Group Development Theory Case Study

1060 Words3 Pages

Will Schutz’s group development theory is formulated on the basis that team members are motivated to meet inclusion (in or out), control (top or bottom), and affection (near or far) needs in their team (Group Development Theory, 2015). During initial meetings where inclusion takes place, members will be concerned about part of the team (Group Development Theory, 2015). Members will make their decision about the extent of their involvement ranging from being highly engaged to leaving to address their concerns (Group Development Theory, 2015). Members will determine whether leaders are committed to their welfare and whether other members will pay attention to them and regard them as unique individuals in order to reach their decision to stay or leave (Group Development Theory, 2015). …show more content…

At this stage, members are comfortable with inclusion concerns and think of themselves as part of the group (Group Development Theory, 2015). Control issues start to arise immensely in this phase (Group Development Theory, 2015). When members confront their control issues, they face concerns related to their ability to influence others and to assume responsibility (Group Development Theory, 2015). Once the group enters the control phase, interaction becomes more confrontational (Group Development Theory, 2015). The following phase is affection where members become comfortable with control issues but they face intimacy issues (Group Development Theory, 2015). Members then shall decide how close or distant they will be with each other (Group Development Theory, 2015). Group interaction becomes progressively more emotional during the affection phase (Group Development Theory, 2015). Affection behaviours may involve expressing positive feelings or negative expressions like anger or jealousy (Group Development Theory,

Open Document