Gun control is an issue that is very public in our society and, therefore, it must be addressed. This is the first step of the policy making process. The issue of gun control causes many heated arguments and easily demands the attention of interests groups, such as the NRA (National Rifle Association). This is both a good thing and a bad thing. People who advocate for stricter laws concerning firearms often have sensible reasons and statistics to back up their reasoning while individuals in favor of more lenient laws concerning guns usually respond with a statement reaffirming their right to carry a gun as a citizen of the United States. Sonya Sotomayor said it best, “To succeed in this world, you have to be known to people” (2013, 218-219). …show more content…
This is key to having any policy passed and made law in our government. At this step the problems are discussed and debated over. This usually results in the formation of a bill. Once it has been debated and processed into a bill it can be brought before congress. The cons of this nonetheless are that this could take a very long time. Gun control is a controversial topic that many people have strong opinions on and it is this that will cause the issue to be debated over and over again until it comes to a majority. The benefits of this are that once most have come to an agreement, in the House of Representatives as well as in the Senate, the policy will benefit most and also will have been thoroughly reviewed before it can go any farther. The steps it takes to get through Congress means that both houses have to pass the bill. Then after the bill has been signed it can be sent to the president for him to either sign or reject the …show more content…
This is when policies are put into action by government agencies and given the goal to make the policy work. This takes the form of agencies writing regulations, setting rules, and signing agreements with other agencies to implement the new policy. Just like in the case of adopting a policy in this step it might fall apart. If the people in charge of implementing the new policy choose not to enforce it then everything it can fail. In relation to gun control this is especially important because of the controversy surrounding the issue, and the buttons that are pushed when the topic is brought up, the individuals in charge of implementing the policy can simply let it fall to the wayside. An upside to this, however, is that some people feel very strongly over this issue, people with previous experiences and ideas regarding gun control, and may push through this barrier so that the policy will be put in place. It is important to understand that, “Taken as a whole, these various components (laws, regulations, executive orders, agency actions, and so on) form the government’s policy” (Barbour and Wright,
Gun control is an important issue in the United States. The big issue with gun control is some people want stricter gun laws. On the other side of the argument people that supports the usage of a firearm thinks that it is an individual’s right under the Second Amendment and guns are needed for self-defense.
Throughout the years there has been an ongoing debate over the Second Amendment and how it should be interpreted. The issue that is being debated is whether our government has the right to regulate guns. The answer of who has which rights lies within how one interprets the Second Amendment. With this being the case, one must also think about what circumstances the Framers were under when this Amendment was written. There are two major sides to this debate, one being the collective side, which feels that the right was given for collective purposes only. This side is in favor of having stricter gun control laws, as they feel that by having stricter laws the number of crimes that are being committed with guns will be reduced and thus save lives. However while gun control laws may decrease criminals’ access to guns, the same laws restricts gun owning citizens who abide by the law; these citizens make up a great majority of the opposing side of this argument. These people argue that the law was made with the individual citizens in mind. This group believes that the Amendment should be interpreted to guarantee citizens free access to firearms. One major group that is in strong opposition of stricter gun control laws is the National Rifle Association (NRA). The NRA argues that having stricter gun control laws will only hinder law-abiding citizens. The final outcome on this debate will mainly depend on how this Amendment is going to be interpreted.
The Gun Control problem in the United States of America is all because of the problem that we have with people not knowing how to use a gun, and the safety. The reason the laws are being brought to legislation is make sure that we protect our second amendment. Make sure that every American has the same right a bear a weapon, no matter the age but if they are fit to own a weapon.
At present there are numerous regulations and restrictions on firearms imposed by the government. However there are no national mandated requirements or all encompassing legislation. The laws in place vary from state to state and are in some cases are poorly enforced. Hard evidence as to the effectiveness of these present regulations is ambiguous. The question as to how the government and society deals with gun control is unique to the USA. In a complex issue such as gun control both sides of the equation have valid arguments to be h...
Gun control is an issue that is constantly being debated. There are people who are pro gun control and those who believe gun control is unconstitutional to the citizens. Many political leaders and organizations have strong opinions on gun control, which keeps the gun control debate publicized. Gun control is limiting or taking the right of citizens to carry or purchase a gun. Guns are used for protecting the citizens by police officers and the military, as well as for many personal reasons like hunting and self-defense. There are times that guns are used for the wrong reasons like murder, or put in the wrong hands which lead to accidental deaths. Choosing a stand on gun control can be hard, but hearing both sides can help a person make a decision.
Gun control is a topic that stirs a strong opinion from the general public. Gun control is the effort to regulate or control usage and sales of guns. The right to bear arms is granted to all Americans by the Second Amendment and many consider it essential to maintain order in the United States of America. Even though this was the Second Amendment right granted to citizens in the Bill of Rights, many Americans opt not to own a gun, and others would like for this right to be abolished altogether. Both sides of this issue have a good argument, but when further researched, there are many more details that come up explain why siding against gun control is a better conclusion for the United States and its people. Some may say gun control should be enforced because it will make the pubic a safer place to be and decrease gun violence. “An average of eight children and teens under the age of twenty are killed by guns every day" ("Brady Campaign to prevent Gun Violence", 2012). The United States' current president, Barack Obama, is currently working on enforcing and passing more laws and legislation to protect the families and the citizens of the United States. The successful enforcement of our current laws would be a major stride toward decreasing the amount of crimes committed with guns and the amount of criminals with gun possession. The most challenging element of the gun control debate is whether existing gun laws are adequate or whether more gun laws need to be created and enforced.
The National Rifle Association (NRA), recognized today as a major political force and as America's foremost defender of the Second Amendment, “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a Free State the Right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” The NRA adheres to the belief that the Second Amendment guarantees the right of individuals to bear arms. Recent U.S. Supreme Court cases have confirmed those beliefs. In spite of whether one personally adheres to these interpretations of the amendment or not, the fact is there are over two hundred million guns in this country. Moreover, there are over seventy-five million firearm owners. In addition to the NRA’s political activity for second amendment rights, it has fulfilled a service, as since its inception, it had been the premier firearms education organization in the world by providing firearms safety and training.
Central in the arguments against gun control is its ability to restrict any citizen of the United States the right to own guns which is protected under the constitution. Specifically, due recognition is made to its connection to the 2nd Amendment wherein it seeks to protect the individual liberties of people. This facet also applies to gun ownership regardless of the original objective and intention. “The second amendment from the Bill of Rights grants private citizens the right to bear arms. Thus, people who stand firmly against gun control insist that no legislation, technically, should have the right to take away a citizen’s guns without first repealing the amendment in question” (Groberman 1). A good approach to consider in highlighting this part comes from depriving the citizen of his basic right on the basis of specific presumption that it would be used for violence or crim...
When it comes to controversial topics in today’s society, there are so many that it can be difficult to be a straight shooter. Among all of them, however, debate over gun control has been prevalent for so long, it is something many people can easily set their sights on. It is an issue everybody should have an opinion on, as it is vastly important, potentially threatening, and all too present in modern society. Many find the mere concept of gun control invasive to their constitutional rights, while others see lack of gun control to be astoundingly dangerous and entirely chimerical. Protection of oneself and their rights may or may not be more important than hundreds of lives lost potentially due to fairly unrestricted gun ownership. The mere question would bring many to ear-shattering debate, and for good reason. Screams of constitutional neglect and of humanistic lethargy would likely be heard miles away. This debate would be very much on target though, as there are many valid points from either side and it is a topic that must be thought out very carefully to avoid potential catastrophe. Recent events leading to deaths of many American citizens enough to dictate the need for stricter gun control, although such action may really be meaningless and infringe upon the core rights established by the country’s founders themselves, meaning some values of gun control may help, but ultimately it is a futile attempt.
If the government acts in a manifest function and decides to loosen gun laws in order to help people protect themselves, it can lead to a latent dysfunction where guns can be reachable to anyone and more accidents will be prone to occur. On the other hand, if the government decides to enforce strict gun control, people will then think of it as them being stripped of their American right to bare arms and hence protests will be made.
“A gun is a tool. It has no emotion or feelings. It cannot make decisions or take action. It does not know hate. It does not discriminate, take sides, or judge others. It is morally neutral. It is no better or worse than any other tool. A gun has no action without a user. Remember that” -Anonymous. As our world seems to grow increasingly violent, and mass shootings seem commonplace, many government leaders are pushing for certain gun laws that would ban the public from owning firearms of any sort. This is wrong, because as United States citizens, we have the right to bear arms. Despite a recent increase in gun violence within the United States, government leaders should not create laws which would restrict gun usage, should it involve magazine capacity, concealed carry, or the eradication of assault weapons for the public.
In this day and age, gun control is a major topic of debate in the United States. Many people believe that gun control is the solution to ending violent crimes in the United States while others believe that gun control will only make the situation worse. There are three main causes of the gun control debate that spark public interest in the subject: school shootings, political attention, and gun control laws.
Throughout the course of history, the gun control debate has been an issue that has been dealt with since the age of the colonial Americans and it is also being disputed today. The US currently holds over 200 million guns and has weaker gun laws in comparison to other developed nations, mostly because the Supreme Court has advocated gun control rights. Not many actions were taken until numerous gun shootings and incidents revolving around guns have occurred. These incidents have aroused a pleading to pass gun control laws, but the Supreme Court is against passing of the laws. Although the Supreme Court considers it unnecessary to have them, recent tragedies and past instances clearly support the implication of gun control laws.
Gun control has also been a vastly debated issue for the last couple of years. Congress has continued to dispute the effectiveness and reasons for the federal ruling of firearms and ammunition. There are strong advocates arguing those who are for and against gun control. The matter of gun control and gun rights has remained a matter of discussion in the White House. This has been boasted around in the Congress meetings. According to the then – Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (ATF), “Virtually, every crime gun in the United States starts off as a legal firearm” (ATF), (Parnell,
The agenda setting process begins by determining who decides what is to be decided. On the gun control issue the groups involved are Illinois government officials and national advocacy groups like the National Rifle Association (NRA), the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, the Center to Prevent Handgun Violence and Handgun Control, Inc., political candidates, professional organizations, and the media. In order to build an agenda the analyst needs to understand how policy is made and how policy is implemented. In researching advocacy pages I was able to retrieve information on the mission of the N...