The Role Of Greed In The Grapes Of Wrath

855 Words2 Pages

People wonder how a human would change when his/her surroundings change. Will they change for the better or worse? Will they still be willing to go out of their way to help those how are around them? John Steinbeck shows us in The Grapes of Wrath how a person can change when they have nothing. He shows us how when people are desperate, they would do anything to further themselves and only themselves. Most of all, he shows us how greed overpowers anything and everything when times are desperate. This motif assists in developing a major theme in the book. It shows that people would be greedy to other human beings, that people would damage nature in order to advance themselves and that people wouldn't help their own family to help further themselves. …show more content…

Prior to the beginning of The Grapes of Wrath, people were living in a prosperous time, living care-free. To take advantage of all of the grain that was grown at the time, they would plow it all down until “the dust was evenly mixed with the air” (5). Their intentions of selling and selling all of this wheat was the reason that everything was plowed down and eventually leaving the people of Oklahoma with virtually nothing but each other. Their greed was the sole reason why the dust bowl has even occurred in the first place. In addition to the dust bowl, another occasion when nature was being harmed by human beings is when the inhumane driver “saw the turtle and swerved to hit it” (21). This driver was willing to crush anything in his way to get to his destination. The turtle could be perceived as a feeder of the land and the driver was willing to kill it in order to conserve more for himself. During the time of the Great Depression, people were not only willing to offer up other people and nature to progress themselves, but they were also willing to sacrifice their own …show more content…

Clearly, it is shown that even family, if need be, would sacrifice each other even though that is their only shoulder to lean on. Uncle John is a great example of this when he “want[ed] a whole pig” (38) and refused to give Pa some food to eat. Uncle John spared some food for the children, but when the time came to share food with his brother, he decided to be a 'hog'. Uncle John would devour the pig until he vomited, so he certainly didn't need to consume the entire thing but he wanted

Open Document