Firstly., the ambiguous relationship between adolescence and gifted underachievers has to be considered. John Doe is 15years old and is in mid adolescent years, this is arguably one of the main determining factors that contribute to John Doe’s underachievement. Research suggests that between the ages of 10 to 14 years there is a decline in academic achievement, (Compton, M.F, 1982). Adolescence is a critical time for youth development; it is transitional phase that poses a great challenge for all students. The emergence of identity, relationship needs, the need to achieve and autonomy play an important part in student learning during the period of adolescence. However, it is arguably a more challenging time for gifted students.
Zigler, E. and E.A. Farber. The Gifted and Talented Developmental Perspectives. Washington DC: American Psychological Association, 1985.
First, however, one must have a clear notion of what is meant by giftedness. Only the top 2-5 % of children in the world are truly gifted. These children are precocious, self-instructing, can intuit solutions without resorting to logical, linear steps, and have an incredible interest in an area or more that they focus so intently on, that they may lose sense of the outside world (3). Early reading and development of abstract thought are typical characteristics as well. The acceleration of ment...
Whether giftedness is a product of nature or created through nurture is a controversial discussion. However, Winner (2000), Colangelo & Davis (2003), Mrazik & Dombrowski (2010) all agree the answer lies somewhere in the middle. The idea of giftedness is often evaluated under the premise of expertness or mastery. Do all gifted children become masters or experts of their gifted area? Can people become gifted through extensive training (which is required for expertness)? Winner states that families cannot make a child become gifted, however, certain parenting styles that combine nurturance and stimulation can help maintain and nurture the gift. Winner reviewed many studies on hard work, perseverance, and practice, none of which can explain the origins of giftedness, but are very necessary for high achievement. Colangelo and Davis propose that high intelligence alone will not provide high levels of achievement, but may be necessary for achievement.
Inclusion is often talked about in the realm of special education and learning disabilities. Inclusion can be successful in these situations, sometimes, but more recently policy makers are putting gifted students into the discussion of inclusion. The same way the regular education students can help the special education students, it is believed that the gifted students can help the regular education students learn, and this will help them master the content as well. I believe this would be detrimental to the education of the “gifted” students. In my own experience, the opportunity to be a part of “gifted” classes has helped me to excel in school. If I had been unable to be put into the more fast pace and more difficult track at my high school, ...
...gh-functioning individuals in that domain. Further, giftedness can be viewed as developmental, in that in the beginning stages, potential is the key variable; in later stages, achievement is the measure of giftedness; and in fully developed talents, eminence is the basis on which this label is granted. Psychosocial variables play an essential role in the manifestation of giftedness at every developmental stage. Both cognitive and psychosocial variables are malleable and need to be deliberately cultivated (L. Coleman & Cross, 2005, Dai & Coleman, 2005a; Mayer, 2005; Olszewski-Kubilius, 2000).
I also chose this post because it enabled me to look deeper into this ongoing debate about the consensus of gifted education. Borland (2012) stated that, “intellectual ...
Perhaps we can recall the "smart kid" in our own class - the brain, the egghead, or the geek who was often ridiculed for getting good grades. Children like these often will try to make mistakes or get poor grades in an attempt to fit it with the rest of the children. But "fit in" is exactly what they cannot do. Gifted children are actually considered to be a deviant intelligence and it is practically impossible to find a gifted child who does not experience socialization problems (Campbell).
Mueller, C. M., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Praise for intelligence can undermine children’s motivation and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 33–52.
A child who grows up constantly being told that they are more intellectually capable than others their age is bound to develop an overconfident attitude. Knowing that they achieved this with minimal effort, they also will become lazy, living their lives carefree. At a time, I was recognized as the smartest student in Happy Valley Elementary School; I grasped concepts and completed work with practically zero effort for all subjects, and my writing ability exceeded those much older than I was. However, when hormones, bad teachers, and hours’ worth of homework quickly emerged in my later years, the confidence had disappeared, the lack of effort increased, and the title of “the smartest kid in school” was stolen from me.
Results of students who received praise for intelligence: The students in this category had negative results after receiving praising. When asked afterwards if they wanted to do the same level of problems or try more challenging ones, they chose the task that would allow them to look smart and do well on. Consequently, while telling a child how smart he or she is, we are sending a message to not take risks and just look the part. Afterwards, these children were given a hard task, which they performed poorly on, and they know longer liked the problems and did not want to practice them at home. Children also felt “dumb” and when given the initial task (in which they did well), they performed significantly worse. Lastly, their opinions of intelligence reflected that it was an innate capacity as though you cannot improve.
Adolescents. VanTassel-Baska, J.L., Cross, T. L. & Olenchak, F. R. (Eds.). Social-Emotional Curriculum With Gifted and Talented Students (pp. 133-151). Prufrock Press Inc. Waco, Texas.
Lovecky, D. V. (1995). Highly Gifted Children and Peer Relationships. Counseling and Guidance Newsletter. Retrieved March 10, 2003, from http://print.ditd.org/floater=74.html.