Gottfried Leibniz Relation Between The Mind And Body?

1400 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: the relationship between body and mind

What is the relationship between the mind and body? The problem of the mind-body relationship is still ongoing and the quest to find answers can be traced back deep into history. This relationship was one of main issues discussed in the 17th Century Metaphysics. Several opinions exist and each philosopher had his/her own analysis with the supporting evidences. The main question that the philosophers were trying to answer is how do the states of the mind affect that of the body and vice versa? Some philosophers believed that both the mind and body are fully correlated where other philosopher said that no correlation exists at all. Two extremely different views as we can see. Gottfried Leibniz, one of the greatest philosophers in the seventeenth and eighteenth century, had his own explanation which we will discuss next.
So, the question is: is there any causal correlation between the mind and the body according to Leibniz? For him, this is impossible. The mind cannot act upon the body and the body cannot act upon the mind. For Leibniz, a substance cannot affect another substance. So the mind as a substance cannot affect the body as a substance. These are two different finite substances. But how does Leibniz explain the pain I feel when I cut my finger or anything in my body? The cut of my finger led my brain to signal pain so I felt it. If there is no causal correlation, then how did this occur? Leibniz answers this question by saying that although there is no causal relation between mind and the body, they act in a perfectly coordinated way; they act as if there is causal relation between both. In other words, there is a previously established harmony between both. So one asks now, what or who caused this harmony?
God would be the...

... middle of paper ...

...t have a more distinct perception with memory. For example, the human minds and souls have feelings, memory and are self-conscious.
But when we are in a deep and dreamless dream, isn’t the soul similar to a simple monad? Leibniz gives a direct answer in principle 20 where he says it is true that in a dreamless dream the soul is quite similar to simple monads, but this state doesn’t last and the soul arises from it shortly. For Leibniz, this is also a proof for the difference between souls and simple monads.
Each monad is a world in itself. Monads are the only genuine beings that exist. They were formed by the infinite monad, God. Monads are simple but contain qualities. Monads are endowed with perception. Through his theory of monads and the theory of pre-established harmony, Leibniz believes that everything consists of monads in a world of pre-established harmony.

Show More
Related

  • The Mind as a Function of the Body by Richard Taylor

    1003 Words  | 3 Pages

    Richard Taylor explained why the body and the mind are one, and why they are not two separate substances. In the article “The Mind as a Function of the Body”, Taylor divides his article in a number of sections and explains clearly why dualism, or the theory that the mind and the body are separate is not conceivable. In one of these sections it is explained in detail the origin of why some philosophers and people believe in dualist metaphysics. As stated by Taylor “when we form an idea of a body or a physical object, what is most likely to come to mind is not some person or animal but something much simpler, such as a stone or a marble”(133). The human has the tendency to believe a physical object as simple, and not containing anything complex. A problem with believing this is that unlike a stone or a marble a human (or an animal) has a brain and the body is composed of living cells (excluding dead skin cells, hair, and nails which are dead cells). The f...

    Read More

  • Exploring Descartes: The Philosophy of Self-Existence

    1423 Words  | 3 Pages

    In defining mind and matter, Descartes is simultaneously equating the mind with the soul whilst proving it to be distinct from the body and matter. Many philosophers of mind have attempted to address the mind-body problem, proving the relationship between the above two elements. Famously addressed by Descartes, he explored the relationship between consciousness and the brain as he provided several arguments in defence to his stance to the explanation of the union between the mind (or soul) and the body. One of which is the argument from indivisibility:

    Read More

  • Rene Descartes, Nagel And Plato's Approach To Understanding The Difference Between Soul And Soul

    931 Words  | 2 Pages

    The differences of mind and soul have intrigued mankind since the dawn of time, Rene Descartes, Thomas Nagel, and Plato have addressed the differences between mind and matter. Does the soul remain despite the demise of its material extension? Is the soul immaterial? Are bodies, but a mere extension of forms in the physical world? Descartes, Nagel, and Plato agree that the immaterial soul and the physical body are distinct entities.

    Read More

  • Examples Of Substance Dualism

    1311 Words  | 3 Pages

    In my experience, I am aware of many cases in which my body affects my mind (I stub my toe & I feel pain) and many cases in which my mind affects my body (I feel an itch & I scratch it).

    Read More

  • Conception of the Interaction Between Substance in Leibniz’s Monadology and Discourse on Metaphysics

    2282 Words  | 5 Pages

    A significant aspect in Leibniz’s Monadology and Discourse on Metaphysics, is his conception of simple substance and interaction. Leibniz assigns the term Monad to all simple substances. Monads are beings without parts, for which “neither extension, nor shape, nor divisibility is possible” (M3). Monads can exist as determined, necessary, finite, or infinite beings. For Leibniz, God exists as the only one necessary and infinite Monad, who is the sole causer of the infinity many determined, independent and finite Monads in the universe, all of which are contingent on God for their existence (D14). Leibniz claimed that all created Monads “have within them a certain perfection; there is a kind of self sufficiency which makes them the source of their own internal actions” (M18). Some simple substances, however, are also endowed with the qualities of perception that is distinct and accompanied by memory; these types of Monads are called Souls, and example of which is the human mind (D12; M19). These finite Monads are considered independent, even though they are dependent on God, because each exists as a separate contained universe, which cannot interact with other finite Monads or the external world. Interaction, which is defined as a transposition of parts, or matter being exchanged and arranged, cannot occur between the consciousness of the Monad and the physical external world, because minds do not have parts with which to interact with the extended and divisible parts of body.

    Read More

  • Descartes´ Mental and Physical Substances

    1292 Words  | 3 Pages

    The question then is how do the mental substances affect the physical, and vice versa? Because obviously when I stub my toe, though I am only feeling a physical pain, I still feel it as a mental event and, if you will, it affects my “soul”. If these two substances occupy different realms, how can they possibly interact? This is called the mind-body problem, and has been discussed ever since Descartes published his ideas in the sixteenth century. There are two sides to the problem; one dealing with how something mental can cause something physical, and the other addressing how something physical can cause something mental. The real question we must grapple with is how can brain processes cause mental phenomena to begin with? Or how can brains produce the mind, if they even do?

    Read More

  • Property Dualism: The Main Issue Of The Mind-Body Problem

    1110 Words  | 3 Pages

    The mind-body problem can be a difficult issue to discuss due to the many opinions and issues that linger. The main issue behind the mind-body problem is the question regarding if us humans are only made up of matter, or a combination of both matter and mind. If we consist of both, how can we justify the interaction between the two? A significant philosophical issue that has been depicted by many, there are many prominent stances on the mind-body problem. I believe property dualism is a strong philosophical position on the mind-body issue, which can be defended through the knowledge argument against physicalism, also refuted through the problems of interaction.

    Read More

  • The Mind-Body Connection

    1749 Words  | 4 Pages

    This paper will discuss the mind-body connection and it's relevance to health care professionals and to the public. It will explore the history of the mind-body connection, as well as state research that has been done on the subject. The reader will gain an understanding of the various techniques used in mind-body therapy, as well as their effectiveness.

    Read More

  • Physicalism Essay

    796 Words  | 2 Pages

    In philosophy, the majority of studies relate to the mind. Whether it is the main subject or just a helpful side topic to move the main subject along, this term is used often. Defining the term mind is difficult, and is a topic that is popularly studied and debated among philosophers. These qualified and knowledgeable people try to determine whether or not the mind is who people are or if they are their body or a combination. Although they have learned many helpful truths and defined other useful terms, the debate is still evident in the philosophical community today. Learning about how the mind relates to the body, and whether the mind and the brain are the same thing are other ways to look at the many options of how to discern

    Read More

  • Dualism and Artificial Intelligence

    1249 Words  | 3 Pages

    Mind-body dualism is usually seen as the central issue in philosophy of the mind. The problem with mind-body dualism is that it is unknown whether the mind really is a separate entity from the human body as Descartes states in his argument, or whether the mind is the brain itself. Descartes believed that in a person existed two major components, the physical body and the nonphysical body which was called the mind or soul. As a scientist, Descartes believed in mechanical theories of matter, however, he was also very religious and did not believe people could merely be mechanical creatures that ran like “clockwork.” And so, it was Descartes who argued that the mind directed thoughts. To account for this, he split the world into two parts, the scientific world and the mental world. The scientific world was all that was physical, like the human body. The mental world was the mind which could not be seen or touched. Thus, mind-body dualism was created. If the mind could not be seen or touched, how could it possibly interact with the human body and so, how do we know if it even exists? Also, how would we know if other minds exist if we cannot make contact with other minds? Questions like these are what made Descartes’ version of dualism improbable and led to different theories of the mind such as physicalism, which is the belief that the mind is just a result of brain states such as nerve impulses in certain areas of the brain.

    Read More

  • Rene Descartes: The Concept of Dualism

    1101 Words  | 3 Pages

    The mind is a part of the body just like the heart but more dynamic and complex in its nature...

    Read More

  • Essay On Brain And The Brain

    1732 Words  | 4 Pages

    Although many philosophers have tried to solve the mind/body problem, it is best to concede that the inquiry of how the mind and the brain get connected is best left up to the individual person and what they want to believe. I believe the philosopher J.J.C. Smart to be correct in his theory in my own personal

    Read More

  • History of Psychology

    1357 Words  | 3 Pages

    While the great philosophical distinction between mind and body in western thought can be traced to the Greeks, it is to the influential work of René Descartes, French mathematician, philosopher, and physiologist, that we owe the first systematic account of the mind/body relationship. As the 19th century progressed, the problem of the relationship of mind to brain became ever more pressing.

    Read More

  • Descartes’, Spinoza’s, and Leibniz’s Response to the Mind-Body Problem

    2994 Words  | 6 Pages

    Since Descartes many philosophers have discussed the problem of interaction between the mind and body. Philosophers have given rise to a variety of different answers to this question all with their own merits and flaws. These answers vary quite a lot. There is the idea of total separation between mind and body, championed by Descartes, which has come to be known as “Cartesian Dualism”. This, of course, gave rise to one of the many major responses to the mind-body problem which is the exact opposite of dualism; monism. Monism is the idea that mind and body one and the same thing and therefore have no need for interaction. Another major response to the problem is that given by Leibniz, more commonly known as pre-ordained harmony or monadology. Pre-ordained harmony simply states that everything that happens, happens because God ordained it to. Given the wide array of responses to the mind-body problem I will only cover those given by Descartes, Spinoza, and Leibniz. I will also strive to show how each of these philosophers discuss what mind and body are and how each accounts for God’s influence on the interaction of mind and body, as this is an interesting distinction between them, as well as the important question of the role of substance. This is important, I believe, because it helps to understand the dialogue between the three philosophers.

    Read More

  • Cartesian Dualism and Gilbert Ryle

    1031 Words  | 3 Pages

    two distinct kinds of entities, bodies and minds (1). All objects that exist or can exist belong to one of these categories. The two forms are said to be mutually exclusive and commonly defined by fundamentally different characteristics, yet both are required to accurately define the world around us. According to Descartes, the body is a tangible physical substance (the unthinking thing), whereas the mind is an intangible non-physical substance (the thinking thing) and comes metaphysically before the body (3). The mind and body casually interact with one another while maintaining their distinctiveness: the eyes perceive objects and then focus the image to the pineal gland, where it transmits the information to the non-physical mind; the mind then may transmit a signal to the body, telling it what to do. The mind and body are independent from one another, yet they work in harmony; the mind receives signals from the body and the body responds to signals from the mind.

    Read More

More about Gottfried Leibniz Relation Between The Mind And Body?

Open Document