Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Globalization—A double-edged Sword
Globalization—A double-edged Sword
role of globalization in the modern world
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Globalization—A double-edged Sword
Globalization is a social process independent of man’s will. It is also a dynamic development process with inner contradictions and a dual nature. Although it provides a rare historic opportunity for many countries to develop, it also creates differences, competition and conflicts of interest. Globalization’s contradictions and dual nature also exert a complicated influence on contemporary international relations.
While globalization deepens mutual dependence and further promotes this era’s trend toward peace and development, its nature of imbalance has led to the rise of power politics in the same period, complicating the process of multipolarization.
The acceleration of globalization has continually deepened mutual dependence and mutual penetration among countries in various areas, including the economic realm, and increased common interests. In competitive and frictional relations among big powers, cooperation and interaction have appeared. The ability of a single country to unilaterally settle and dominate international affairs has declined. Any country that willfully employs foreign interference, sanctions and war to undermine the interests of other countries will always find itself threatened. Therefore, in settling international conflicts, cooperation, coordination and seeking common interests have increasingly been adopted. The development of globalization is an important factor that has made the post-Cold-War international system relatively stable, playing a vital role in restricting all-out confrontation among big powers. This fact proves that peace and development will remain the theme of the era for quite a long time. Large-scale world war is avoidable and invigorating economic growth while seeking a more benefic...
... middle of paper ...
...eaking, globalization requires that international regimes play a stronger role in international relations under the auspices of effective international institutions. But almost all existing international organizations, such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the World Trade Organization (WTO), the United Nations and the Group-8, were founded during the Cold War and are dominated by Western powers. In the post-Cold War era, more and more people question the function and nature of these organizations, which seem incapable of settling new issues that are appearing in the process of globalization. In the next 15 years, reform or the complete overthrow of these regimes is unlikely because of the current structure of international political and economic forces, but violent debates surrounding the formulation and reform of international rules of conduct will proceed.
There is no question that states used to be the building blocks of the international system in the past because they had the sovereignty in the political, security, and social areas. However, with globalization, states are subjected to external influences and it is becoming questionable if states are still the fundamental actors of the international system. Cooperation is becoming a key motivation in the international system nowadays. ()This implies that states may have to sacrifice their policies to maintain universal standards of living or the international peace. Although states are still the ultimate power source, it is important to accept the fact that the idea of sovereignty is changing with globalism.
International politics traditionally focuses on the relationship between states and international organisations. Despite the fact that the geography may remain inert, the geopolitical situations in regions are shifting over time, and changes in global environment can make an influence on the regional powers. The world’s great powers are the main and decisive actors among states, which make an enormous influence on the processes of the international relationship. Throughout history, the world environment has demanded from nations to get more resources in order to develop their economy and military power. Therefore, countries struggled to get more possessions and territory in order to survive. A high developed economic industry
...balization increases political associations among a wide mixture of corporations and nations. Mosely and Klien discuss the repercussions of globalization and its influence on the nation state; they figuratively agree on the pressure it inflicts. Mosely quarrels on how globalization could limit and further accelerate government action. Klien argues on the restrictions and potential that globalization could promote. I believe that globalization, further facilitates government interventions; the existence of domestic structures can discard or allow any notion of globalization. Globalization has surely made an impact to both developing and developed nations, only causing them to adapt.
Niam, M. (2008). The Five Wars of Globalization. In K. A. Mingst, Essentials of International Relations (pp. 151-159). New York: W.W Norton& Company Inc.
Keohane argues that international institutions, “institutions that can be identified as related complexes of rules and norms, identifiable in space and time,” can encourage cooperation and create expectations for countries’ behavior (Axelrod & Keohane 1985). Right now, there are many international institutions in place, which aim to encourage cooperation and peace. For example, the United Nations plays a large role in facilitating cooperation between China and other nations. As a result, Neo-Liberal Institutionalism would argue that China will rise peacefully because institutions, like the U.N., are strong enough to prevent war. However, on the other hand, some may argue that these institutions are not effective enough in encouraging cooperation. For example, with the situation in the SCS, tensions continue to rise between the U.S. and China, Japan and China, and many other South East Asian countries. As a result, countries have been increasing their military presence in the region. China has begun militarizing islands, as well (CNN). The slow increases in conflict could lead to violence and the U.N. has not been able to solve this issues. In addition, Keohane stated that international institutions needed to be strong enough to incentivize cooperation and also needed to punish and prevent defectors. Recently, the international institutions have not been able to accomplish this. For example, China has
The system is so complex that a single theory can’t explain the entirety of it. Though , realism could play a major part in explaining it thus, the need for other theories is essential to give answer to the lapses that were not discussed by realism. In order to explain the current international system through the aforementioned theories. It is best to know first the current state of the global system in the 21st century.
The integration of independent states through organizations such as the United Nations, the EU and NATO have transformed the capabilities of the global community to establish international financial institutions, global sanctions, and treaties for common defense across multiple borders. Though these advancements have helped to achieve greater global unity, globalization has created many challenges for both defensive and financial stability. Globalization has made geographically separated threats a cause for European concern. Belligerent actions by North Korea, violence in South Asia, the ‘Arab Spring’ and conflicts in the Middle East; in addition to numerous failed states and militant non-state actors drive a financial, political, and often military response from developed nations. The inability of failed states and developing countries to establish a lawful order creates numerous human rights, security, and political issues for the EU to resolve (ESS, 2003, 8). As stated in the ESS, “Since 1990, almost 4 million people have died in wars, 90% of them civilians. Over 18 million people worldwide have lef...
Globalization can briefly be defined as ‘something’ that affects and changes the traditional arrangements of the state system. It is a term that directly implies change and therefore is a continuos process over a long period of time as compared to quickly changing into a wanted or desir...
The concept of globalization has challenged the study of International Relations from every aspect of the International Relations theory. Globalization has undermined everything philosophers have contributed to the theory of international relations. Unlike International Relations, globalization doesn’t focus on the types of actors, because that’s not important in globalizations systems. In this paper, I will reveal how states shifted from an international relations system into a system of globalization.
The relative differences in capabilities among states to meet their needs therefore results in distrust and fear within the international system. It is the fear that other states, with the capabilities, will become more powerful which result in the uneven globalization process and an uneven distribution of power in the international system. In addition, and supporting Waltz’s theory, neo-realists view globalization as a challenge but still see politics as international, and states as the principal actors in the international political arena. Their main concern, in regards to Globalization is uneven distribution of power, which results in inequality and therefore
There are many forms of globalization and I feel that one is just as important as the other, however, when talking about if they are for the best that gets a little more complicated. Some may seem they are doing the world a bit of good but in some eyes we could do with out them. In this paper I will pull a few of the types of globalization so its easier to see how they are more important than ever and how some are for the best and some not so much for the best.
Realist perspective explains globalization in terms of the relative distribution of power (Nau 2007, 278). In their opinion, trade and economic activities thrives “only under favorable security conditions,” and those conditions rely on the relative distribution of power (Nau 2007, 279). They believe that alliances and hegemony are the two most affirmative security conditions. “’Free trade is more likely within than across political-military alliances; and …alliances have had a much stronger effect on trade in a bipolar than in to a multipolar world.’” (Nau 2007, 279) In other words, the fewer dominating states with power there are in the system, the stronger is the alliance and its effect on trade. In a multipolar world, countries cannot trust each other in trade because alliances are rarely permanent and therefore, countries might use the gains from trade to increase its military power and threaten to cause damage to the other country. Thus, realists argue that,
Since the late twentieth century, the world has experienced a vast transformation with regards to world economies, culture, and politics. The great advancements in technology and communication since the late twentieth century has served a catalysts for what is known today as globalization. The ambition to develop a single global economy along with a universal culture are the promises of globalization. Perhaps the clearest evidence that demonstrates globalization is a reality is the fact that at this point in time very diverse cultures form around the world closer to each other than ever before. That being said, when it comes to the spreading of democracy and human rights, having world cultures closer to each other can prove to be beneficial
The international system is an anarchical system which means that, unlike the states, there is no over ruling, governing body that enforces laws and regulations that all states must abide by. The International System in today’s society has become highly influential from a number of significant factors. Some of these factors that will be discussed are Power held by the state, major Wars that have been fought out in recent history and international organisations such as the U.N, NATO and the W.T.O. Each of these factors, have a great influence over the international system and as a result, the states abilities to “freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social, and cultural development”.
Al-Rodhan, Nayef. Definitions of Globalization:A Comprehensive Overview and a Proposed Definition. Geopolitical Implications of Globalization and Transnational Security . Geneva: GCSP, 2006.