Frozen Film Analysis

671 Words2 Pages

Criticizing Movie’s at Its Finest

Movie critics are very based on what the viewers are watching, such as how good, or how bad the movie might be. Deconstruct being described as “also claim[ing] that language is incapable of representing any sort of reality directly” (Mays 1310) towards the audience like in “Halloween” Siskel and Ebert, “300” and “Frozen” by Honest Trailers the critics describe the basic acts of each movie so that the audience don’t take it the wrong way. In this case critics are using the fast approach of deconstructing, meaning it is not what it appears to be and it is just a different approach as to what the authors want you to believe in.

Siskel and Elbert critic Halloween and how the differently the audience takes the movie. In other words, the movie might be taken as either an offense to the audience or an entertainment. In the video Siskel and Elbert discuss that the “difference between a horror movie and a freak show” (Siskel and Elbert) might not even occur to the reader. The movie happens to come across many interpretations as how it can easily offend anyone who doesn’t think of this movie as an …show more content…

Screen Junkies have two Honest Trailers”300” and “Frozen” that have been hilariously broken down for the audience. In 300 the audience views the movie in a “blend of historical truth” (Screen Junkies), since the it has to do with Spartans. Screen Junkies is not only trying to make one laugh with their critics but it is also letting the reader know that the movie is based on many other things other than just Spartans. The language in the movie creates the reader to be “detecting gaps and contradictions” (Mays 1310) due to it not being completely honest. Many historical movies are not exactly based on what happened in the past but just a form of

Open Document