Good And Evil Essay: Good Vs. Evil

2932 Words6 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: A discussion on nurture/nature

The debate between good versus evil as innate traits in humans are disputed about whether one trait dominates over another, whether homeostasis is the case at birth, or whether neither exists at the time of a baby’s first breath. It is a common situation to disagree on the origins of these arguments based upon one’s beliefs whether they are of religious, moral, or economical value. However, despite these contradicting views, one theme remains consistent and true, and agreed upon, throughout all human history: everyone has his or her own convictions. Steinbeck uses this generalization as a platform for his belief that virtue and vice are both innate characteristics, and this conflict between good versus evil is the one and only battle humans fight throughout life and throughout the continuum of time in which humans have existed. Steinbeck illustrates that evil without exception is an omnipresent and unavoidable trait for all humans. Every creature is born evil, but Steinbeck demonstrates in East of Eden that every human possesses the innate ability to overcome it through personal choice by differing perceptions of reality based upon disillusioned fragments, imaginary realism, and personal choices. This ability to overcome is the good in all humans.
Throughout the novel, Steinbeck explores perception, from nature, nurture, or unique circumstance, as a median to disillusionment. Perception is the primary factor in effectively determining the differences between right and wrong, as dictated by societal norms and the relentless convictions of “good” humans think of as “right” throughout history. He highlights this belief through irrational views conveyed by Adam, the protagonist, and, paradoxically, these views that Adam himself view...

... middle of paper ...

...al ailments or obvious historical parallelisms subtly occurring deliberately in reality. Evil cannot be escaped. All humans possess it. All humans can overcome it. This ability to overcome is the good in all humans: “We only have one story… Vice has always a new fresh young face, while virtue is venerable as nothing else in the world is” (Steinbeck 443). Good is immortal, and it survives by our choices, whilst evil dies off when overused, like Cathy does, and only comes back when deliberate ignorance and naiveté are introduced, as well as self-induced, into perspective. Adam and Abel represent the essence of the human – good and evil. Evil is the Cathy that humans must overcome with righteous choices. Charles and Cal are the examples that prove overcoming innate evil with moral choices on a day-to-day basis is a certain possibility, a tough road, and a worthy path.

Show More
Related

  • John Steinbeck's East of Eden - Good Versus Evil

    976 Words  | 2 Pages

    The idea of good versus evil is illustrated in several ways in John Steinbeck's East of Eden. This is seen through the external conflicts in the novel, the internal conflicts of the characters, and a universal understanding of the battle between good and evil.

    Read More

  • Examples Of Transcendentalism In The Crucible

    1027 Words  | 3 Pages

    Throughout the past centuries, the concept of instinctive morality has been debated back and forth. One philosophy with a strong viewpoint on this subject is Puritanism, because they believe that since the beginning of the world, people have been born sinners. Puritans felt that Adam and Eve’s temptation by Satan had cursed all of humanity to be born evil. A few decades later, Deists shifted their ideas away from religion and believed that every person could choose whether they were good or bad. Then, Transcendental ideas began the thought that humans were born innately good, and that God and Satan had nothing to do with people’s morality. Throughout the major literary philosophies in the United States, one can see how the innate character of a human progresses from being evil to being innately good.

    Read More

  • John Steinbeck's East of Eden - Biblical Symbols and Symbolism

    1254 Words  | 3 Pages

    Throughout the novel East of Eden, Steinbeck uses many biblical references to illustrate clearly the conflict between the opposing forces of good and evil. Much of the plot of East of Eden is centered upon the two sets of brothers representing Cain and Abel.  Both pairs are similar to Cain and Abel in the way they go about winning their fathers’ favors.  All four give gifts to their fathers, and the fathers dismiss the gifts of Charles and Caleb, the Cain representations (Marks, Jay Lester. p.121).  Caleb and Charles Trask are obviously the more malignant brothers.  They are also the more loving towards their father.  Steinbeck’s purpose in this is to illustrate the need of the Cain character in the story.  Abel, Adam and Aron, is the opposite of his brother and naturally good and pure.  The purpose of Adam and Aron in East of Eden is to clarify the belief that purity must know wickedness (Marks, Jay Lester. p.122).  Steinbeck illustrates the need for both good and bad with the actions and beliefs of these supposed “good” characters.  The representations of Abel, Adam and Aron are both described as unloving.  Adam has not treated his children fairly and his treatment is caused by his innate goodness.  Aron grows as an ignorant selfish person because he is naturally good (Fonterose, Joseph.  p. 3382).   Steinbeck uses Cain to illustrate the choice man has.  In the case of Charles, Cain dies an unhappy man who did not live a worthwhile life, Caleb on the other hand, chose to realize his dark past, but chose to continue living his life with hope (Marks, Jay Lester.  p. 122-123).

    Read More

  • The Significance of Sibling Rivalry in Steinbeck's East of Eden

    1394 Words  | 3 Pages

    The struggle of sibling rivalry over ability and temperament has taken East of Eden in a whole new perspective. Steinbeck’s portrait on sibling rivalry shows the good vs. evil of each character in the story. The nature of good vs. evil as natural selection is also seen in siblings, as a compete for something physical, mental, or something emotional. The sibling rivalry from the biblical characters embraced Steinbeck’s characters throughout every concept in the novel, the good vs. evil confines the characters personality in every idea of Steinbeck’s novel. From the biblical story of Cain and Abel to Adam and Charles to Cal and Aaron the story continues through out every generation.

    Read More

  • East of Eden, by John Steinbeck: The Events After the Fall of Adam

    1225 Words  | 3 Pages

    “I believe there are monsters born in the world . . . misshapen and horrible . . . accidents and no one’s fault . . . punishments for concealed sins . . . [their] face and body may be perfect . . . ” but they are the product of “a twisted gene or a malformed egg . . . ” (71). Literature, throughout history, has conveyed a plethora of themes, ranging from the struggle to understand divine intervention, to adversity, to the dramatization of life and death. One of the most prestigious and conventional of these themes is the conflict betwixt good and evil. Demonstrated through many works of literary merit, this divergence intensely sears the pages of history dating as far back as the Biblical story of Adam and Eve. Although this idea is deeply rooted in the past, its relevancy is not depleted, still serving as one of the most controversial topics known to man. Author John Steinbeck procured a fascination with this controversy, and ultimately produced his most ambitious work, East of Eden, to create a symbolic history that would possess significance for all. John Steinbeck’s East of Eden fundamentally captures the essence of the battle between good and evil through the dramatic use of symbolism, which insinuates the Biblical story of Adam and Eve, and the poisonous rivalry between their sons, Cain and Abel.

    Read More

  • Good Vs. Evil In The Monkey's Paw

    772 Words  | 2 Pages

    At some point in their lifetime, a person obtains possession over a power they have not had once before. This single source could range anywhere from being able to choose a morning outfit to having three magical wishes. The power could come from within or an outside source, and how they use it determines what they perceive to world to be. From here, their morals become tested on whether to use this authority for selfish reasons or to do what is right. Good vs. evil dates back to the biblical literary figures, Adam and Eve, along with the “tree of bad and good” (Schachter 73). With many different versions of this encounter, the theme remains the same. In W.W. Jacobs’ short story “The Monkey’s Paw,” the narrator uses symbolism through parts of the setting, reiterating numbers, and objects that relate to biblical aspects as well as known morals.

    Read More

  • Elie Wiesel Good Vs Evil

    641 Words  | 2 Pages

    "The line between good and evil is permeable and almost anyone can be induced to cross it when pressured by situational forces"~Philip Zimbardo. It is hard to not cross the line between good and evil because if someone is getting you mad, you might want to harm them in some way. But you have keep your cool and let it go. Being good or evil is your own choice. Even if you are good, you always have an evil side. This quote fits perfectly because it talks about how evil is really only in people under certain situations. People are essentially good, but under certain circumstances, turn evil.

    Read More

  • Comparing John Locke and Thomas Hobbes

    1242 Words  | 3 Pages

    Many people have different views on the moral subject of good and evil or human nature. It is the contention of this paper that humans are born neutral, and if we are raised to be good, we will mature into good human beings. Once the element of evil is introduced into our minds, through socialization and the media, we then have the potential to do bad things. As a person grows up, they are ideally taught to be good and to do good things, but it is possible that the concept of evil can be presented to us. When this happens, we subconsciously choose whether or not to accept this evil. This where the theories of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke become interesting as both men differed in the way they believed human nature to be. Hobbes and Locke both picture a different scene when they express human nature.

    Read More

  • The Possibility Of Evil Essay

    865 Words  | 2 Pages

    Shirley Jackson’s short story “ The Possibility of Evil” is about a little old lady named Miss Strangeworth. She thinks she’s in charge of the town and to make sure it’s free from all evil because her grandfather built the first house on Pleasant Street. At first Miss Strangeworth is a nice little old lady, worrying about people and wondering what others are up to. Then in the middle of the story she becomes a little rude to a few of the townspeople. In the end Miss Strangeworth thought she was getting rid of the evil in the town, but in reality she was causing evil in the town by showing her true colors and being extremely mean and cruel to others. Don’t judge a book by it’s cover because people aren’t always what they seem to be.

    Read More

  • On the Genealogy of Morality

    1185 Words  | 3 Pages

    Friedrich Nietzsche’s “On the Genealogy of Morality” includes his theory on man’s development of “bad conscience.” Nietzsche believes that when transitioning from a free-roaming individual to a member of a community, man had to suppress his “will to power,” his natural “instinct of freedom”(59). The governing community threatened its members with punishment for violation of its laws, its “morality of customs,” thereby creating a uniform and predictable man (36). With fear of punishment curtailing his behavior, man was no longer allowed the freedom to indulge his every instinct. He turned his aggressive focus inward, became ashamed of his natural animal instincts, judged himself as inherently evil, and developed a bad conscience (46). Throughout the work, Nietzsche uses decidedly negative terms to describe “bad conscience,” calling it ugly (59), a sickness (60), or an illness (56); leading some to assume that he views “bad conscience” as a bad thing. However, Nietzsche hints at a different view when calling bad conscience a “sickness rather like pregnancy” (60). This analogy equates the pain and suffering of a pregnant woman to the suffering of man when his instincts are repressed. Therefore, just as the pain of pregnancy gives birth to something joyful, Nietzsche’s analogy implies that the negative state of bad conscience may also “give birth” to something positive. Nietzsche hopes for the birth of the “sovereign individual” – a man who is autonomous, not indebted to the morality of custom, and who has regained his free will. An examination of Nietzsche’s theory on the evolution of man’s bad conscience will reveal: even though bad conscience has caused man to turn against himself and has resulted in the stagnation of his will, Ni...

    Read More

  • Evil is Not Inherent: A Persuasive Essay

    1147 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the world of the living, evil is not inherent and can change or influence a person’s aspect of the world based on the community they are in. Evil is the force of things that are morally wrong and the matter of suffering, wrongdoing and misfortune (Merriam Webster). Evil is not inherent because an evil community can change or influence a person’s way of thinking, can consume people the more they are relinquished to it, and can mold a person when a person has power or feel a certain way. Furthermore, evil can be claim as not inherent from reading about Josef Mengele, Stanley Milgram, and the Stanford Prison Experiment. I will persuade my point that evil is not inherent from the sources that depicts the claim of evil.

    Read More

  • Inherently Evil Lord Of The Flies Quote Analysis

    790 Words  | 2 Pages

    Mankind is innately evil. The allegorical novel, The Lord of the Flies, allows for little interpretation about human nature. William Golding depicts the idea, “evil is an inborn trait of man” (Golding). Throughout the novel the children who have crash landed on the island begin to uncover their savage nature. Although all of the children somehow succumb to a heinous behaviour, Jack, Ralph, and Roger become most noticeably corrupt. Ultimately, it becomes clear that malicious intent is intrinsic in mankind.

    Read More

  • Adaption Means Survival in Elie Wiesel's "Night" and William Golding's "Lord of the Flies"

    2684 Words  | 6 Pages

    Charles Darwin, the famous evolutionist, once wrote: "In the struggle for survival, the fittest win out at the expense of their rivals because they succeed in adapting themselves best to their environment.” It was this message that Elie Wiesel learned during his captivity in World War II and incorporated into his novel, ‘Night’. It was also this message that William Golding tried to express through the scenario of his magnum opus, ‘Lord of the Flies’. Though, in both their novels, there was another message, an idea first realized by the great psychologist and philosopher Sigmund Freud. The idea was that when man is taken away from civilization, his instincts (the id) will overpower his conscience (super-ego) and man will return to their original, primitive style of thinking. In common society, there is a word to describe the acts and feelings of a man in his primitive state, a word that takes on many different meanings depending on one’s belief, this word is evil. Both lord of the flies and Night portrays the nature of evil as something that naturally exists in the human soul which is only prevented from release by the chains of civilization. Though, once the structure of civilization is removed from the lives of men; ‘evil’ is unleashed and humans would return to their natural thinking process of the survival of the fittest. By analyzing the main characters in both novels and their experiences throughout the novels, it is proven that evil in its nature is nothing more than the acts and desires of a man in his primitive state of thinking.

    Read More

  • Innate Evil in Golding's Lord of the Flies

    688 Words  | 2 Pages

    This paper will explore the three elements of innate evil within William Golding's, Lord of the Flies, the change from civilization to savagery, the beast, and the battle on the island. Golding represents evil through his character's, their actions, and symbolism. The island becomes the biggest representation of evil because it's where the entire novel takes place. The change from civilization to savagery is another representation of how easily people can change from good to evil under unusual circumstances. Golding also explores the evil within all humans though the beast, because it's their only chance for survival and survival instinct takes over. In doing so, this paper will prove that Lord of the Flies exemplifies the innate evil that exists within all humans.

    Read More

  • THE SINFUL NATURE OF MEN IN WILLIAM GOLDING'S LORD OF THE FLIES

    1264 Words  | 3 Pages

    When anyone thinks of the word “evil” they do not think it is within themselves. In reality, without a structured and well-followed society, people are apt to follow their own corrupt desires and neglect the thought of consequence. In the allegory, Lord of the Flies, William Golding reveals that man’s selfishness and sinful nature will be unmasked when the structure of a society deteriorates.

    Read More

More about Good And Evil Essay: Good Vs. Evil

Open Document