Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ancient Greek sports influence modern society
The role of sports in society
Social implications of sports
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ancient Greek sports influence modern society
Reid’s thesis is in convincing the reader that gladiators under contemporary Roman values and Stoicism are able to transcend their social standings and display virtuous behaviour matching “Olympian style athletes” (Reid 2006: p. 38). She argues that in the Stoic Roman sense, gladiators were athletes, but their contest fails to be a sport while using the Greek model for reference (Reid 2006: p. 37). She breaks it down into three categories: Athletes or Entertainers, Slaves or Volunteers and Heroes or Murders and using the doctrine of Stoicism and Roman values she shows that gladiators while not being voluntary participants are capable of getting better social standing and gain virtue if they accept their position (Reid 2006: p. 38,41). She …show more content…
The point is that sports and athleticism are a platform made in order to display the benevolence of the aristocrats as a way to solidify their positions. The concept of athleticism and sports is not distinct. The reason we choose the Greeks model rather than the Roman model is mainly due to the admiration of their work and therefore the appropriation of their culture is quick to follow, as people tend to take what is most interesting about a particular culture. We have witnessed this throughout the whole course in the way sport similarities have been found scattered, as in wrestling as seen in The Epic of Gilgamesh which is still practiced some 3800 years later all over the world (Sukava: June 4th). We do not appropriate things that do not resonate with our culture or will not have positive broader social and political ramifications for that culture (Sukava: June 24th). Therefore, the concept of show vs sport, entertainer vs athlete is not distinct; we have many anomalies in our world today that stand in testimony to that. Cirque Du Soleil 's performers are athletes. they hit the boxes that we generally consider to be in athleticism, but their field is considered a show -an act for entertaining. However, again would it also be inappropriate to call it a sport? Is it the comfort we find in saying that baseball, football and hockey are clear sports and that shows are clearly not sport but what excludes Cirque? It can be argued that it is a competition on a large scale that does not have an immediate reciprocation, the focus of excellence and spectacle, respectively athletes and audience centered (Sukava: June 24th). Although, I agree with Reid’s overall take on the munera, I feel as though the nuances of the intricate relationship that is with sport and
Education and intellectual discourse were accessories to athletic events. During competitions, spectators would engage in lectures and philosophic conversations concerning current events and other scholarly subjects. In fact, the Greek word for "gymnasium" was the same as the Greek word for "school (http://www.mediaconcerto.com/olympic/olympia/ideal_o.php, September 27, 2004)." Athletic events became a center of learning and exchange of ideas in Greek civilization.
Human nature during this time was rather inhuman. The gladiators were slaves, rebels, criminals, and Christians. They had to fight against each other. The fighters used anyway possible to win a fight. They had to because if they fought and made the crowd happy and get the emperor’s thumbs up; they can be released and live their life again. If the gladiator did not make crowd h...
The essence of the bloodthirsty entertainment was in the form of the gladiator. The word gladiator comes from the Latin for swordsman, from gladius or sword. The first gladiators were part of a sacrificial rite adopted from the Etruscans in 264, BC, nearly 500 years after the founding of Rome (Johnston 238). The sons of Junius Brutus first displayed gladiatorial combat when they honored their father at his funeral by matching three pairs of gladiators. Gladiatorial combat was originally part of a religious ceremony that was intended to insure that the dead would be accompanied to the "next world" by armed attendants and that the spirits of the dead would be appeased with his offering of blood (Johnston 286). Gladiators were generally condemned criminals, prisoners of war or slaves bought for this purpose. By the end o...
During their travels the Trojans often played games and had competition, this principle of honor and competition would develop a type of mastery within the nation. But even so competition is a catalyst for anger and hatred that can boil men’s blood, so did it build or break the Roman empire? In either case it happened, which did improve the men’s strength from athletic competitions and grew the culture immensely, but also inspired a competition that had the ability to ruin the people’s love for each-other. In addition this competition has inspired western culture even today with the Olympics and sports. Aeneas’ men were inspired and motivated in their competition which led them to pushing and working harder than their normal capacity would allow, so this competition helped the people work harder than thought possible. Although the side-effects of things like this could be problematic the good that comes from it outweighs the problems, and it is a principle for nations to seek out correctly. In conclusion the competition of the Romans inspired men and women to go beyond their natural capacities and do great things for their nation, proving that it acted as a type of masterful competition against one’s
...m. This huge circular arena was the pinnacle of the Roman Gladiatorial games, and though it isn't fully intact, it is a great reminder of ancient culture. Though today these games seem inhumane and unnecessary, to their ancient culture it was a vacation from everyday stress. Even the Emperor was said to understand that though money and grain would satisfy and individual, large spectacles were necessary for the contentment of the masses' (wes civ).
Roman gladiators are often recalled when thinking of the Roman civilization for several reasons, including the extreme brutality of the gladiatorial games that took place. These games took place at funerals and ceremonies, as an offering of blood.
The Gladiators – History’s Most Deadly Sport. New York: St. Martin’s Press/Thomas Dunne Books, 2003. Potter, David S. and David J. Mattingly, eds. Life, Death and Entertainment in the Roman Empire. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1998.
The world that Homer shows in the Iliad is a violent one, where war is not only a means of gaining wealth, but also the arena in which a man demonstrates his worth. The Greek army gathered in front of the walls of Troy exhibits the weaknesses and strengths of the Homeric world. Greece is not one nation, and the army of Greeks mirrors this. It is a collection of small city-states with a common culture and a common language, capable of coming together for a great enterprise, but also capable of being driven apart by petty squabbling. The common culture is based on acceptance of characteristics seen as virtuous: xeineia, or hospitality; agathos, the successful warrior; oikos, which means from noble birth; keleos, glory; pine, honor, which is a central motif throughout the Iliad; and finally, the ultimate virtue of arête, which stands for goodness or excellence and encompasses the other virtues. For Homer, a good man must be of noble family, strong, brave in battle, and wealthy. Earthly possessions show that a man has initiative and has the esteem of others. But the most important qualification to be considered a good man is honor, because honor is gained, not born into.
These games were originally a form of human sacrifice associated with the solemn rites surrounding death for the Etruscan people. The Roman’s adapted the games not as a form of human sacrifice yet did keep them closely tied with their funerary origins. These gladiatorial games were not an exotic side show for the Romans but an entertainment that was integral to their culture. The games became a virtual symbol of what it meant to be Roman. From the very beginning of their history at Rome, gladiatorial games were closely associated with funerals. So much so that the presentation of gladiatorial combat was called a munus. This is a Latin word that means duty or gift and by extension funeral honors or an obligation performed for the dead. The first known gladiatorial combat held in Rome was at the funeral of a Roman aristocrat, D. Junius Brutus Pera. The combat was presented in 264 BC by two sons to honor their father. Pliny the Younger writes in the early second century CE to his friend Maximus:
The Trojan War veterans of The Odyssey succeeded in defeating their enemies on the battlefield. The end of combat did not mean relief from burdens for them. War is cruel, but in it these men see a glory they cannot find outside. Achilleus’ death in war is treated with ceremony and respect. Agamemnon, having survived that same war, dies a pitiful death and Klytaimestra “was so hard that her hands would not/ press shut [his] eyes and mouth though [he] was going to Hades” (XI, 425-426). Dying at home meant being denied even simple acts of dignity. Reflecting back on it Hades, Agamemnon characterizes the veteran’s struggles when he asks, “What pleasure was there for me when I had wound up the fighting?” (XXIV, 95).
Gladiator’s were men who became professional fighters specialising in fighting with weapons. Gladiator’s were known to fight in large purpose-built arenas for the public to view throughout the Roman Empire from 105 BCE to 404 CE (official contests).
see such a custom as cruel, it was in fact made less so than it
Hopkins, K. (2012, October 11). Murderous games: Gladiatorial contests in ancient Rome. History Today. Retrieved January 29, 2014, from http://www.historytoday.com/keith-hopkins/murderous-games-gladiatorial-contests-ancient-rome
Much like today’s athletes gladiators competed with one another to decide a victor and is a form of entertainment for people spectating. But Gladiators competed much different than professional athletes do today. Gladiators were forced to fight for the entertainment of others and were considered slaves (“ The Roman Gladiator”). Gladiators did not just fight for friendly sport either they had to fight to the death. This made the gladiatorial games so exciting for the people watching. The people loved to watch others fight and the gore that they would see while the gladiators were fighting. It may sound horrible in today’s society but back then it was the most prominent form of entertainment. Different from today’s athletes and entertainers, gladiators were slaves and were told what to do against their will. Much of the gladiators were slaves, criminals, and prisoners of war. Gladiatorial games were mostly held by the Roman Republic and forced there enemy’s to fight for their lives in the...
Throughout the history of the Republic, there was a difference between the gladiatorial contests and other forms of spectacular entertainment. The Romans did not invent the concept of gladiatorial fighting; there is some uncertainty as to the exact source. One ancient source says it was the Etruscans, a non-Indo-European people who lived directly north of the Romans.