The Pros And Cons Of Good Bans

1564 Words4 Pages

“Ignorant owners give pit bulls a bad reputation. “

In an editorial entitled, “Ignorant owners give pit bulls a bad reputation”, Becky Bennett argues that pit bull bans are not only questionable as far as lawfulness and usefulness, but would also prompt people whose interests in the breed are for “all the wrong reasons” to “find and misuse, and therefore negatively popularize, another powerful breed” (Bennett). Bennett suggests that instead of breed specific bans, communities would be better off supporting alternatives, such as; supporting local rescues in raising funds to help with educating communities, rehabilitating and finding homes for lost, abandoned, and abused dogs. She also suggests “greater funding and public support for dog law enforcement and cruelty investigation” (Bennett), as well as judges taking minor dog law violations, such as unlicensed dogs and allowing dogs to run free, more seriously. Bennett
Those states are: Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Maine, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Utah, Texas, Virginia, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Florida, Illinois and Nevada. California

prohibits most breed specific laws, but does allow breed specific spay and neuter. According to DogsBite.org, “over 700 U.S. cities have enacted breed specific laws.” However, according to the National Canine Research Council, the numbers of communities that have reduced dog bite incidents after legislating BSL remains at 0. These results, to me, are staggering.

In my experiences with pit bulls they are just as loving as any other breed of dogs if raised properly and in good environments. Of course at the same time they can be aggressive, but is there a breed of dog, or any animal for that matter, that can be abused, mistreated, and raised with malicious intent that would not be? I myself have been attacked by a

Open Document