Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Exegetical essay Isaiah 5:1-7
Reflection on the book of Isaiah
An exegetical paper from the book of Isaiah
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Exegetical essay Isaiah 5:1-7
13 an interpreter with regard to the prophet’s intention and his audience’s perception.38 For Gitay, the prophetic text is not a planned composition but a dynamic communicative discourse that can be deciphered on the basis of “its rhetorical situation and its global theme.”39 He argues, for example, that Isaiah 1-12 represents a series of speeches that have been arranged in a certain thematic and stylistic order for effective communication with the audience.40 Gitay attempts to discern both the persuasive intent of the prophet and the conscious rhetorical strategies of the prophetic discourse through which the speaker (or the writer) attempts to reach his listeners.41 There are some elements that should be considered in the process of rhetorical …show more content…
The use of the new literary critical approach contributes to the holistic reading of the Book of Isaiah by analyzing its stylistic, structural, and thematic features from a literary point of view. This approach provides interpreters with an important insight into the communicative function of the text, drawing their attention to the role of the reader/audience. Furthermore, new literary criticism enables interpreters to be attentive to the persuasive intents and effects of biblical text with literary sensitivity. Accordingly, the new literary approach sharpens the interpreters’ way of looking at the text in its complex literary world. In spite of the above contributions, there are some weak points that should be considered. The new literary approach tends to understand the Book of Isaiah only as a literary artifact, neglecting the referential nature external to it - such as theological and historical factors.48 Furthermore, the emphasis upon the decisive role of the reader in deciphering the meaning of the text is problematic because the reader controls the meaning of the text instead of the intention of the author. Accordingly,
It is the reader and his or her interpretive community who attempts to impose a unified reading on a given text. Such readers may, and probably will, claim that the unity they find is in the text, but this claim is only a mask for the creative process actually going on. Even the most carefully designed text can not be unified; only the reader's attempted taming of it. Therefore, an attempt to use seams and shifts in the biblical text to discover its textual precursors is based on a fundamentally faulty assumption that one might recover a stage of the text that lacked such fractures (Carr 23-4).
My essay will challenge the comparison and differentiation between a scene from the sacred text in The Hebrew Bible and The Yusuf Sura of the Koran. The scene I will be focusing is the one in which Joseph is seduced by the king’s wife. More specifically, I will be demonstrating that in the Koran good and evil are made explicit in the world of the story and for the reader, while the Bible suggest that you should identify good and evil for yourself.
Different approaches are required in order to get to the theology of the book. Unreserved evidences from the text itself provide the clear set of evidence that God is in fact behind the scenes preserving and sheltering His people. Several other definite items such as literary structure, writi...
Boadt, Lawrence. Reading the Old Testament, An Introduction. 2nd. Edited by Richard Clifford and Daniel Harrington. New York/Mahwah, New Jersey: Paulist Press, 2012.
The pericope of that I choose for this reflection paper is Isaiah 11:1-9. The preceding literature unit of this pericope focuses on the topic how God uses Assyria for His redemptive purpose. In Isaiah 10:5, Isaiah explains the role of Assyria in God’s plan. Assyria is the rod of God’s anger. He uses it to punish Israel and Judah because they are two godless nations but full of idols (Isaiah 10:6,11). After God’s angers are poured out on two countries, the heart of Assyria becomes boastful. God turns His anger on His rod and punishes Assyria. In Isaiah 10:12-19, Assyria is depicted as a mighty forest and the judgment of God is portrayed as an axe will swing and chop down this mighty forest. Assyria will be destroyed and reduced to a very small number that a child can count (Isaiah 10:19). After the section about the destruction of Assyria, the text turns to the proclamation of the return of the remnant of Israel. The focal point of the text zooms out in the last verse of Isaiah chapter 10 to bring forth the final scene in which the remnant of Israel will return to their land while in the background Assyria is destroyed. The once mighty forest is no more.
Biblical references are a technique used in literature by authors to alter readers perceptions. The readers beliefs are challenged by using biblical references in literature. In “The Gospel According to Mark” by Jorge Luis Borges, Borges uses many biblical references to give readers a different view of the main character. With the biblical references being used in “The Gospel According to Mark”, readers are able to portray the main character, Baltasar Espinosa as a Christ-like person. Borges’ use of biblical references is important because it allows him to challenge the reader’s religious beliefs.
...nd distorting, they can also be positive and clarifying and open up new insights to the realities of texts. Consider how many insights have come to light through the various interpretations of Scripture, Plato’s dialogues, and Augustine’s doctrines. As each interpreter faces the text, they bring with them their own questions and concerns related to their cultural context. These questions and concerns, along with the interpreter’s prejudices combine to make up a horizon. Finally, through the process of interpretation, the interpreter’s horizon will merge with the text’s horizon. Although this leaves the potential for distortions of the text’s interpretation, fusing the two horizons allows the text to take on new life and to begin a new dialogue. This dialogue may push the interpreter to question their own horizon, such that “Being that can be understood is language”.
The “hermeneutic activity –the practice of close reading” (373) is what Love evaluates next. The practice of close reading became the framework of hermeneutics in the early 20th century and has been the foundation of text evaluation since then, no matter what different literary approaches and cultural changes were present, since “the richness of texts continues to serve as a carrier for an allegedly superannuated humanism”(373). Her own assertion regarding the interpretation of texts can be interpreted in sev...
The notion of the author has often been disputed when it comes to critical literary studies. The argument centers around one basic question: Should the author be considered when looking at a text? There are numerous reasons given as to why the author is important or why the ...
The New Interpreter's Study Bible: New Revised Standard Version with the Apocrypha. Nashville: Abingdon Press, ©2003.
intertextuality. The concept of intertextuality, however, is still controversial among scholars because of its diverse claims and emphases.102 In this study we will consider intertextuality because it is concerned with a shared meaning of biblical texts that makes communication available between them. In this way, intertextuality offers a surplus of theologically meaningful possibilities between the texts. There are two principle loci where some sort of conversation is operative: literary associations and the broader complex of theological
The word prophet means to speak by delegated authority (Paterson 3). Prophets speak because they are commanded to by a higher power (Paterson 4). Their beliefs were the beliefs of the living god and to make god visible to their people (Paterson 8). They also believed that "life was unity and every thought and activity had to be brought into subjection to god (Paterson 9)." The prophets also stood for religious integrity (Paterson 10).
The Prophet is a book of short essays by Kahlil Gibran on a variety of themes ranging from love and marriage to pain and death presented by a character named Almustafa. By using a variety of rhetorical devices such as metaphors, similes, and imagery, he enhances the ideas presented in each section and makes them easier for the reader to comprehend and put into practice. Although written in 1923, all of the themes are still very relevant in today’s world, perhaps even more so.
Isaiah’s Messianic prophecies are more precise than any other writer’s in the Old Testament. He does not only give accurate details of the person and work of Jesus Christ, he also lived and wrote these prophecies hundreds of years before Jesus Christ was born. The central theme of the book is Salvation is of the Lord. In this paper, the identities of the corporate and individual Servants and also their mission as portrayed by Isaiah will be discussed. In the book of Isaiah, the concept of the servant is more complex than one would expect. In certain passages in Isaiah, the Servant appears to be more of a collective character rather than an individual, whereas in other passages, the nation of Israel is identified as the servant. Biblical scholars over the years have studied extensively and produced several theories to identify the Servant in the book of Isaiah. Is the Servant an individual or corporate? A proper understanding of the Servant and the mission provides a clearer insight concerning the plan of God in restoring His children.
Also, Biblical narrative includes groupings or numbers to represent symbolic meanings (Schnittjer 212). Furthermore, biblical narrators of the Pentateuch use repetition as a way of driving home a theme (Schnittjer 239). By understanding each literary device at the disposal of the writers, a reader can grasp the full theological meaning of the Scriptures. Also, Schnittjer points out, “The storyteller controls what readers hear and what they do not hear and how they hear what they hear” (Schnittjer 285). His point doubles down on the intentionality in which the Pentateuch was compiled. The greatest effort a reader can make is to understand the purpose of the