BERNAMA: ACase Study Generally, a group can be defined as more individuals that are connected to each other by social relationship (Forsyth, 2006). Something should be noted that, most of organisations are consist of several people who work together in particular situations and times (Gordon, 2001). There are four criteria in describing a group; i) the members of the group must perceive themselves as a unit; ii) rewards must be provided by the group to its members; iii) if anything happens to one of the members in the group, the other members should feel the affect; and iv) they must sharing a common goal. Consequently, it could create a group dynamic in a group. Group dynamics involve the study and analysis of how people interact and communicate with each other in face-to-face small groups and it can provide a vehicle to analyze group communications with the intent of rendering the group more effective (Davis &Newstrom, 1985). On the other hand, Cartwright and Zender (1968) defined group dynamics as “a field of inquiry dedicated to advancing knowledge about the nature of groups, the laws of their development and their interrelations with individuals, other groups and larger institutions” (p.19). This could be implied that group dynamic might have been using their present skills such as expertise, laws and their social relationship with other people in the group and institutions as a macro level. Apart from that, Greenlee and Karanxha (2010) stated that group dynamic can be denoted as how the group is effectively works and advance the knowledge to any situations. Each of the organization encompasses of variation of people that they are working certain department. Their interrelations with them could lead to the group dynamic. T... ... middle of paper ... ...od leader will enhance their motivation to fight against the Quraish. References Forsyth, D. (2006). Group Dynamics. United States of America: Thomson Learning Gordon, J. R. (2001). Organizational behavior: a diagnostic approach (7th ed.). Englewood Clifts, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Davis, K. & Newstrom, J. W. (1989). Human behavior at work, organizational behavior (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill International Editions. Cartwright, D. & Zander, A. (Eds). (1968). Group dynamics: research and theory (3rd ed.). New York: Harper & Row. Greenlee, B. J., & Karanxha, Z. (2010). A study of group dynamics in educational leadership cohort and non-cohort groups. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 5, 11, 357-379 Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
Group cohesion is defined as a dynamic process “which is reflected in the tendency for a group to stick together and remain united in the pursuit of its instrumental objectives” (Carron et al., 1985). Literature in to the field of group cohesion is vast Levi, (2001) Discusses group cohesion and refers to the interpersonal bonds that mould a group together. Several various theorists feel that the fundamental components of group cohesion is that of a feeling of belonging or social identity (Lott & Lott 1965:- Hogg 1992)
Group formation or formation of cliques is typically seen as the stereotypical jocks, cheerleaders, geeks, or nerds. But what most do not necessarily take into consideration is that members of each group have an existing commonality between them even if most of the members do not know what that common trait is. Being a part of a group can have an impact on an individual. Through group discussion, individuals only strengthen their beliefs due to the fact that they know that they are not alone in those beliefs since they have friends
Robbins , Stephen P. and Judge, Timothy, A. Organizational Behavior. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey. Prentice Hall. Pearson Custom Publishing. 2008 Print
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2007). Organizational Behavior (12th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, United States of America: Pearson Prentise Hall.
Kreitner, R., & Kinicki, A., (2004). Organizational Behavior (6th ed.). New York: McGraw- Hill/Irwin. pp. 406- 441.
Kinicki, A., & Kreitner, R. (2009). Organizational behavior: Key concepts, skills and best practices (customized 4th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
The Importance of Group Work in Today's Organizations. It could be argued that in order to be successful, modern organisations must actively develop strong and cohesive work groups. Why do you need to be a member? Is it true that there is no room for the individual in today’s organisation? The rapid progression and improvement in information and communication technology has led to modern organisations finding new ways to work.
According to Toseland and Rivas (2005), group dynamics are “the forces that result from the interactions of group members” (p. 64). These forces refer to either the negative or positive influences towards meeting members’ socioemotional needs as well as goal attainment within a group (Toseland & Rivas, 2005), like within my class work group experience. Some of dynamics that continue to emerge and develop in my group is the effective interaction patterns and strong group cohesion, which has generated positive outcomes and group achievement thus far.
McShane, S.L. and Von Glinow, M. A. (2009). Organizational Behavior: Emerging knowledge and practice for the real world. McGraw-Hill.
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2011). Organizational behavior (14 ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Principals of Group Dynamics With Thomason Health System establishing an on-boarding team to facilitate the implementation of an electronic medical record system, it is important to take into consideration group dynamics. Groups can be made up of different individuals that are coming together to accomplish a specific goal. " Group dynamics" refers to the attitudinal and behavioral characteristics of a group. Group dynamics concern how groups form, their structure and process, and how they function" (Advameg, n.d.) In developing teams it is a good idea to have a basic sense of the various stages that occur when establishing a team and having awareness throughout the stages helps leadership understand the reasons for team members behaviors that occurred throughout each stage and helps guide these members to moving onto the next stage.
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2011). Organizational behavior (14 ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Toseland, R.W. & Rivas, R.F. (2005). An Introduction to Group Work Practice, 5/e. Chapter 3. Understanding Group Dynamics. Retrieved from http://centreofthepsyclone.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/group-work-practice.pdf
Kolb, D. A., Osland, J. S., Rubin, I. M., & Turner, M. E. (2007). The Organizational Behavior
Group dynamics can be defined as the interactions that influence the behavior and attitudes of individuals when they are in groups. This is very important in the areas of sociology, psychology, and communication studies.