Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
global warming myth or reality
how global warming is a lie
Global warming is a myth research
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: global warming myth or reality
For many years we have been hearing about how the world was going to end if we do not clean up our acts and stop causing global warming. In reality, we actually are not harming the planet at all and it is all a hoax in order to help the government raise more money. They say with in an increase in CO2 and the earth’s temperature escalating we are doomed for the world to eventually go down in flames. On the contrary, the multiple unscholarly reports have been used as scare tactics when we actually have little to nothing to worry about. One of the biggest scams they try to pull off is the fact that CO2 is increasing. The government blames in on the human species. There is actually no proof that humans have increased CO2 production. Scientist …show more content…
(Redsliverj) They say that this represents all scientist, not just environmentalist. That percentage comes from a U.N. panel. It is in part with a government ran panel called the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). There were 4,000 scientist that were on the panel but not all of them reviewed the report. Some of the names on the consensus were also duplicated so if one took away the names duplicated than it is less than 2,900 scientist. (Redsliverj) Some of those scientist do not even have their PhD yet. One cannot accurately represent the whole scientific community with only around 4,000 people. It is not correct to say that almost every scientist believes in climate change. The scientist are supposed to be unbiased but many of the scientist that were in connection with the consensus are also closely connected with the World Wildlife Fund. A program specifically designed to help stop the “carbon footprint” that humans are leaving on this earth. It is virtually impossible for those people to be unbiased towards climate …show more content…
(Redsliverj) The report is found on every day news channels but is not reviewed by scientist. It was an online survey with two questions. The first question being “When comparted with pre-1800 levels, do you think that mean global temperatures have generally risen, fallen, or remained relatively constant?” The second question was “Do you think human activity is a significant contributing factor in changing global temperatures?” They sent the survey out to 10,257 people and only 3,146 received the actual survey. (Redsliverj) Only 77 of those 3,146 scientist actually specialized in climate science. (Redsliverj) Of the 77 climate scientist, 75 agreed with number two, which is where they get their 97% consensus. (Redsliverj) They did not take the opinion of the other scientist that took the survey which makes the survey completely and totally biased. The consensus was rigid in order to favor the government in order to raise money for the politicians. They hid the actual final results of the research in order to cover up how unscholarly it was. Although some of the people on the panels are scientist, most of them are government officials who are known for wanting to raise money at any cost. Global warming was a scare tactic created by the government in order to enforce grants and programs that would give them money. There is no signs of it actually happening and if it is how can we actually believe what they are saying? There are so
Unfortunately, scientist are still searching for the missing puzzle pieces when it comes to solving the global warming hiatus. Here is what I did find in the article that seemed to be aligned with other articles;
The argument put forward by John Coleman, in his article “Global Warming Greatest Scam in History!”, is flawed mainly due to numerous logical fallacies. “Ad Hominem”, “Guilt by Association”, “Red Herring”, “Appeal to Irrelevant Authority”, “Hasty Generalization”, and “Genetic Fallacy” are some of the logical fallacies that can be observed to prevail in Coleman’s argument. As a consequence, the soundness, validity, clarity, reasoning and consistency of the whole article are insubstantial. Coleman’s premises fail to support his proposition that global warming is a scam, making the whole argument distorted and faulty.
Today, some scientists are skeptical about the consensus on climate change. This can be compared to a situation in ancient times, where the majority of people believed the earth was flat, and only a minority dared to question that consensus. These challengers note that something not known is how much does the earth’s atmosphere respond to added carbon dioxide (McNider and Christy). This means that no one has any idea of what CO2 levels did to the earth’s climate before meaningful history. So, as many sci...
Climate change is considered a controversial topic. Although scientists have been studying the issue, there are many citizens that are still not fully educated about it. Therefore, there are people who support scientists in their results, and there are people who deny the scientists’ findings as propaganda or exaggerations. This is the same issue even in politics, where the two main parties, Democrats and Republicans, have opposing perspectives on climate change. One can really tell just by looking at their approach to the issue, especially their tone and diction. The republican candidates doubts climate change, and when the topic is brought up during an interview, the republicans flatly deny it with no further discussion. They do give some
Wile, R. (2012, July 30). Everyone’s Talking About The Koch Brothers-Funded Study That Proves Climate Change Is Real Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/koch-brothers-funded-study-proves-climate-change-2012-7#ixzz30ssBeLyg. Business Insider. Retrieved from http://www.businessinsider.com/koch-brothers-funded-study-proves-climate-change-2012-7#!I8rla
I do believe that global warming is happening. The data that I have seen does suggest that there is a natural cause to global warming. There is also data I have seen that also supports the human cause of global warming. The amount of CO2 and other greenhouse gases humans are propelling into the atmosphere and into our oceans is un-natural. The balance is thrown off because of our use of fossil fuels and deforestation. It does not make sense to me for people to defend fossil fuels and delay new green alternatives, knowing they will run out in the future. Hendrickson and Sussman both seem to have cherry picked their facts they presented, making global warming seem like a hoax, but I don’t buy their arguments.
It makes sense that if a large group of trustworthy people believe that something is true, that it is true. This is not always the case though. To make this argument more sound, climate change skeptics should move away from relying on a large support of people toward a large support of facts. For example, it would be far more credible to say that ‘37,487 scientists found through different experiments that the Earth’s temperature has been stable for 200 years.’ Using appeal to popularity got the climate change skeptics in trouble as well. In order to feed the appeal to popularity and include more names on the list, they allowed anyone with a Bachelor of Science degree or higher in any subject to sign the petition. Many questioned whether some of the signatories had sufficient knowledge in order to have an objective opinion of the subject. Therefore, many saw through this appeal to popularity and saw the absence of fact. In effect, they ruined their own
Though the scientific evidence seems overwhelming in favor of global warming, there are those, for various reasons, who believe that global warming is a hoax or not empirically verified. According to Renee Cho, who posted an article on the website, phys.org, four years ago, 23 percent of Americans did not believe global warming was happening and 33 percent believed that if it was happening, it was mostly caused by natural changes in the environment. An improvement from 2013, seventy percent of Americans now believe global warming is occurring, and more than half understand that it is mainly caused by human activity, a new report reveals. A 2017 survey reveals that 13 percent of Americans still do not believe global warming is happening,
A lot of people also believe that climate change is not real. One piece of evidence that climate change is a hoax is that as of 2008, only 39 out of every 100,000 molecules of air were
The opposing party would like you to believe that the scientists are 90% certain that extreme heat periods will increase worldwide. They say that this is causing increased danger of wildfires, human deaths, and algal blooms. This of course is utterly false on many different levels. These scientists that the opposing party was actually paying a select group of scientists to testify for them meaning the “90% of Scientists” were actually lying because they were being paid off. The real majority agreed against these paid scientists, but they were not included in the vote for agreement in this statistic. These statistics are not nearly as dire as described because they won’t happen. This is because the CO2 emissions are no where near to where they are portrayed in the Al Gore video.
Many people dedicate their lives to spread the message about climate change being real. Even though some change in the climate is natural, many events that have happened cannot be explained away by nature. Climate change is causing damage to the world that is completely irreversible. Nasa says, “Most scientists say it 's very likely that most of the warming since the mid-1900s is due to the burning of coal, oil and gas. Burning these fuels is how we produce most of the energy that we use every day” (nasa). The energy that we use daily makes our life easier, but it hurts the earth. Why does the government still allow us to use these things? Science has shown us that sea levels are rising in many parts of the world. Warm weather is causing glaciers to melt which results in the sea level rising. Earth 's average temperature has been rising for the last century in a half; and there has also been a steady rise in ocean temperature since 1969. It is said that climate control is man made and it is dangerous. On the other side of the argument, many people do not believe that climate change is real. They argue that their has not been a big temperature change in almost two decades. They also bring up the point of there not being enough data in the climate history to draw the conclusion of what is happening in the climate now is abnormal. Scientist started to record climate change around the 1800’s which many people believe is not enough data to do a comparison. Another reason some believe that climate change is not real is because of some instances where a scientist predicts a date of a significant climate change never happens. Rinkesh writes, “ For example:- Al Gore predicted that all Arctic ice would be gone by 2013. But, on contrary Arctic ice is up by 50% since 2012” (conserve-energy-future). Many people find that these reasons are why climate change is not
There are still some believers that support that climate change is not real and that they are just made up facts so people can grab the opportunity to make money with new products that will help the world to become “cleaner.” Their arguments are that the earth always had these types of climate changes just like a natural cycle. When asked about if there is any link on how in the past decades, when humans started using fossil fuels and the changes became worst and worst, they come with a response that it is just a
Picture this: Your freezer breaks down. The temperature inside the freezer rises. The ice cubes start to melt and turn into liquid. The freezer starts to flood because of all the liquid from the ice cubes. Now, imagine that your freezer is the Earth. What your freezer has just experienced is similar to what happens to the Earth during global warming. Those who believe in global warming warn that it causes a significant rise in temperature in the Earth's atmosphere and oceans, but after doing much research on the topic, I have discovered that the threat of global warming is a bogus one. If the Earth's atmosphere was truly rising in temperature, we would see a significant rise in ice sheets melting, just like the ice cubes melted, but that is not occurring. In saying that global warming is occurring, scientists are just exaggerating that fact.
As Robert Frost once said, “ Some say the world will end in fire, some say in ice. From what I’ve tasted of desire I hold with those who favor fire.” This excerpt can relate to the idea of global warming. Global warming can be defined as an increase in the earth's average atmospheric temperature that causes corresponding changes in climate and that may result from the greenhouse effect. During the past 10,000 years the earth has been in an ever-growing cycle that has significantly changed the climate. These changes are becoming more prevalent in our world today in the past 150 years. Scientists have been analyzing the causes and effects of the greenhouse effect and many other issues that global warming has presented. As John Houghton states in his book, Global Warming the Complete Briefing, on page 2 “ The 1980s and 1990s were unusually warm. Globally speaking, the decades have been the warmest since accurate records began somewhat over a hundred years ago and these unusually warm years are continuing into the twenty-first century.” There are countless records that show that our world as a whole is getting warmer, and the facts cannot be disputed. Everyone in the world today is experiencing the effects of global warming. These effects might be small now, but if we don’t protect our planet now then the consequences will greatly be increased.
Scientists are of the opinion that matters of global warming cannot be based on mere consensus. In addition to this, they also claim that up to date, there has been no single experiment that can solidly claim that the effect of global warming is actually taking place. To that extend, their allegations remains very true because even the existing computerized models and patterns have greatly differed from what is actually happening. For example, in establishing the temperature changes, you find that the experiments carried out have no sufficiency demanded by basic rules of science. Naturally the world temperature is greatly influenced by ocean currents. Despite of this fact, nearly 90% of all the temperature measuring equipment is placed on dry lands. This result to the question of how helpful is such information because according to science the actual thing has not been measured. The difficulty existing in measuring temperatures in ocean currents has not been well accomplished and thus according to the scientists’ argument ...