Fundamental Elements to Consider When Making Medical Decisions

3027 Words7 Pages

Short Essay
As a matter of ethics and the given law, there are controversial aspects outlining the fundamental elements an individual is to consider when making medical decisions. Following the Canadian legal system, adults who understand the consequences of their medical choice have the ability to decline any medical treatments they would like even if it has the ability to save their lives. That is the idea of an individual being a self-proprietor. The Canadian common law acknowledged that an individual has the right to control their body. Tort battery, being when unwanted physical interference takes place without his or her permission has constantly protected bodily security . Physicians frequently encounter the question on whether minors have these rights. There have been many deliberations surrounding the idea of whether children have he ability to consent or decline medical procedures over the objection or approval of the parent. The extent children have to make such decisions is varied from countries around the world with Canada being one of them.
Canadian law has reached the fundamentals outlining that the decision-making capacity in which an adolescent carries is not strictly associated to the age of the individual but more on the maturity that one possess. In 2009, a case took place, A.C. v. Manitoba, which revolved around a fourteen-year-old girl who was hospitalized with Crohn’s disease. She was a Jehovah’s Witness and had signed an advance medical directive stating not to receive any blood transfusions no matter the circumstances . Her condition was very serious and without the blood transfusion she would die. For that reason a judge granted an order for treatment so she was given the blood transfusion pursuant to th...

... middle of paper ...

...ems to be the most promising solution to promote the perseverance of common pool resources. The solution to the tragedy of the commons mentioned by Garret Hardin being the formation creating common pool resources as private property will not be as promising as the solution provided by Justice Douglas in creating common pool resources as legal persons. There are many concepts discussed that can be used to preserve and regulate nature such as property concepts along with the concepts of the legal person. It is fundamental to believe that nature tends to play a big role in individuals lives even though it may not seem that way. This conclusion is a result of the many cases revolving around this element. Although the solutions to preserve common pool resources have been discussed, it will always be a question as to who or what concept will become dominant in this area.

More about Fundamental Elements to Consider When Making Medical Decisions

Open Document