Greetings Reptile Members,
By now, you have read on the Keenan Trial Blog, Chris Carver’s and Michael Bristow’s Autopsy in a MVC case. http://www.keenantrialblog.com/reptile-autopsy-reptile-superstars-christopher-carver-michael-bristow/ Chris and Michael’s autopsy centers on the Reptile’s emotional imprint stool. The emotional imprint stool consists of the lie, the betrayal, and the hypocrisy. It is argued that one of these exist in every case. These emotions drive Bubba to correct the wrong by bringing truth to the lie, correcting the actions of the betrayer, and unveiling the hypocrisy. Lastly and most importantly, these words cause Bubba to bring judgment. That is part of the reason why Chris and Michael obtained what they did in this case,
In December, 2011, two years after the unpleasant homicide of Wayne Boyce, the evidence collected for this particular crime suggested Prima Facie existing in the allegations made. The case then went to trial in the NSW Supreme Court of Australia. Where A 19 year old teenager referred by the initials of his name AH as he was a juvenile, pleaded guilty towards the manslaughter of Mr Wayne Boyce, 23 years of age.
Anna and Gracie Sharpe were killed in a calculated double murder, committed by John Sharpe on the 23rd and 27th of March, 2004 [AAP, 2005]. After reportedly arguing with his pregnant wife Anna, Sharpe fired two spears into her head, instantly killing her while she was asleep. He then contemplated killing his 19 month old daughter, Gracie, for 30 minutes before shooting her in the head with the same spear gun he had used to murder Anna. Gracie survived this initial attack, however, as she reportedly ‘screamed’ in pain [Healey, 2004]. Thus, in order to silence her distress, Sharpe retrieved the two spears from Anna’s head and then fired them into Gracie’s head as well, before dismembering her body with a chainsaw and dumping it into a landfill [Hadfield, 2014]. He later returned to exhume Anna’s body where he mutilated her corpse, scattering her limbs at the same place where Sharpe had left Gracie. While these murders were explicitly “singular” in brutality it was Sharpe’s attempt to conceal the crime by playing the victim, which requires closer, criminological attention [Hadfield, 2014].
However, it is the opinion of the author that Johnnie Cochran pinpointed the real tragedy, of why a murderer walked free. The issue went beyond racial or socio-economical discord; the issue was that of ethical responsibility. This paper will address the ethical responsibilities of investigators, especially in high profile cases. It will also address the dereliction of duty by investigators involved in the O.J case and recommend how individuals in the field of forensic death investigations can avoid future embarrassment like that observed in the Simpson
Kathleen Weiand shot and killed her husband Todd. At trial, Kathleen’s defense was BWS; because of Todd’s abuse, she had no choice but to kill him, fearing that if she did not, he would eventually kill her. Defense expert Dr. Len...
On November 29, 2004 Nancy Seaman, an award winning elementary school teacher, was put on trial for the murder of her husband Robert “Bob” Seaman. On May 10th of that year, Nancy hit her husband sixteen times with a hatchet and then preceded to stab him twenty-one times with a kitchen knife. She then cleaned herself up and then went to work as usual. After she returned from her job, Nancy bleached, painted, and scrubbed to clean the garage where she had killed her husband. Then, she wrapped up Bob’s body in a tarp and put it in the trunk of her car. The interesting point of the case is not finding out who killed Robert Seaman, but what the circumstances were for committing the crime.
Both doctors on Stinson’s case, Dr. Johnson and Dr. Rawson have testified that “to a reasonable degree of scientific certainty” the bite marks on the victim had to come from Stinson because they were done close to the time of the death and “was the only person who could have inflicted the wounds.”(Innocence project, 5) “No margin for error” was the concluding sentence of Dr. Johnson, while proving that Stinson is guilty. In Dr. Rawson’s, the chairman of the Bite Mark Standards Committee of the ABFO, testimony that the evidence used in the
Guilty or not guilty? This the key question during the murder trial of a young man accused of fatally stabbing his father. The play 12 Angry Men, by Reginald Rose, introduces to the audience twelve members of a jury made up of contrasting men from various backgrounds. One of the most critical elements of the play is how the personalities and experiences of these men influence their initial majority vote of guilty. Three of the most influential members include juror #3, juror #10, and juror #11. Their past experiences and personal bias determine their thoughts and opinions on the case. Therefore, how a person feels inside is reflected in his/her thoughts, opinions, and behavior.
In this essay it will be about turtles. The turtle that is going to be discussed is the red-Cooter turtles. When we went to Venetians Garden I wanted to do turtles and kept looking for them. Overall I was worried what I was going to do but decided on turtles. Where we went there was some trash in the water depending whether it was under the bridge or the pond. It will have the results, methods, introduction about the project that I doing.
Although Christian Longo is not the first condemned prisoner to request organ donation after his execution, his case is one of the more publicized. He was able to write an editorial
What turtles in the wild eat depends greatly on the type of turtle and its natural habitat. Wild turtles typically eat a lot of plants that grow in the water, small insects, snails, worms, and even dead marine animals and fish. Protein is very important for wild turtle's to grow. This is why many wild turtles are carnivorous when they are young and then gradually start eating plants and vegetation as they age.
"State Makes Public Videotape in Right-to-Die Case", The New York Times National, 2/5/91, P. A16
... killing case in 1988. The DNA result was shocking because the question raised on whether has police overlooked the evidence from the crime scene.
The American Alligator comes from the phylum Chordata and class Reptilia. It is one of the largest reptiles in North America. They have short powerful legs and a long pointed snout. Alligators go over 2,000-3,000 teeth through their lifetime, since 80 teeth have to be in the alligator’s mouth at a time. They grow a foot a year females grow as big as nine feet, while males can be as big as 13-14 feet. They are mostly found in freshwater habitats like rivers, lakes and marshes. It is found in the southeastern of the United States. They are carnivores, they eat snakes, turtles, fish, small mammals. Its hunting is mainly done in the water. According to nature works the alligators swallow small prey as a whole and they drag larger prey underwater
She says that her division was a strictly criminal trial division and that they averaged about 85 jury trials in six months. She says the some of the exhibits in the trials are gruesome. In one case the attorney who represented the State of Florida wanted to show autopsy photos. She said that those photos, “were some of the most gruesome photographs,” she had ever seen. They depicted the face of a victim who was shot in the head execution style. The Medical Examiner had taken the skin off. The said the worst part about it was that the victim was found days after the ‘execution’ and the Florida sun had further damaged the body. She said that the jury was spared seeing the picture but the court reporters were not. She says, “That trial was 15 years ago and I still remember it.”
Losing a child, spouse, sibling, or friend to murder is one of the most difficult situations to endure, especially knowing that the murderer is alive and well. The victim’s families attend countless trials and are involved in numerous court proceedings for multiple years, only to learn that the murderer will be fully clothed, fed, have