Finance and Generational Compromise in GreenStar Cooperatives

733 Words2 Pages

From Table 5, it is evident that finance and the lack of capital is common obstacle. As noted by Brandon Kane, “we are most vulnerable in our finances.”
While both the board member (also the General Manager) and President agreed to similar priorities, they also recognize that “cooperative means compromise” (12th Moon). GreenStar has a history of some members being very involved, especially older founding members. At times, this causes conflict between the wishes or directions of newer and younger members, which can very easily be represented in the Board of Directors. As noted by Brandon Kane, “if there is an issues that is highly debated, we will hold impromptu meetings and allow people to voice their opinion.” Furthermore, GreenStar has …show more content…

However, the directions and paths to reach this ultimatum vary in language, action, and execution. These differences seem to be attributed from experience and perspective. Many of the Board members are closely aligned with the immediate needs of the membership. As a member themselves, they are elected to represent a majority of member-owners. Most member-owners are not intricately involved in the discussions about the co-op, but are very passionate about the core values and tradition of the cooperative like retaining their 2% at the register. As noted by Brandon Kane, “it is symbolical to members...they don’t want to see it go away”. Many members are reluctant to change because they believe it violates the principles the cooperative was founded on. However, when despite not always being aligned in their priorities, GreenStar heavily values giving all members the opportunity to voice their concerns to the board, management, and other members. Even if there appears to be disagreement GreenStar operates by majority decision and most of the time the majority is very

More about Finance and Generational Compromise in GreenStar Cooperatives

Open Document