly define whom "the people" are. This ambiguity has left room for action by legislative bodies and the courts to pass laws and make interpretations that influence the way this Amendment is applied and enforced. The Second Amendment says, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed." (Amendment 2).

    Read More

  • The Pros and Cons of Gun Control

    1648 Words  | 4 Pages

    This essay will discuss the pros and cons of gun control. Some U.S. States have already adopted some of these gun control laws. I will be talking about the 2nd amendment, public safety, home safety, and do gun control laws really control guns. I hope after you have read this you will be more educated, and can pick your side of the gun control debate. So keep reading and find out more about the gun control laws that the federal and some state governments want to enforce on U.S. Citizens.

    Read More

  • Gun Ownership and its Impact on Crime Rates

    567 Words  | 2 Pages

    Some people think that states that allow citizens to carry guns only raises the crime rate in that state. Studies have actually shown that states that allow citizens to carry guns actually have a lower crime rate. States that allow citizens to carry guns have actually shown to lower murder rates from 5.6 killings per 100,000 people to 4.2.

    Read More

  • Revisiting the 2nd Amendment: A Modern Debate

    840 Words  | 2 Pages

    Should the 2nd Amendment be revoked or changed? Many Americans would say “No,” stating that guns are dangerous and times have changed. Others might argue that having the right to bear arms keeps people safe and less threatened by the outside world. In this debate, both sides of the 2nd Amendment constitutional rights will be argued. The upcoming presidential election has been influencing voters to revoke our 2nd amendment rights, which could change the democracy on which our country was founded.

    Read More

  • Informative Essay: Guns and Teen Violence and Death

    616 Words  | 2 Pages

    Everyone in the United States of America has an opinion on gun control regardless of their age, race, or religion. From within those opinions arguments are formed. People are arguing about gun control at their jobs, at their schools, and sometimes at their places of worship. On one side of things there are the people that support gun control like certain politicians or political organizations, teachers, police officers, and so on. On the other side of things there are the people that are against gun control, people such as hunters and various types of criminals. When it comes down to sensitive topics like gun control, there are very few people that do not choose a side. The Second Amendment, like all Amendments that constitute the Bill of Rights, is not absolute. There are vague legal boundaries that have been set down thus far which answers some questions, but leave many more open (Sanders).

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: Is Gun Control Good Or Bad?

    1063 Words  | 3 Pages

    Gun control, in and of itself, is not evil or even a bad idea. The biggest issue is that, for the most part, it is not particularly successful.

    Read More

  • Against Gun Control Essay

    1601 Words  | 4 Pages

    Gun control is a highly controversial topic in today’s world where the fight is between the liberal and the conservatives. Many people believe that guns should be banned due to many recent massacres that have happened whereas others are wanting people to have background checks done before owning a gun. I am against gun control because banning handguns in the United States should not be allowed because handguns fail to protect the people and it is ineffective.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: Should Handgun Ownership Be Banned

    358 Words  | 1 Pages

    The second amendment says, "A well regulated militia being necessary to security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." The second amendment was made for two things. It is there for first, to guarantee the individuals right to have arms for self-defense and self-preservation. The second reason is related to the militia. The right to carry a handgun for self-protection is a privilege of citizenship. The confusion is the right of the state or the individual. The regulation of handguns could be looked at as unconstitutional. The amendment is for the people and not the state.

    Read More

  • The Second Amendment - The Right To Bear Arms

    2184 Words  | 5 Pages

    Throughout the years there has been an ongoing debate over the Second Amendment and how it should be interpreted. The issue that is being debated is whether our government has the right to regulate guns. The answer of who has which rights lies within how one interprets the Second Amendment. With this being the case, one must also think about what circumstances the Framers were under when this Amendment was written. There are two major sides to this debate, one being the collective side, which feels that the right was given for collective purposes only. This side is in favor of having stricter gun control laws, as they feel that by having stricter laws the number of crimes that are being committed with guns will be reduced and thus save lives. However while gun control laws may decrease criminals’ access to guns, the same laws restricts gun owning citizens who abide by the law; these citizens make up a great majority of the opposing side of this argument. These people argue that the law was made with the individual citizens in mind. This group believes that the Amendment should be interpreted to guarantee citizens free access to firearms. One major group that is in strong opposition of stricter gun control laws is the National Rifle Association (NRA). The NRA argues that having stricter gun control laws will only hinder law-abiding citizens. The final outcome on this debate will mainly depend on how this Amendment is going to be interpreted.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Gun Control

    877 Words  | 2 Pages

    The second Amendment states, “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right to bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” This is one of the amendments that uplifted our amazing country. The right to bear arms is an American quality that is strong to build dour nation. Why try to take this away? Gun control policies are an arising problem that the united states face. Taking away guns is not going to prevent major mass shooting, guns are needed for personal safety, and sport shooting is a major industry and community that united states citizens do for a living.

    Read More

  • The Second Amendment of the Constitution

    503 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Second Amendment      “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” This timeless phrase, the Second Amendment of the United States’ Constitution, is an enduring example of the principles and ideals that our country was founded on. With this statement, the founders of this country explicitly and perpetually guaranteed the American individual the right to keep and bear arms. An incomparably crucial element of this country‘s origins, the Second Amendment and the rights it guarantees have proved vital to the growth and success of our nation. The Second Amendment has often been the subject of debate, and over the years varying speculations and interpretations of its intended meaning have forced this significant phrase into a controversial spotlight.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On The 2nd Amendment

    1014 Words  | 3 Pages

    Gun violence in America has escalated drastically over the years. But it seems the only time we are outraged about the shootings or abuse of the 2nd Amendment is when there is a massacre of innocent people or a cop misusing his power and killing an innocent black person. “There have been at least 110 mass shootings in the US since 2009 at least 33 of which occurred in a public place” (TJF). After the vigils and outcries for change for change that fall on deaf ears, the problem is ignored and the abuse of the 2nd Amendment continues. There is no reform but instead there is another battle between the NRA, Congress, and the President of the United States. Gun regulation is constantly debated and is a very subjective topic because of the differing

    Read More

  • Gun Control Does NOT Reduce Crime

    2312 Words  | 5 Pages

    There is no single answer to end the debate on gun control. Many variables must be examined but the evidence presented cannot be ignored. Gun control does not end violence, but makes the law-abiding citizens more vulnerable. In the 1878 Arkansas case of Wilson v. State, a judge stated, “Common sense dictates that inanimate objects, such as guns, are not responsible for human behavior. We don’t hold a match responsible for arson or a camera responsible for pornography. We rightly hold the people who misuse these tools liable. The same should be true for guns.”

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay against Gun Control

    1693 Words  | 4 Pages

    Gun control is an awfully big issue in the United States today. Many people in America don’t agree with the gun control laws that they have today. Gun control laws only take guns and freedom away from law-abiding citizens. Many citizens have their own reasons for owning a gun. Why would the government want to make it harder for people to own a gun? People that own guns aren’t very likely to be attacked by criminals. Owning a handgun is one of the best ways of protection when used correctly. The second amendment states “the right to bear arms”; does this grant everyone the right to own a gun? Gun control laws have not been proven to do anything for citizens. Gun control laws just make it harder for the good guy average Joe to own a gun. Gun control laws are not a good idea, and are taking part in the loss of our freedom that was given to us.

    Read More

More about Gun Control Pros And Cons Essay

Open Document