Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
financial statement fraud
financial statements fraud cases
case study on financial statement fraud
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: financial statement fraud
Le-Nature was a Latrobe Pennsylvania based beverage maker owned by Gregory Podlucky, who is now serving a 20 year prison sentence in New Jersey’s Ft. Dix Federal Corrections Institute. Gregory Podlucky was the admitted ring leader, but in all 5 people plead guilty and another 3 took their chances at trial, where they were all found guilty as well. Le-Nature went into bankruptcy in 2006, and 3 years later they were indicted by the federal government being accused of scamming investors and banks out of more than 800 million dollars. The accounting fraud was an elaborate Ponzi scheme and financial statement fraud. Company officials created false documents, invoices, customer checks, and statements to record activity that never occurred. …show more content…
Taking a look at Donald Cressey’s hypotheses which is now known as the fraud triangle depicts the certain criteria for the mind frame of the fraudster. The fraud triangle is a theory that consists of perceived pressures, perceived opportunity, and rationalization. It gives us the different pressures placed on individuals that would make them consider “cooking the books.” It also demonstrates where the possible opportunity lies so that we may take precautions to eliminate the opportunity. Last, it demonstrates how a fraudster rationalizes with themselves to make committing the fraud okay. Donald Cressey believes all three elements must be present for fraud to occur. Upper management is usually the focus of financial statement fraud because financial statements are done at the management level. So in this case financial statement fraud was committed by the CEO Gregory Podlucky …show more content…
But the stakeholders play a very important role in preventing and deterring fraud. Stakeholders includes customers, suppliers, employees, the community and the government. Each play an important role since they have an interest in the integrity of financial reports of the publicly-traded company. Employees have a vested interest in the company’s success and they have a responsibility to protect their interest. Their roles may start from the bottom but they are key players in the company. To help deter or prevent financial statement fraud, the employee must report financial reporting fraud if it is detected. This can be done by way of a vigorous whistleblower program of some other tip line provided by the company. The community and its members, including the news media, can play a regulator role by confirming that the company is a good citizen with fair business practices. Shareholders should make sure that any company in which they’d like to invest is in compliance with standards of oversight and ethics. Investors need to play and active role also. They should be actively involved by monitoring the companies in which they invest. They should attend shareholder’s meeting regularly to discuss concerns and check the books of the company. This will allow them to stay current with what is going on within the company. Shareholders should always remain vigilant and make
So just how did Scott Welch fit the profile of the average perpetrator? Based off the information reported by the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners’ (ACFE) 2010 Report to the Nation, Welch fit directly into the median for a perpetrator – he was male, between the ages of 46 – 50, had a tenure of at least 6 – 10 years, an executive position as a Vice President. According to the ACFE’s report a perpetrator’s position within the company, age, tenure, gender and education level all have a have consideration in a fraud. In the 2010 report, it is noted that 66.7% of all frauds are perpetrated by men, more than likely due to the fact that more men hold a position of authority. Of the cases studied, 74% of all managers and 88% of all owners/executives were men (Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE), 2010). The combination of Welch’s tenure and authoritative position may have exacerbated the losses suffered by Wachovia and may also have helped him hide the fraud from detection for an extended period of time of eight years (“Former Wachovia,” 2011). This period is well above and beyond the 24 months reported by the ACFE as the median time frame in which frauds perpetrated by executives/owners were detected (ACFE, 2010). Taking into consideration all the kn...
When it comes to the audit objectives, the public and the auditing profession maintain varying expectations. The public expects the prevention of fraud to be the auditor’s responsibility. However, the auditors believe that they are responsible for fraud detection, but not obliged to find all of it. In addition, the public views the fraud by the characteristics displayed by management and employees. For example, WoolEx Mills’ management wanted to exude a prevailing financial position and to uphold reputations. By committing financial statement fraud, it made the company look successful even though Sales and cash flows were decreasing. The public would view these particular characteristics as pressures to why the company committed fraud. Greed, recognition, and influences also impacted the public’s view of Wool Ex Mills’ fraud scheme. The CEO used authority to influence employees to take part in the fraud scheme. The public would see that the CEO utilized power to manipulate shareholders, which impacted their trust with WoolEx Mills (Cohen, Ding, Lesage, & Stolowy 2015) (Krishnan & Shah
Fraud can be perpetrated by anyone within an organization. Where the blame lies is dependent upon who commits the fraud, and the length of time it goes undetected. IN the case of Phar-Mor, the fraud the inevitably resulted in the destruction of the company was perpetrated by Mickey Monus, the COO, but is he solely to blame? Not in this case. Yes, he utilized his authority to perpetrate the fraud, however his CFO, not only agreed to comply with Mr. Monus’ instructions, he was later assigned the job of continuing to falsify the financial statements. Furthermore, Mr. Anderson, the accounting manager also became embroiled in the fraudulent activities.
Received an A- on this paper, United States History, DePaul University, put almost twenty hours into, most I write in four-five hours, very proud of this piece.
For instance, Wesfarmers’ board has set up a separate whistleblower policy to promote reporting of suspected unethical, illegal either with management or Protected Disclosure Officer. Thus, the role of the Target board not only dissemination of parent’s policy to all employees, but importantly to prompt report with adequate and precise information to Wesfarmers. Target board should keep in mind of acting in the best interest of stakeholders of all group instead of its own entity. Notwithstanding those roles, Wesfarmers was aware of Target’s accounting treatment 2015 on March 2016. The accounting arrangements was the case indicated the lack of information reporting or the weakness of information system from Target board to the parent company. When the question about the certainly attention of Target board to the accounting scandal was still open, it could not be concluded that there was a breakdown in its obligation in providing adequate information to the parent company. The responsibility of Target board was not fulfilled with the due care and objective their delegated
All financial crimes have common elements that are seen throughout them. Employee fraud is just as common as other corporate crimes that take place on a higher corporate level. For this particular assignment, employee fraud of Patton State Hospital employees. The employees had committed an accounting fraud against their employer. According to Verver (2013) employee fraud is not the number one concern for CFOs, CROs, and CAEs but it is considered to have a significant drain on the bottom line along with other negative impacts on an organization. Due to this, organizations need to be diligent in ensuring that employees are not given the opportunity to commit any kind of fraud against the corporation.
What do you know about a fraud? And how you can define it broadly? According to Merriam-Webster “a fraud is the crime of using dishonest methods to take something valuable from another person”. It is very useful definition but it is too general. A fraud has many activities to steal money and important documents. It is happening in current days because a fraud mostly relate with technology such as: online shopping and E- banking. It is kind of cheating from people and it’s hard to know being a fraud. This issue had causes many problems for individuals and the society. That affected them in their financial situations. Who were rich because of a fraud, they became poor. They lost their jobs and became homeless. They cannot afford for bills payments. It also affected psychological problems. These problems like suicide, addiction, and alcoholism. The people who have theses problem, they wanted to do any thing to forget being in fraud issue and they became poor and broke. They did protect themselves because the lack of information about a fraud. A fraud has process to work, has many types and, there is some tricks to avoid it; therefore fraud needs to be further clarified.
Through Albrecht, Holland, Malagueño, Dolan, and Tzafrir’s (2015) study, there are five reasons for manipulating a financial statement. These five reasons include a desire for a reward or benefit, fear of punishment, personal knowledge, obedience to authority, and personal relationship needs. Albrecht et al.’s (2015) five reasons, based upon the Classical Fraud Theory, involves three elements: opportunity, threat, and rationalization. Due to one of these elements, people may make unethical decisions. Though through habitual rituals, people may overlook the wrongfulness and
For example, Newbaker has some gambling debts that he needs to repay. This perceived financial pressure now becomes his motivation to commit fraud. Since he also fulfills dual roles in the company, he can use his knowledge and expertise enable to commit and conceal the fraud. He can create fictitious vendor invoices that mirror legitimate invoices previously paid. He could then use his approval authority to verify the invoices’ accuracies as well as issue and sign the checks. He may rationalize his fraudulent activity by either thinking that he's not going to get caught or they can I'll be able to replace the funds later (Arens, Elder, & Borsum 2013) (Accounts Payable and Disbursements Fraud 2016) (The Fraud Triangle
It is important for a company to control fraud risks in any departments whether it is internal fraud or stock fraud. It’s important to put controls in place to protect company reputation and assets.
Throughout the past several years major corporate scandals have rocked the economy and hurt investor confidence. The largest bankruptcies in history have resulted from greedy executives that “cook the books” to gain the numbers they want. These scandals typically involve complex methods for misusing or misdirecting funds, overstating revenues, understating expenses, overstating the value of assets or underreporting of liabilities, sometimes with the cooperation of officials in other corporations (Medura 1-3). In response to the increasing number of scandals the US government amended the Sarbanes Oxley act of 2002 to mitigate these problems. Sarbanes Oxley has extensive regulations that hold the CEO and top executives responsible for the numbers they report but problems still occur. To ensure proper accounting standards have been used Sarbanes Oxley also requires that public companies be audited by accounting firms (Livingstone). The problem is that the accounting firms are also public companies that also have to look after their bottom line while still remaining objective with the corporations they audit. When an accounting firm is hired the company that hired them has the power in the relationship. When the company has the power they can bully the firm into doing what they tell them to do. The accounting firm then loses its objectivity and independence making their job ineffective and not accomplishing their goal of honest accounting (Gerard). Their have been 379 convictions of fraud to date, and 3 to 6 new cases opening per month. The problem has clearly not been solved (Ulinski).
Agency theory, stakeholder theory, stewardship theory and transaction cost economics are the main theories that influence the development of corporate governance. The corporate governance can be drawn from a variety of disciplines and areas such as finance, economics, management, accounting rules, legal and regulatory, organization behaviours, etc. It express concerns in both internal aspects of the company (monitoring internal control & board structure) and the external aspects (eg. relationship of labour policies, role of multi shareholders and other stakeholders) besides protections of minority shareholder’s right (Claessens and Yurtoglu; 2012; Mallin, 2013). The Management will have the responsibility for the design, implementation and maintenance of the internal controls to prevent and detect any fraud that might happen.
...porate governance can affect corporate performance. A board filled with an atmosphere of change and readiness to learn from past mistakes and a sound risk management system would enhance financial value of banks. Yet, no single model of good corporate governance fits all companies. There are some principles initiated by the OECD, the Basel committee on banking supervision, the Walker report, and others. These principles cover the following areas: rights of shareholders; equitable treatment of shareholders; the role of stakeholders; disclosure and transparency; and responsibilities of the board. Moreover, the World Bank has proposed guidelines for good corporate governance in the financial sector. All of these should inform how well a company preforms and result are reported to its stakeholders.
The Tyco accounting scandal is an ideal illustration of how individuals who hold key positions in an organization are able to manipulate accounting practices and financial reports for personal gain. The few key individuals involved in the Tyco Scandal (CEO Kozlowski and CFO Swartz), used a number of clever and unique tactics in order to accomplish what they did; including spring loading, manipulating their ‘key-employee loan’ program, and multiple ‘hush money’ payouts.
Fraud and white-collar crime are common forms of crimes that people commit in various aspects and positions in the corporate world. Fraud and white-collar crimes have similar meaning as they refer to the non-violent crimes that people commit with the basic objective of gaining money using illegal means. The cases of white-collar crimes have been increasing exponentially in the 21st century due to the advent of technology because fraudsters apply technological tools in cheating, swindling, embezzling, and defrauding people or organizations. White-collar crime is a complex issue in society because its occurrence is dependent on many factors such as organizational structure, organization culture, and personality traits. Thus, the literature review examines how organizational structure, organizational culture, and personality traits contribute to the occurrence of white-collar crimes.