Good Versus Evil

965 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Jacks character in lord of the flies essay

Good versus Evil The question is are Roger, Jack, Simon evil or good. What are their actions driven by impulse or choice. Also if Roger, Jack, and Simon innocent if they are good or if their evil are the not innocent. In Lord of the Flies, Golding uses the characters’ levels of innocence to identify whose actions are good, and whose actions are evil. Throughout the book Simon is shown as a morally good character that doesn’t show signs of evil. Simon is always looking to help others for example “Simon found for them the fruit they could not reach, pulled off the choicest from up in the foliage, passed them back to the endless, outstretched hands”(Golding 967). When he does this it shows he will help when no one else will. Another reason why Simon is a good person is when he discovers that the beast isn’t real. All he wants to do is to inform the other boys of the news. A final thing that makes Simon good is when he helps Piggy find his glasses when Jack knocked his glasses off. Simon good but does is impulsive in his actions and doesn’t think things through. Simon actions are very impulsive in nature because he does not think things through before he acts. For example when Simon runs into the group of boys during their hunting dance it leads to his murder. He was thinking of what was going to happen. He just wanted to inform the other boys about the beast. He is also impulsive when he volunteered to go tell Piggy that he Ralph, and Jack would not be back home till before dark. He did this without thinking and he knew the other boys wouldn’t go because they didn’t have the courage to go alone back to camp in the dark. A final reason of two why he is impulsive is “Simon, sitting between the twins and Piggy, wiped his mouth and shove... ... middle of paper ... ...er actions are based on choice and he is evil so therefore he is not innocent. Roger is not innocent throughout the whole book Lord of the Flies. He is not innocent one because he is one of the most aggressive boys in the book (source 4). Second he is not innocent he took apart of killing an innocent boy named Simon. Also he took part in an murder of Piggy’s. Being part of those two murders is a huge reason why he is not innocent. A final reason to when Roger is not not innocent is because Roger lost his sanity, and went crazy; he was mean and hurt most of the boys in some way. There was nothing Roger did that was innocent. In conclusion that is why Roger and Jack are both evil. Also Simon is ultimately good throughout the whole book. In Lord of the Flies, Golding uses the characters’ levels of innocence to identify whose actions are good, and whose actions are evil.

Show More
Related

  • Polarization And Savagery In Lord Of The Flies

    90 Words  | 1 Pages

    While Jack and Ralph represent the distinct polarization between civilization and savagery. Simon is separated from both of these dimensions. Simon represents built-in goodness. The other boys who hold on to their sense of morality only do so because society has conditioned and trained them to act in a certain way. They do not have an innate sense of morality. Unlike the other boys on the island, Simon does not act morally because an external force has compelled him to do so, instead he finds value in performing good actions.

    Read More

  • 4. How Do The Boys React To Simon's Fainting Spell?

    619 Words  | 2 Pages

    Simon is a lot different from all of the other boys not just because he can do spells but because he constantly expressed concern of the other boys. All other boys have different reactions to his fainting spell, like Piggy. Piggy falls to the floor and his glasses fall off his face. Piggy doesn't know what happened and can’t get up quite yet. All the other boys understand what kind of spells Simons doing. But they still tend to have effect such as illusions and hallucinations. Simon and the boys relate in some way, half of it because of the spells simon does.

    Read More

  • Dialectical Journal For Lord Of The Flies

    2042 Words  | 5 Pages

    he may lack in the athletic field, but his brain made up tremendously for that loss. In the first couple chapters, Ralph thought a fire would be beneficial in order to get rescued so, Piggy utilized his glasses, directed the lenses towards the sun and fire appeared. Thirdly, Simon represented the good on the island. All the young boys turned to Simon as their leader because Simon did not see age difference, he welcomed all with open arms. He also helped Ralph with the unstable shelters when the rest were distracted with antics, Simon is an overall warm hearted kid.

    Read More

  • Simon's Life on the Island

    750 Words  | 2 Pages

    The lack of civilization and human goodness leads the young children to evils and a bad environment that they have never faced. Simon, a “skinny, vivid boy, (pg. 24)” is a member of Jack’s choir but soon leaves his tribe and joins Ralph because he is not able to deal with the cruel leadership. As all the other characters fail to maintain responsibilities and their commitments to the rules of the island, Simon is the only person who dedicates to them as things begin to fall apart. He is a character with a respectful, spiritual personality and has a human goodness with nature as he deals with the littluns and the older boys. For example, he helps the littluns pick fruit to eat, recovers Piggy’s glasses when they fly off his face, gives Piggy his own share of meat when he was refused a piece and gives ...

    Read More

  • Lord of the Flies by William Golding

    1025 Words  | 3 Pages

    Golding makes very good use of characters in Lord of the Flies, he shows both good and evil through each of the characters. One of the characters that represents goodness is Simon. He is very good and pure, and has the most positive outlook. Simon is very different from the other boys, he seems to always be helping the Littluns and many other vulnerable boys such as Piggy. "Simon sitting between the twins and Piggy, wiped his mouth and shoved his piece of meat over the rocks to Piggy, who grabbed it." (Golding, pg.74) This quote interprets an example of a time when Simon helped Piggy by giving him food, it shows Simon's wholeheartedness. Another example would be when Simon helps the Littluns pick fruit from high to reach places. All in all Golding tries to portray Simon as a Christ like figure.

    Read More

  • Lord of the Flies

    835 Words  | 2 Pages

    Simon is the morally good boy. His selflessness and goodness comes from within. He is kind to the little boys, and helps the outcasts. For example, when none of the boys want to give Piggy meat from the first pig, Simon steps up and takes him meat. "Simon…wiped his mouth and shoved his piece of meat over the rocks to Piggy…"(p.74) While everyone else is cruel to the young ones, he helps the "lil'uns" grab meat from the trees when they can't reach. "Simon found for them the fruit they could not reach, pulled off the choicest…passed them back to the endless, outstretched hands." (p.56) Simon helps those whom no one else is kind to, perhaps remembering that he was looked down upon once. He realizes what it's like to be scorned and to be the "little one", so he tries to make it less miserable for the outcasts by being kind to them. He wants to always help others, so when he discovers the beast is inside of everyone, not external, as they had imagined, he instantly runs down the mountain to tell him. He helps others even to the point of death.

    Read More

  • Lord of the Flies

    1193 Words  | 3 Pages

    Simon is perhaps the most important character in the novel for he is the first and only character to come to the realization that the Beast is inside them all, and is not represented by a physical manifestation. Simon is a follower, not a leader. He believes and trusts what Ralph, his leader, says. That’s why he mentions that the beast could be inside all of them once, and immediately discards that because Ralph doesn’t think so. His confrontation with the Lord of the Flies is the only way he can liberate that information to himself. The encounter begins with “Even if he shut his eyes the sow’s head still remained like an after-image.” This represents the beginning of the fixation Simon is having on the head, thinking of it even after he shuts his eyes. Golding then points out that the pig had half shut eyes and were dim with infinite cynicism of adult life. Those details come back a little later. It’s at this point where Simon asks himself a question and answers it aloud. “ ‘I know that.’ Simon discovered that he had spoken aloud”. “He opened his eyes quickly and there was the head grinning amusedly in the strange daylight, ignoring the flies, the spilled guts, even ignoring the indignity of being spiked on a stick.” That sentence shows the continuing evolution of the fixation Simon has in this encounter. The first thing he sees when he opens his eyes is the head, and he ignores every detail around it. This is when Simon comes to the realization that his original conclusion is credible, the one he let be because of Ralph. He looks away, trying to forget the head even exists, but cannot accomplish that task.. He pulls himself back to the head “Might not the beast come for it?”, simply because he believes the Beast is not a physical manifestation, therefore being impossible for it to come. According to Simon, the head seems to agree with him. At this point, he knows the Beast doesn’t exist physically, but he is hesitant none-the-less. The head says “Run away […] go back to the others. It was a joke really—why should you bother? You were wrong, that’s all. A little headache, something you ate, perhaps. Go back, child.” Simon is making excuses for himself through the pig. Here, the fixation on the head is nearly complete.

    Read More

  • What Is The Evil In Lord Of The Flies

    796 Words  | 2 Pages

    The issue on whether man is good or evil has been debated over several generations. In William Golding’s Lord of the Flies, a group of young boys are stranded on an uninhabited island. In the beginning, the boys have fun and are carefree while adventuring on the island. With no adults around to tell them how to behave, the boys declare war on one another and face several conflicts. These conflicts provide Golding with the opportunity to explore the idea that society restrains the evil intentions of human nature.

    Read More

  • Thesis Essay

    772 Words  | 2 Pages

    Another example of human nature that Golding shows through Lord Of the Flies is through the killing of Simon. The boys are too focused on their chanting around the fire and other primitive behaviors to realize that the “beast” that they see is Simon. Simon, unlike the rest of the boys, is not associated with savage-like behavior and remains very civilized throughout his time on ...

    Read More

  • Inherent Evil in Lord of the Flies

    838 Words  | 2 Pages

    Lord of the Flies provides one with a clear understanding of Golding's view of human nature.  Whether this view is right or wrong is a point to be debated.  This image Golding paints for the reader, that of humans being inherently bad, is a perspective not all people share.   Lord of the Flies is but an abstract tool of Golding's to construct the idea of the inherent evil of human nature in the minds of his readers.  To construct this idea of the inherent evil, Golding employs the symbolism of Simon, Ralph, the hunt and the island.

    Read More

  • The Beast in Lord of the Flies

    688 Words  | 2 Pages

    The point that Golding was trying to make was that evil is inside all of us. He used this novel to express to the readers his thoughts on the matter, which was that to defeat the evil inside yourself, you have to admit that it is there. Simon managed to face the beast inside him. But unfortunately, since the other boys still believed that the beast was a living, breathing creature, it resulted in the death of Simon.

    Read More

  • Control In Lord Of The Flies

    1245 Words  | 3 Pages

    Throughout William Golding's novel Lord of the Flies there is an ever-present conflict between two characters. Ralph's character combines common sense with a strong desire for civilized life. Jack, however, is an antagonist with savage instincts, which he cannot control. Ralph's goals to achieve a team unit with organization are destroyed by Jack's actions and words that are openly displayed to the boys. The two leaders try to convince the boys that their way of survival is correct.

    Read More

  • Lessons Taught By William Golding's "Lord of the Flies"

    883 Words  | 2 Pages

    Man’s inhumanity to man literally means human’s cruelty towards other humans. This is a major theme of the story and is seen throughout it. Golding himself even states that “man produces evil as a bee produces honey.” A review of the book states how Golding portrays this “because the boys are suffering from the terrible disease of being human.” Piggy, Ralph, and Simon are the “rational good of mankind” portrayed in the book, and Jack and his hunters are the “evil savagery of mankind.” “The beast” is a symbol for the evil in all humans, and Simon and Piggy, or rationality, are almost helpless in his presence. Simon, though, in a book filled with evil, is a symbol of vision and salvation. He is the one to see the evil as it truly exists, in the hearts of all humanity. When he tries to tell the others of this truth, however, he is killed, much like Christ was trying to bring salvation to the ignorant. Simon being there gives us hope; the truth is available to those who seek it. In the book, Jack and his hunters become so evil that they end up killing two boys while on the island. Man’s tendencies towards evil in The Lord of the Flies are also compared to the book of Genesis in the Bible. Nature, beauty, and childhood can all be corrupted by the darkness within humankind. The ending of this truly dark and evil story tells readers how Golding feels about evil within society and where he thinks humanity is headed. Evil will triumph over the intellect and good, unless some force intercedes. In th...

    Read More

  • The Character of Simon in William Golding's Lord of the Flies

    425 Words  | 1 Pages

    In the beginning, Simon was described as a 'skinny, vivid little boy…,'; (Golding 24) showing that he was undersized and possibly weaker than the others. He stuck around Ralph for a while, went exploring with him and Jack, and even helped him build the shelters. It was not long before he began to wander off by himself to that little place among the creepers. The other boys thought he was 'queer….funny.'; (55) because he was an outcast and rather strange.

    Read More

  • Good vs. Evil in William Golding´s Lord of the Flies

    725 Words  | 2 Pages

    It seems as though there is so much more evil than good in the world today. We hear of war and fighting 24/7 but we rarely hear about the good things that happen. Everyone is born with both good and bad within them. We, as humans, must choose which one we want to be. In The Lord of the Flies, Ralph is good while Jack is evil. Ralph represents the good side of us while Jack represents the evil side. Although sometimes it is easier to be evil, it pays off to be good. The novel is a perfect example of how all people are born with both sides. At the beginning, the boys choose the good side, with morals and civilization. But as the story moves on, the boys find it more exciting to be on the bad side. It shows that all the boys are torn between good and bad and there is a very thin line that separates both. We realize that people are born inherently good and bad because in life there are always right and wrong choices, children are born good but are easily influenced to do bad, and it is always harder to do what is right than what is wrong.

    Read More

More about Good Versus Evil

Open Document