Growth And Fall In Chinua Achebe's Things Fall Apart

1373 Words3 Pages

and reduce him to an almost not human form so that power and control could be concentrated more effectively. This formula did have long term effects as well as short term effects however the long term effect lingers on till probably today as well particularly in America. Naipaul, V.S. coined the term “mimic men” in reference to the orient. If the other indulged in mimicry, was it substantially that shortcomings in their own cultures that was the sole reason that did not appeal to them? While their language was rich and customs colourful, was it that the notion of growth and advancement as epitomized in Achebe, Chinua’s, “Things Fall Apart”, wherein the Igbo people towards the end of the novel disbanded their Igbo culture and embrace Christianity along with the development of schools in order to have a better future for themselves. It is here where the author presents the division of the self with the self. The vast majority of Igbo brethren are full of fear and anxiety with their hopes pinned on development and progression therefore embracing change in a mixture of pessimism and optimism. However they are realistic in their want of goals and progression for their future generations. The notion of the rejection of a practiced Igbo culture for thousands of years is catastrophic to a character like Okonkwo as him being one of the elder tribesmen, views this as a mere betrayal as his fellow tribesmen strive in order to exceed to a materialistic attitude with how the white man is presented in the novella. It is this evolution in societies such as Igbo, where the self wishes to change the other, whereby the other transforms into the self, which then has a multiplier effect which makes the black man as white as the white man and less ... ... middle of paper ... ...desired output. Productivity and efficiency of an employee would gradually decrease meaning the employer and its clients would be at a sole loss. If we put this analogy in the context of the master and slave relationship, the master at the time did not provide enough or/and decent incentives for the other to strive for. Had the self included an employer’s code of work conduct and ethics in today’s scenario, we can perhaps come to an exciting conclusion that at the end of the day it was the self who was at a massive loss and not the other in this specific aspect. With pathetic working and living conditions for slaves in plantation, cotton and sugar fields, coupled with the fact that the whip was the only reward for the slave, it wasn’t surprising by any means that the ‘savagery’ of slaves came out eventually when they turned violent against planation owners!

Open Document