When movies are made from novels, they most likely aren't as well performed and written as the original books, although there are some exceptions such as Forest Gump. As evidence, I believe Baz Luhrmann's production of The Great Gatsby, written by F. Scott Fitzgerald in the 1920's was not performed at its best. Baz Luhrmann did well with the special effects; however, he didn't do well in portraying the characters, the symbols and the setting.
The special effects Baz Luhrmann decided on using, were spectacular he chose some of the most perfect music and three dimensional visuals. Luhrmann did a wonderful job when choosing the music for the movie's scenes and the soundtrack. He chose one particular song that went with the themes, scenes, and plot of the movie. This song was “Young and Beautiful” by Lana del Rey and was played throughout the movie while the tune and beat changed according to the scene. He also chose “A Little Party Never Killed Nobody,” “100$ Bill,” and “Into The Past”. I believe choosing these songs served well for Luhrmann because it attracted the younger, more modern audiences to the movie when hearing a song they know of or like. Luhrmann's three dimensional scenes were also spectacular. For example, the scene when Myrtle Wilson was struck by Daisy, driving Gatsby's car, they made the glass shatter outwards and showed her corpse flying towards the screen. This scene was very graphic which intrigued the audience. Luhrmann had perfect ideas as to what to use when it came to special effects, making the movie very comparable and in some perspectives better than the novel.
The portrayal of the characters in Luhrmann's edition of the movie weren't as well portrayed as special effects. I believe Luhrmann didn't take...
... middle of paper ...
...er and more colorful with the shimmering touch of silver and gold accents.
Ultimately, some may say Luhrmann did an amazing at making the film just as wonderful as the novel however, in my opinion he didn't fulfill my expectations. As well as not portraying characters, symbols, and setting in coition to the book, a few of the scenes failed to relate. For instance, as written in the novel, “Myrtle Wilson... knelt in the road,” when she had been struck, Luhrmann decided to have her laying down. Luhrmann also decided to change her clothes so you could see the wound on her chest as in the book it said they had to remove her dress. In conclusion, The Great Gatsby filmed in 2013, had no comparison to the novel written by F. Scott Fitzgerald in the 1920's. Luhrmann's 2013 edition failed at making the characters, symbols, and setting portray as well as the special effects.
From the start, the movie is adapted from the novel and therefore it could not cover everything, some actions or acts in the novel are too dense such that it is not of any importance to angle them in the movie. It is very realistic to everyone that the movie cannot cover every single paragraph in the novel even the memorable ones. Some materials are left out in the film, and others were changed.
Some individuals make drastic changes, but with a story as iconic as The Great Gatsby, it is key to remain faithful to the original. Small changes are unavoidable and welcome, as long as they do not change the meaning of the text. When it comes to approaching film adaptation John Harrington elaborates on this idea and argues that,
Although Paramount's 1974 version of The Great Gatsby - the one with Robert Redford and Mia Farrow - is probably the most famous, there have actually been six attempts to flatten Fitzgerald's novel into two dimensions. The first was a silent film released in 1926. The second version, with Alan Ladd as Gatsby, appeared in 1949. Two television adaptations followed, one with Robert Montgomery in 1955 and the other with Robert Ryan in 1958. The controversial 1974 adaptation rings in at number five. The sixth version of Gatsby is slated to run on the A&E cable network early next year - Mira Sorvino will play Daisy and Toby Stephens will star as Gatsby. Six! All lacking. All critical failures. [1] So why do they do it? What is it about the novel that tempts Hollywood producers, directors, and the occasional ingenue?
Have you ever thought about when a producer makes a movie out from a well- known novel, how many scene will actually stick to the original story? It has been a trend that the movie industries tend to dismiss many details from the original book in order to gain more rating or revenue from the movie. On the other hand, many viewer will argue or dislike the fact that the movie industries disrespect the author of the book. Recently I got the chance to read The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald and watch the 2013 version’s movie. While the book and the film are pretty similar; there is one major different between the book itself and the movie.
Two movies, one made in 1974 and one in 2013 are the most famous adaptations of the book The Great Gatsby. They are both similar, featuring memorable scenes like Myrtle’s and Gatsby’s parties. They are also different. The making of the 2013 movie is different because the technology now is extremely different from the technology in 1974. Special effects can drastically change the way a movie is made. The two movies, The Great Gatsby, are different in the format, the appearance of the characters, and the presentation of the book’s themes.
At this point, the readers create their own movie in a way. They will determine important aspects of how the character speaks, looks like, and reacts. Whereas, in the movie, the reader has no choice but to follow the plot laid out in front of them. No longer can they picture the characters in their own way or come up with their different portrayals. The fate of the story, while still unpredictable, was highly influenced by the way the characters looked, spoke, and presented themselves on screen.
The film that was produced after the novel has a lot of differences and not as
Thus, Luhrmann wrote the film adaptation of The Great Gatsby in 2013. Fitzgerald wrote 1925. That is almost a century in difference, with an entirely new generation. By changing the details characters and the setting, Luhrmann has allowed a great masterpiece to reach a young and new audience. Regardless of the differences, the tale of The Great Gatsby still excites audiences the same as it did in 1925.
F. Scott Fitzgerald’s novel, The Great Gatsby, and Baz Luhrmann’s movie adaption can hardly be compared but the film somewhat stay true to the text. Luhrmann’s movie was fun to watch but it should have had more originality to it from the
In conclusion, details involving the characters and symbolic meanings to objects are the factors that make the novel better than the movie. Leaving out aspects of the novel limits the viewer’s appreciation for the story. One may favor the film over the novel or vice versa, but that person will not overlook the intense work that went into the making of both. The film and novel have their similarities and differences, but both effectively communicate their meaning to the public.
In conclusion, Baz Luhrmann's version of the film adaptation to The Great Gatsby was in fact very successful and faithful to the novel. The casting was indeed almost perfect because most of the actors such as Toby Maguire (Nick Carraway), Jay Gatsby (Leonardo DiCaprio), Carey Mulligan (Daisy Buchanan), Joel Edgerton (Tom Buchanan) and Jason Clarke (George Willson) all portrait their character wonderfully as described in the novel. The sceneries were great because it was very descriptive compared to the scenes in the novel. The use of Computer Generated Imagery technology was perfect because it highlighted the sceneries making it very vivid, realistic and pleasurable to the eye. The costuming used in the film was very creative, wonderful and perfect because it suited each of the characters class, personality, and it also suited the time period of the 1920s.
“The great Gatsby” is an inspiring novel written by the famous American author Scott Fitzgerald. The novel was published in 1925. It is regarded as Scott’s supreme achievement and also as a masterwork in American literature, and it’s entirely justified.
In conclusion the Great Gatsby 2013 film adaptation is a piece of work that will be remembered for its stunning visuals not a gripping storyline. However this forgettable story is somewhat salvaged by the characterization of Jay Gatsby who shines through as someone to watch the movie just to see. The movie is quite split when it comes to the historical accuracy. Topics like Fashion and modes of transportation are not accurately represented while topics like race relations and the setting of New York City in the roaring 20s are excellently and accurately portrayed. In my opinion this movie with its masterful visual direction and the deep character Gatsby is a movie worth seeing. Who knows you could have a totally different opinion.
Movies can enhance the experience of a story, but they aren’t always completely accurate to the book. The movie, The Great Gatsby, by Baz Luhrmann, is a good representation of F. Scott Fitzgerald’s novel; however, there are quite a few differences between the two. Some differences include; the portrayal of the characters, the importance of symbolism, and events that were either added or taken out of the movie.
For example, Leonardo Dicaprio’s character of Gatsby was focused on emotions. I enjoyed that Redford was very calm and cool about everything and the way he approached the character but, Dicaprio made such an open and outgoing character which made the movie more entertaining. DiCaprio captured Gatsby’s intensity and charm and brought out the crazy mood swings and took his character and the audience to a more emotional place. Both Robert Redford and Leonardo DiCaprio had their own way of approaching the character and really selling Gatsby but Leonardo DiCaprios was better. Another reason I prefer the 2013 version of the 74’ is because of the bond and friendship Nick Carraway played by Tobey Maguire and Gatsby had MaGuire was able to bring a true and strong meaning to their friendship that made his and Gatsby’s bond feel organic and real and you were able to see that clearly unlike with Waterston where you just saw the friendship and didn’t feel any emotion. But I felt much more of a connection with his character than I did with the ’74 version. If you have read the book and seen the original film, then you understood where Nick was coming from in the scene where he was furious with Gatsby, after he believe he killed Myrtle only to find out that Gatsby wasn’t the one driving the car that killed Mrytle, MaGuire, did a fantastic job in showing his emotions and how what happened to Myrtle and the person that killed Myrtle affected him. I loved that Nick was a lot more real in this movie. He didn’t hold back and he gave the audience a reaction that anyone in life would have had if they were in his situation. Nick had the major issue of being dragged into situations because of people he knows. I thought Maguire did a great job of showing ...