Gospel Inecusivity Vs. Inclusivity

1105 Words3 Pages

There is typically one of two reasons the question of Gospel exclusivity versus inclusivity is raised. Negatively, it is posed as an attack on Christianity. Essentially, “Do Christians really believe that all unreached people groups will go to Hell because they were never handed a Bible?” Conversely and positively, the question is asked out of pure curiosity or because of an intention to better understand Christianity. A follow-up question may frequently be, “How can we ensure that all human beings are given the opportunity to hear the Gospel?” In this scenario, I am answering the question as if addressing a brother or sister in Christ. Honestly, the age of the inquirer is of little significance. This is a question with which Christians young and old struggle and I do not feel attempting to “water-down” the response does any service to the hearer.
First, an explanation for the need of the Gospel must be given. Without this explanation, there exists one primary inclusivism argument that would appear to …show more content…

First and foremost, the responsibility of placing the Gospel into the hands of the heathen lies with the Christian population itself. Christians are called to be “ambassadors” as it says in 2 Corinthians 5:20, “Therefore, we are ambassadors for Christ, God making His appeal through us.” Rightly, as ambassadors we must seek out the lost all across the globe, “to the end of the earth” (Acts 1:8). John Piper, in a letter to a young congregation member, advises us to “pray for missionaries” and seek God’s counsel as to whether we are being called to the mission field. There are a limited number of ways heathens are exposed to the Gospel, and the work of missionaries is the primary way. The onus is on us, as Christians, to shed the light of the Gospel on unreached and untouched parts of the

Open Document