Good To Great - Management According To Collins

1883 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Discipline and management

Management

According to Collins

In his book, Good to Great, Jim Collins gives a detailed comparison between companies that are able to excel continually in their field and companies that are either mediocre or one hit wonders. Through their research his team was able to find distinct characteristics having to do with leadership, planning or purpose, human and technological resources, and discipline that differentiate the great businesses from the ordinary ones. Some of the main ideas that Collins’ focuses on are the Level 5 leader, the Hedgehog Concept and the Culture of Discipline, which all fit together to transform a simply good business into one that has long lasting cumulative returns much higher than that of the market (8). These ideas are what form Collins’ model of management based on their application to planning, organizing, leadership and control, of which many have connection with the theories of previous authors such as Deming, Anderson, and Stack. Like some of these authors, Collins’ model is based on a transformation, however his transformation is not based on a fast acting catalyst, instead it focuses on finding the right product, understanding it, and then building momentum around it that will eventually take the company to the top. Once a company becomes great, Collins’ describes how certain aspects of the company must remain the same, specifically the discipline towards the planned focus of the company, while others, such as strategy and operating practices must adapt to changes (197).

The method that Jim Collin’s and his team of researches used was based on first finding the right companies and then recording not only what they observed but also documents and articles written on the company both external...

... middle of paper ...

...right things while discontinuing the wrong ones (140).

Throughout his book, Collins shows us that when all of these different functions of management are applied, the success of the business should be set in motion. He also proves that as long as the company continues to do what makes it successful when it will build momentum until it becomes great. Once the business has become great, it should be very simple to keep it that way as long as the disciplined culture continues to focus the business’s energies. However most of this depends on the leaders within the company, and whether or not they are willing to apply the concepts of this book and become level five leaders, that are successful for the company as a whole and not just themselves.

Works Cited

Collins, Jim. Good to Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap and Other Don’t.

New York: HarperCollins, 2001.

Show More
Related

  • Muzz Buzz Business Investigation

    1361 Words  | 3 Pages

    According to Brad the characteristics of management that contribute to success can be broken into six categories. The first one being a...

    Read More

  • Implications of the Lessons in "Adventures of an IT Leader" for General Managers

    3425 Words  | 7 Pages

    This book is important to business students because it shows that even the most seasoned executive runs into unexpected challenges and can find themselves in uncharted territory. Jim Barton’s experiences and lessons can be lessons for anyone. Any employee, whether they are support staff or a top executive, should always maintain an open mind and be ready to learn from a situation or the people around them at any time.

    Read More

  • Good To Great: An Analysis Of Har Collins's Good To Great

    1087 Words  | 3 Pages

    Collin’s objective in Good to Great is to show how companies have gone from good to great. Disciplined thought and creating a culture of discipline are the significant components that gave momentum to the companies who have gone from good to great. Collins conducted a research team of students over a span of five years to do research, interviews, and collecting data that would reveal how disciplined thought and action moved companies forward within a time frame of fifteen years. (The eleven good to great companies the research was drawn upon were Abbott, Circuit City, Fannie Mae, Gillette, Kimberly-Clark, Kroger, Nucor, Philip Morris, Pitney Bowes, Walgreens and Wells Fargo. These were compared with elven other companies that were good but no great)

    Read More

  • Analysis of The Goal by Eliyahu Goldratt

    428 Words  | 1 Pages

    Many people believe that in order to succeed in a business that is having difficulties, it is important to focus on a particular area in order to be better productive in each of them, and be able to reach the goal. Instead, Goldratt and Jonah demonstrates that is important to focus on the company as a whole, but at the same time, it shows that it is incorrectly to only focus in an specific manufacturing department, or one plant, or a department within the plant, because people should not be concerned in local optimums.

    Read More

  • Control And Leadership

    1061 Words  | 3 Pages

    According to the text, “Control is defined as any process that directs the activities of individuals toward achievement of organizational goals. It is how effective managers make sure things are going as planned (Bateman, pp 520, 2007).” The combination of these two concepts, leadership and control help formulate an ideology that becomes an integral part of the success or failure of any business entity. This paper will give Team D an opportunity to delve into Sears Holdings’ leadership and control mechanisms. The focal point of this paper will be to identify the current CEO of Sears Holdings, and gain insight on his background, i.e., training, education, and previous employment. To identify his style of leadership, evaluate the effectiveness of this leadership style based on Sears Holdings’ performance, and to explain the various control mechanisms used in the organization to determine the effectiveness.

    Read More

  • The Life and Legacy of Steve Jobs

    2787 Words  | 6 Pages

    Suddenly, some companies become extremely successful, while rest of them unfortunately remains a failure. There can be off-course a lot of reasons for this failure but one of the main reasons is lack of leadership qualities. There are many s...

    Read More

  • Home Depot Blueprint For Culture Change Case Study

    1514 Words  | 4 Pages

    The third Case Study “Home Depot’s Blueprint for Culture Change” studied Mr. Robert Nardelli’s role as the CEO of Home Depot. He approached management in an autocratic style, which was criticized by many. This paper will take a look at how Mr. Nardelli’s style follows Kotter and Cohen’s model of change.

    Read More

  • Why Change Programs Don 't Produce Change

    749 Words  | 2 Pages

    Faced with changing markets and higher competition, more and more firms are struggling to reestablish their dominance, keep market share, and in some cases, ensure their survival. Many have come to understand that the key to competitive success is to transform the way they function. They are reducing reliance on managerial authority, formal rules and procedures, and narrow divisions of work. In effect, companies are moving from the hierarchical and bureaucratic model of organization that has defined corporations since World War II to what can be called the task-driven organization where what has to be done governs who works with whom and who leads. But while senior managers understand the necessity of change to cope with new competitive realities, they often misunderstand what it takes to bring it about.

    Read More

  • Good To Great Essay

    1438 Words  | 3 Pages

    In Good to Great, Jim Collins discusses major key points companies have used to go from a good company to a great one. He did this by discussing seven characteristics companies should listen and absorb to transition from being good to becoming great. These characteristics included: level 5 leadership, first who…then what, confront the brutal facts, the hedgehog concept, a culture of discipline and the flywheel. Companies who can approach these successfully are the ones who enable themselves to separate from other competing companies. Furthermore, the statement Jim Collins said, which caught my attention immediately, was not in these seven characteristics, but in the first chapter of the book. He stated, “Good is the enemy of great.” This sentence consisting of six words I believed was most powerful throughout the book. Having said this, he discusses how typically companies are satisfied with just good, good is good, no one ever tries to take another step to try and become great. While this book is discussing businesses, it also applies to everyday life; am I doing everything to be great, or am I too just satisfied with good? Reflecting back on past work, school and overall experiences, it came to my attention not all the time did I try and be great, for I was content with good, good was good for me. I never took an extra stride to try and become great at what I was doing. Chapter 1, I felt to be the most influential, it truly grasped my attention and made me think to never settle for just good because someone else out there is taking extra steps to be great. Moreover, while all the characteristics have a significant meaning in the text and assist one another in transitioning companies from good to great, the Hedgehog Concept is on...

    Read More

  • Research Analysis: A Discussion of the Four Worldviews

    2174 Words  | 5 Pages

    Zikmund, W., Babin, B.J., Carr, J.C., & Griffin, M. (2010). Business research methods (8th ed.). Mason, OH: Thomson/South-Western

    Read More

  • Changes of Police Culture

    1395 Words  | 3 Pages

    Kotter, J. P. (2007). ‘Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail’. Harvard Business Review, January: 96-103.

    Read More

  • Good To Great

    1048 Words  | 3 Pages

    Great companies first focus on choosing people who will benefit the company in the short run and in the long run. They focus on getting the right people on the team while getting the wrong people off before setting up the platform as to where the company will move towards. The right people are those who don't need to be tightly managed or persuaded in order for them to perform at the best of their abilities. They are self-motivated and willing to give their best work to create or be part of something important. When choosing the right person, great companies look not only for specific knowledge and skill, but also evaluate the innate capabilities, values, and traits of the person. Choosing the right people is also applicable at the higher level positions of a great company. The leaders of these great companies are not focused on the celebrity aspect of their position, but rather are incredibly humble and totally dedicated to developing excellence in their organization. They credit success to factors other than themselves and take the blame when things go wrong. Great leaders also have a unique way to deal with their employees. They create a legitimate and personal relationship with their employees that results in employee awareness of when they are being an asset to the company or when they are not performing to standards. Leaders must not hesitate to deal with low performers and take whatever means necessary to ensure that only high performing people are involved in reaching the goals of the company. In essence, a leader's way of promoting hard work, communicating high expectations, and serving as a source of drive and inspiration contributes to the overall success of any great company.

    Read More

  • Porters Analysis- Albertsons

    1205 Words  | 3 Pages

    CEO Johnston also has plans to bolster the company’s leadership with the best minds available and also use motivational techniques to invigorate his employees. These ideas show the character of the CEO in enhancing productivity from his work force.

    Read More

  • Essay On Organisational Culture

    1246 Words  | 3 Pages

    It brought organisational culture to the performance of a company, which has become a critical topic in management department. In addition to organisational culture, organisations need to be aware and prepared for changes in the expanding workforce as business grows. Companies are faced with maximizing benefits as well as profits while minimizing negative factors that come from those changes. There is no one answer to the issue, but some of the guidelines are clear. Awareness of organisational culture, teamwork, individual performance, external environment adaptation, leadership, and measurement of organisational culture are key factors that lead a company to perform better.

    Read More

  • The Leadership of Nelson Mandela

    2391 Words  | 5 Pages

    In the twenty first century, leaders are required to build a greater impression in which people believe in strategy, trust in management decisions, and trust in their work. Once people believe in management choice, there will be enthusiasm inside an organisation. Such an environment helps the organisation growing or flourish. A doing well leaders create a surroundings in cooperation inside and outside the organisation. (Subir chowdbhury management, 21c financial times prentice hall (2000)

    Read More

More about Good To Great - Management According To Collins

Open Document