Gun Control is the topic of the report. This topic, gun control, is one of the most controversial issues with American politics today. This report will analyze gun control in our country today, as well as, evaluate whether guns should be banned. The report will include our second amendment, past and present gun control laws, key facts and reasons for having a gun. It will also cover arguments supporting gun control and arguments against gun control include the infringement on the second amendment. Valid arguments supporting gun control include decreased deaths and crime rate. Interesting survey results and interview feedback will also be covered. Lastly, the report will discuss the deadliest shootings in the United States and my recommendations on this topic. In conclusion Laws are currently in place but they are not being enforced by our government. If government is willing to enforce their laws, then citizens will abide by the laws.
Gun control has also been a vastly debated issue for the last couple of years. Congress has continued to dispute the effectiveness and reasons for the federal ruling of firearms and ammunition. There are strong advocates arguing those who are for and against gun control. The matter of gun control and gun rights has remained a matter of discussion in the White House. This has been boasted around in the Congress meetings. According to the then – Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (ATF), “Virtually, every crime gun in the United States starts off as a legal firearm” (ATF), (Parnell,
As defined by U.S. Legal, gun control laws are “aim to restrict or regulate the sale, purchase, or possession of firearms through licensing, registration, or identification requirements” (US Legal). Gun control is enacted in hopes that it will decrease the amount of gun violence that occurs. Most gun control laws proceed after tragic events, such as Sandy Hook, the Columbine Shooting, and recent terrorists attacks. However, as history has presented itself in countries that have extreme gun control laws there are pros and cons to it. As a result of different cultures and views, the results of gun control vary from country to country. The problem in America is determining what would work best, which is what both political parties or active groups argue
The National Rifle Association has huge number of allies and members in the nation. Therefore, the NRA has much power and influence on the American political system, and thus, the American citizens. According to John M. Buchanan, in his article “Gun Madness,” that discusses gun violence in the United States, the NRA has persuades millions of people that any kind of restriction on private gun ownership is the beginning for its revocation (2). The NRA and its followers strongly opposes any kind of gun control such as any limitation of numbers of the weapons that can be purchased, any restriction on the type of the guns and almost every attempt of rational background checks or licensing (2). Widespread of the weapons poses a threat to people's lives. Buchanan suggests that gun control is a critical issue that needs to be soberly addressed with the same diligence that is set in establishing rules for driving a vehicle. Because, no community will be pleased by letting somebody to be able to drive as fast as 200 miles per hour on any road, this speed is restricted to the city roads (2). The NRA is always able and ready to fight the restrictions on gun ownership, because of the fact that its membership base is large and the power that it has. Moreover, the NRA supporters always react, whenever there is a bill...
Gun control is a hot-button issue that boils over whenever acts of gun violence occur, such as the recent tragedy in Paris. Citizens, lawmakers, and gun lobbyists have been debating the issue of gun control for more than a century, and there has yet to be a definitive answer. Advocates of gun control don’t believe that state and federal gun control acts do enough, and gun rights advocates believe that the laws go too far. Opponents of gun control laws argue that Americans have the right to bear arms that it’s their right. They say that gun control laws would help individuals defend themselves and their property lawfully, as well as supporting the rights of hunters, sports shooters, and recreational gunmen. While the advocates
In this day and age, gun control is a major topic of debate in the United States. Many people believe that gun control is the solution to ending violent crimes in the United States while others believe that gun control will only make the situation worse. There are three main causes of the gun control debate that spark public interest in the subject: school shootings, political attention, and gun control laws.
In recent times, gun violence and gun control have been a major topic covered by nearly all news outlets. Many people have differing opinions about what the United States should do with their Gun Control Policies. Should they be left as they are or should there be new regulations to attempt to curtail violence in America? Would laws stop crime; in other words, do criminals abide by the law? Many news outlets cover the topic of gun control differently. Special interest groups also have a large influence on the view of gun control. The abundance of media attention and special interest groups greatly affects the publics’ opinion of gun control.
Throughout the course of history, the gun control debate has been an issue that has been dealt with since the age of the colonial Americans and it is also being disputed today. The US currently holds over 200 million guns and has weaker gun laws in comparison to other developed nations, mostly because the Supreme Court has advocated gun control rights. Not many actions were taken until numerous gun shootings and incidents revolving around guns have occurred. These incidents have aroused a pleading to pass gun control laws, but the Supreme Court is against passing of the laws. Although the Supreme Court considers it unnecessary to have them, recent tragedies and past instances clearly support the implication of gun control laws.
However, the NRA understands how the “potato chip” theory of gun control will grow until it tests the very foundation of our Bill of Rights. Former head of the NRA, Harlon Carter, warned: “It is a little nibble first, and I’ll bet you can’t eat just one” (Crooker, xi). The NRA is correct in that sense. The media is rife with politicians proposing more and more gun control legislation and laws, and yes, revising or amending the Constitution. Former Supreme Court Justice, John Paul Stevens, recommended: “Changing the Second Amendment to make clear that only a state 's militia, not its citizens, has a constitutional right to bear arms” (Wolf, 2014). Yet, the effectiveness of gun control laws has never proven conclusive. Statistics touted by both sides of the debate frequently clash. In January of 2013 President, Barack Obama commissioned the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) to study gun control laws. The CDC found “insufficient evidence” of “bans on specified firearms or ammunition; acquisition restrictions; waiting periods for firearm acquisition; firearm registration and licensing of firearm owners; shall issue concealed weapon carry laws; child access prevention laws; zero tolerance of firearms in schools; and combinations of firearms laws” (“Violence,” 419). Still, politicians and gun rights groups continue their crusade to infringe upon “the right
Gun control policies regulate the manufacture, sale, transfer, possession and use of firearms. In The United States the issue of gun control has been a hot topic for many years. The second amendment to the constitution "the right of the people to keep and bear arms" means that individuals may own guns, not just police and military however; Democratic lawmakers believe this may not be the way the amendment was intended to be interpreted. One problem with this issue is determining the rights of the people as they were intended by our forefathers. Since 1791 Americans have had the right to keep and bear arms, the misuse and illegal acts of criminals have brought this right under “fire”. In January 2004, three authors reprinted and analyzed dozens of Supreme Court cases that have referenced the Second Amendment. Their conclusion? "These cases suggest that the Justices of the Supreme Court do now and usually have regarded the Second Amendment ‘right of the people to keep and bear arms’ as an individual right, rather than as a right of state governments." (Kopel, 2014) Everywhere you look in America, people are trying to make life safer and then the latest massacre happens and we say “that’s America”. Would a ban on fire arms for the public decrease the number of firearm deaths and keep the people safer? Do we need tighter restrictions on gun ownership? “The most powerful time to communicate is when concern and emotions are running at their peak,” “The debate over gun violence in America is periodically punctuated by high-profile gun violence incidents including Columbine, Virginia Tech, Tucson, the Trayvon Martin killing, Aurora and Oak Creek. When an incident such as these attracts sustained media attention, it creates a unique cli...
The agenda setting process begins by determining who decides what is to be decided. On the gun control issue the groups involved are Illinois government officials and national advocacy groups like the National Rifle Association (NRA), the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, the Center to Prevent Handgun Violence and Handgun Control, Inc., political candidates, professional organizations, and the media. In order to build an agenda the analyst needs to understand how policy is made and how policy is implemented. In researching advocacy pages I was able to retrieve information on the mission of the N...
Gun Control in the United States of America is a topic that has had some criticism and support by many citizens. The critical people of this topic believe that the guns do not kill people, it is the people that kill people. The supporters of this topic believe that guns lead to violence and a feeling of power over others. They also believe that if guns were eliminated from the public, then violence and death would decrease heavily in this country. These two opposing views leave the federal government open to a decision on whether or not to abolish one of our Constitutional rights, or to keep allowing people the right to own a gun.
Why are the bans and restrictions being put on guns? Why are some necessary and others are pointless? Every year there are more and more restrictions and bans being put on guns. Some of the restrictions and bans are for good reason. Most bans and restrictions however are pointless and unnecessary. Why do we have all the bans and restrictions? There are a number of reasons for the gun control laws that the United States has.
“It said that gun violence costs the U.S. $229 billion a year.”(“Issue Overview: Guns in America” Paragraph 8, line 6,) The articles are both comparable to each other and differ from each other. These two articles show facts about gun control in similar but also, in contrasting ways. In conclusion, there is numerous ways these articles are related to each other and their stances on gun control.
The National Rifle Association (NRA), recognized today as a major political force and as America's foremost defender of the Second Amendment, “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a Free State the Right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” The NRA adheres to the belief that the Second Amendment guarantees the right of individuals to bear arms. Recent U.S. Supreme Court cases have confirmed those beliefs. In spite of whether one personally adheres to these interpretations of the amendment or not, the fact is there are over two hundred million guns in this country. Moreover, there are over seventy-five million firearm owners. In addition to the NRA’s political activity for second amendment rights, it has fulfilled a service, as since its inception, it had been the premier firearms education organization in the world by providing firearms safety and training.