Guilt And Innocence In Oedipus

1137 Words3 Pages

In the play Sophocles’ Oedipus Tyrannus the tragic downfall of Oedipus the King brings forth the question was this outcome determined by his predestined fate or his own actions, and if he can be held accountable for his crime. The argument of Oedipus guilt or innocence dates back for centuries, yet there still is not a clear explanation to which side is accurate. King Laius of Thebes Oedipus’ biological father learned from the oracle that if he wed with Jocasta, he would perish at the hands of his son. To avoid the tragic fate Jocasta and Laius abandoned their infant son to the elements as an attempt to kill him. Subsequently, Oedipus is found and raised by King Polybius of Corinth as his own. Only to later return to Thebes in a desperate …show more content…

In the Guilt of Oedipus, Vellacott says “The grey hair lies in the dust, near four other bodies. Oedipus has, at the first opportunity, ignored a divine warning. That this man could be his father would be a coincidence, so incredible as to be impossible; but this was the risk he ought not to have taken. He is guilty.” (Vellacott) This quote signifies the irony of the statement he is blameless because the series of events were out of his control i.e. fate. At the cross road ultimately he has a choice fight or flight and he chooses to fight killing Laius and three other. If it was truthfully fate he would not have a choice at all. In addition, in the play the priest was speaking with Oedipus, who at the time is expressing his concern for the kingdom whose people are falling ill and says to Oedipus, you came to Thebes and freed the city from the Sphinx who riddles made the wisest dumb; you freed us from the monster’s bloody feast, alone, you solved the riddle–killed the beast. (Wilson) The journal A Hermeneutic Tragedy brings forth an interesting analysis The Sphinx, asked Oedipus the question, “what goes on four feet in the morning, two feet at noon, and three feet in the evening?”. Could the Sphinx be given him a chance, a chance to identify himself by questioning his own answer. He does not see that here in this challenge …show more content…

To illustrate Oedipus says,
“He said that I would sleep, once in the mood, with my own mother and to breed a brood who, though they bore their father’s royal name, the people would avoid, for utter shame. He said it was my horrid destiny to murder him who had begotten me. On hearing this, I left my home and fled… And all this time, I was a felon unaware of crime. Exacerbating all, I’ve laid this curse upon myself, and making it still worse, I’ve stained the bed my father made.”
At this point in the play, Oedipus is coming to a so-called realization that he may have killed Laius and the prophecy is true. All this time he knew the prophecy, but remains to claim unaware to the crimes he committed. He ignored the prophecy assuming it to be true and he could elude it but consequently his choice of action failed him. Additionally, for a moment in the play Oedipus recalls his encounter at the crossroads and his unknown encounter with Laius, the old man paid the price and more; he hit him with his staff, and struck him down… he did not give them the opportunity to react, he made sure he killed them all and says “my self-defense was simple execution.” His claim of self-defense is not justified, according to the play Laius and his men were not a serious threat in fact the reason this altercation came about was a mere

Open Document