Gambling And Gambling

Gambling has been a part of human existence since Zeus, Hades and Poseidon first had the experience of taking chances and going against all odds. It is the oldest diversions in which many play by way of wagering properties, wealth, and at a point of time a way to predict harvest within a time of year. Chinese were among the first to take wagering to the next step by developing tiled games which was often played for entertainment, pleasure, and currency. In this case, “Ethical Egoism” would be a great illustration to implement its philosophy surrounded by ethical problems that are related by way of gambling. “Ethical Egoism” the literal meaning of “ego” comes from the Greek word for “self,” or “I,” and that notion is at the center of egoism: I do what I want to do in order to increase my own happiness and my own pleasure (Mosser, 2013).
To begin with, gambling would be defined as someone who plays a game of chance for money and takes uncertain actions in the hopefulness of an anticipated outcome. Winning or losing is decided habitually by chance especially gambling. The word habitually is well-defined by the nature of being an addict; fixed by or resulting from a habit. Although many believe that the cost outweighs its benefits, the theory of “Ethical Egoism” will truly expose the true distinctiveness on the problem of gambling.
In today’s society people often gamble simply because it is what they want in order to satisfy a sense of liberation, increase their gratification and purely for the reason that they can and nobody is to stop them. If you were to think of it the game of luck are games in which the results be contingent, either to some extent or entirely, on luck. Practice does not increase a person’s probabilities of winn...

... middle of paper ...

...one’s life especially if the individual’s money increases but the consequences will be overwhelming.
In conclusion both theory helps us reason that virtuous and ethical behavior are based on what develops relevance or unfairness from the effect of the act itself. The deeds of gambling causes undesirable effects which delineate happiness and smothers morality. The existence of moral absolute would be nonexistent given the fact that it does not fulfill good nor does it legitimately maximizes it. The cause and effect of gambling is overwhelming and should be eluded. It allows one to present certain identities which in most cases are created by participation. One manifestation of this approach is the argument that participation in some gambling activities is more likely to result in problem gambling than participation in other gambling activities (Holtgraves, 2009).