The Crucible Theme Essay
Good Vs evil The year is 1693 and the people in Salem village are calm until Reverend Parris( The town's pastor) finds a group of girls dancing in the woods around a fire and chanting songs.Reverend Parris’s daughter then starts to become unconscious and will not wake up. The true theme of this play I believe is Good vs Evil. The reason people may believe this is because there are many instances where God is brought upon in this play and so go towards Satin which represents the theme Good Vs Evil. Human nature can never escape good versus evil, so by Arthur Miller writing about good versus evil in the play The Crucible he is showing that it is a universal theme. This first Quote comes from the beginning of the
…show more content…
Mrs. Putnam: They were murdered, Mr. Parris! And mark this proof! Last night my Ruth were ever so close to their little spirits; I know it, sir. For how else is she struck dumb now except some power of darkness would stop her mouth? It is a marvelous sign, Mr. Parris!
Putnam: Don’t you understand it, sir? There is a murdering witch among us, bound to keep himself in the dark. (I.103-110)”. This quote can prove the them of being Good Vs Evil being that in this part of the play a good thing happened which was that the babies are born and then the constant struggle was that she lost them ever one to unnatural or unknown causes. The second quote is from the middle of the play preferably the third at in which the climax of the story has reached its peak people have started to accuse people to stay out of trouble of the price that in which is to be hung. Here is the quote”Proctor: Mary, tell the Governor what they—(He has hardly got a word out, when, seeing him coming for her, she rushes out of his reach, screaming in horror.)
Mary Warren: Don't touch me—don't touch me! (At which the girls halt at the door.)
Proctor, astonished: Mary!
Mary Warren, pointing at Proctor: You're the Devil's
…show more content…
Proctor, as Danforth's wide eyes pour on him: Mary, Mary!
Mary Warren, screaming at him: No, I love God; I go your way no more. I love God, I bless God. (Sobbing, she rushes to Abigail.) Abby, Abby, I'll never hurt you more! (They all watch, as Abigail, out of her infinite charity, reaches out and draws the sobbing Mary to her, and then looks up to Danforth.)
Danforth, to Proctor: What are you? (Proctor is beyond speech in his anger.) You are combined with anti-Christ, are you not? I have seen your power; you will not deny it! What say you, Mister? (III.496-519)”. As the reader can clearly see at this point in the play right or wrong has been completely erased in this society because everybody just wants to save there own skin therefore signs of evil are present.And therefore proves the reasoning of the theme even more. These quotes can higley prove the theme as there are many other instances in the play where there are signs of both good and evil but in this play the point that Arthur Miller wanted to make to all of the readers is that the bad overtakes the good in this play as in portrayed in all of the quotes stated
This whole play by Arthur Miller shows how our community will turn on each other to save ourselves no matter if it’s right or wrong and it’s true in our society today. It also shows how a good man regained his happiness and holiness by standing up for what’s right against the lies and sacrificed himself for the truth.
During the early years of the colonies, there was a mad witch hunt striking the heart of Salem. Anger, reputation, and even religion play an important part during the play of The Crucible, written by Arthur Miller. The author allows us to witness the vivid idea of the hysteria taking place in Salem, Massachusetts, and why it was so vulnerable during the time.
Danforth tells Proctor “Courage man, courage-let not her witness your good example that she may come to God herself. Now hear it, Goody Nurse! Say on, Mr. Proctor. Did you bind yourself to the Devil’s service?” (Miller 128).
See the ECB's ECB's ECB's ECB's ECB's ECB's ECB's ECB's ECB' This quote from Proctor is riddled with references to God and the judgment God passes on Proctor’s actions. Proctor also repeats the references to God earlier in the play, when he tries to convince Elizabeth he is not guilty of having an affair with Abigail. Proctor says, “I have roared you down when you first told me your suspicions. But I wilted, and like a Christian, I confessed. Confessed!
“Looking at Giles,” he states, “who is this man?” One can evidently sense an outrage here as he cannot believe that someone is challenging his authority. On another occasion in Act 3, Danforth asks, "You deny every scrap and tittle of this?" Abigial responds by “hissing”, "If I must answer that, I will leave and I will not come back again." Momentarily, Miller then states in the stage directions that Danforth "seems unsteady."
In The Crucible, by Arthur Miller, justice and injustice is portrayed through the characters of John Proctor, Elizabeth Proctor and Abigail Williams. It is also shown through the minor characters of Mary Warren and Mercy Lewis, followers of Abigail Williams, and through Danforth and various townspeople.
The play, The Crucible, is a fireball of guilt, evil, and good compiled into one magnification. It is a play with tremendous feelings, with many inside twists hidden in the archives of the true story. It is a play with emotional feelings; feelings of anger, hate, and evil, yet also feelings of goodness, and pureness. Undeniably, The Crucible is a play illustrating good versus evil. The principal characters, Abigail Williams, John Proctor, Ann Putnam and Marry Warren all contain within them elements of good and evil.
Jealousy also played a big role in who was to blame for the deaths in Salem. The Putnams were a small family, whose seven children out of eight did not survive. Mrs. Putnam was a very jealous person when it came to families, and Mr. Putnam was a very jealous person when it came to land. Goody Putnam wanted more children and was jealous of Rebecca Nurse and her large family, so she blamed her for witchcraft.
... integrity are among the most important things. He also uses Proctor to demonstrate what an unjust system can do to an individual with good intents. The play is a parallel to the anti-Communist McCarthy era. Through John Proctor we see the ludicrous nature of mass hysteria that exists when society has gone awry.
At the end of the play, John proctor is faced with the biggest calamity of his life. He was given the the choose to lie and say he is a witch or stand by his honesty and die as a marauder. john proctor name was everything to him. It made him who he is so he based his actions on it.. John wanted to live and keep his good name
A crucible refers to a harsh test, and in The Crucible, by Arthur Miller, each person is challenged in a severe test of his or her character or morals. Many more people fail than pass, but three notable characters stand out. Reverend John Hale, Elizabeth Proctor, and John Proctor all significantly change over the course of the play.
The Crucible is a 1953 play by Arthur Miller. Initially, it was known as The Chronicles of Sarah Good. The Crucible was set in the Puritan town of Salem, Massachusetts. It talks of McCarthyism that happened in the late 1600’s whereby the general public and people like Arthur Miller were tried and persecuted. The Crucible exemplifies persecutions during the Salem Witch Trials. The people were convicted and hung without any tangible proof of committing any crime. Persecutions were the order of the day. When a finger was pointed at any individual as a witch, the Deputy Governor Danforth never looked for evidence against them or evidence that incriminated them; he ordered them to be hanged. This can be seen through his words “Hang them high over the town! Who weeps for those, weeps for corruption!” (1273), the people were persecuted aimlessly. The four main characters in the play, John Proctor, Abigail Adams, Reverend Hale and Reverend Parris, are caught in the middle of the witchcraft panic in the religious Salem, Massachusetts in late 1690’s. Persecution is the most important theme in the Crucible, the leaders and citizens of Salem attacks and persecutes one of their own without any tangible evidence against them.
Danforth’s has too much confidence on his ability to distinguish the truth. His strong puritan beliefs blinds him from reality and considers people who goes against him as suspects. This demonstrated when he says, “But you must understand, sir, that a person is either with this court or he must be counted against it, there be no road between.” (94). This quotation proves that his decisions on court is mostly bias and he is against anything that violates his puritan beliefs. In addition, he also uses his authority as a Deputy Governor to maintain his reputation. He does not want to accept his mistakes and try to correct it because he does not want his reputation to be tainted. He displays this character by saying, “you misunderstand, sir; I cannot pardon these when twelve are already hanged for the same crime. It is not just.” (129). Danforth is too concerned about his reputation and he is afraid to that he will lose it if he admits that he has made wrong judgements. His bias opinion on what is right plays a vital on the mass hysteria that happened in
The Crucible – Human Nature Human nature was fully to blame for the disaster which took place in Salem in 1692. Human nature is what your character is made of in trying situations, and in 1692 scientific knowledge was extremely poor by today's standards and so all reoccurring problems were blamed on an evil force, whether it be the devil or witches or anything the imagination could conjure, hence human nature was being tested regularly. The decisions people made were critical to the disaster's progression, in today's scene in would have been dismissed within minutes, but the paranoia floating around in the town kept the ball rolling. People were so terrified of the thought of evil that any suggestion of it would create a preordained judgement in the mind of anyone, especially those who made judgement of the accused. To get to the supposed
this play demystifies and criticizes the early modern practice of scapegoating women accused of witchcraft; the play shows how the community of Edmonton, abetted by the English legal system, eliminates a marginal member of the community upon whom the idea of contagion is projected. On the other hand, and simultaneously, the play actively participates in the Jacobean fascination with and sensationalism surrounding witchcraft trials: