Throughout history, mankind has been fascinated by a place that has remained beyond our grasp. This place has been described in countless different religions, all having their differences, but sharing a common similarity in the form of life after death. Christianity makes it extremely clear in the bible that there exists a place called heaven that will only be granted to those that are righteous, fair and just. So, it comes to no surprise that faithful Christians seek to purse this goal or reward, but many struggle in remaining morally good with are God given freewill. What are our options? Well, the monastic life described in The Rule of Saint Benedict presents the reader with the idea of becoming a monk for a catholic monastery, to devout …show more content…
A quick example that I believe conveys the point between the two is the act of growing up. When we are in the toddler stage of life, we start to experiment with our environment and sometimes do bad things based on individual desires or needs. We get reprimanded by our parents or those watching us. A comment is usually made saying no, don’t do that and if your come from a religious household maybe a God doesn’t like that remark. Now, as toddlers we didn’t intrinsically know right from wrong. We had to be taught that from our parents, who were taught at some point during their lives. I imagine the toddler as a symbol of secular life with parents being a symbol of monastic life. Toddlers are told what not to do, but aren’t trained for different situations until they happen. Parents on the other hand represent the monastic life because they been trained to know right from wrong following their own learned life lessons. I’ve gotten a bit off track, so it’s time to bring the topic back to monks and …show more content…
The Abba is important to the monastic life of entrance into heaven because he acts as father with the monks as his children. This is further expressed as an importance as the abbot “should always remember that he will be held accountable on Judgement Day for his teaching and the obedience of his charges. The abbot must be led to understand that any lack of good in his monks will be held as his fault” Now, if someone is a truly bad seed they will eventually be asked to leave the monastery, however, this is a last resort. The abbot used excommunication as term of punishment for a monk failing to be devoutly good for God but also took care of both the excommunicated and the sick. With all this, the advantage of monastic lifestyle is very clear. Monks have a designated person that can watch over them and help guide them on the right path when disasters happen. Those from the secular path of life, once they are past a certain age, may not have a person to help guide them back after getting lost on the path to heaven. Even those that have said person might be given advice that hinders them rather than help them. With this in mind, the monastic life provides an abbot that cares for his “flock” with “diligence and cautious practical wisdom,” who’s willing to care for all his brothers in monastery as if their his own. This forms a beneficial
In the Middle Ages, lay brethren participated in the development of monasteries so monks could focus on their studies. The monastic tradition sprang from the idea that monks would act as "spiritual militia" to prevent people from sinning and give penances to those who fell into temptation. "Our Lady 's Tumbler" serves as a distinction for a lay person, as he is housed in a monastery and performs self-inflicted penances for his sins. While there are some insinuations for the lay community in this legend, it is meant mainly for a monastic audience in order to show that anyone can reach sainthood, if they live a life of devotion to God by overcoming sin through worship and penance.
...ore than communities occupied for monks and a stop for merchants, “monasteries [are now] engaged in banking or money-lending activities, and many others maintained schools that provided a basic education for local populations” (T.E. 295). With the favor of the people and in combination with Wu and her state’s endorsement, Buddhism and monasteries flourished and becomes an integral part of the Chinese culture by providing education and economic service to return the favor, thus strengthening the symbiotic role between government and religion. Monasteries’ “engage[ment] in banking [and] money-lending activities” is a sign that monasteries no longer just serve a monotonous purpose, but that it now plays an integrated role with the Chinese culture and economy as it is a pivotal point in gradual building the robust Chinese economy in the mutually benefitting relationship.
“He has finally learned to love big brother” was how George Orwell in his novel 1984 described Winston, conversion to the party are represented by big brother at the end of the novel. It is easy to believe that at this instance, after torturous reeducation that Winston has endured, he has lost free will and no longer be able to freely choose to love big brother but was forced to, against hiss will. Therefore Winston was never free to love big brother, and in fact not free at all after his “reeducation.” But if we are to accept a definition of free will that stipulates that we are able to produce and act on our own volitions we must accept that Winston has retained and has chosen to love big brother out of his own free will.
In his youth, St. Boniface encountered many priests or clerics who traveled from town to town. Through these spiritual conversations, it became evident to St. Boniface that he wanted to pursue a life with God. Eventually, after continuos begging and his fathers fatal sickness, he was sent to the care of the Monastery of Examchester. (Appleton) It is here, that St. Boniface expressed to the Abbot at the time, that he wanted to live a monastic life. The father of the monastery, after council, granted him his wish. Here is where the saint began to prove his love for God, and could begin his journey of the Christian life. After exceeding all expectations and surpassing the knowledge of his teachers, he moved to a neighboring monastery, called Nursling, whereby he studied under the influence of Abbot Winbert.(St. Boniface Church) Here he gained vast knowledge of scriptures and the spiritual exposition of the Bible. Here, he gained such a reputation that men and women from far and wide traveled to study scriptures under his guidance. At the age of 30 he was humbly ordained a priest and yet another branch of his life was fulfilled.
One of the biggest spiritual reforms was the development of monasteries. Before this time monasteries were a place for social revolutionaries and rejects, but St. Benedict set up a code of values for these monasteries that emphasized such values as prayer, poverty, obedience and chastity. Therefore, monasteries became an acceptable way to show devotion to God and the church.
While Nirvana is the ultimate spiritual attainment, most ordinary Buddhists show their commitment to the Buddha through several religious practices. The basic motives behind Buddhist practices mirror with those behind the Catholic tradition (Seay (2001,p.58). Both traditions aim to create togetherness within their community by developing a sense of communion with all present through a group activity. Some of these activities include group prayer/meditation and group singing/chanting. Another motive behind some Buddhist and Catholic practices is the principle of suffering, a significant element of religious tradition. This principle was formed on the basis of the suffering endured by Saddartha Gutama and Jesus Christ and is put into practice through traditions like achieving Nirvana and Le...
Hypothetically speaking, if there was a machine in the world that could able project the image of a person choosing to do tomorrow. Wouldn’t that entail tomorrow this person must do what was known in advance? In the end, despite the planning and deliberating, this person must choose exactly as the machine projected. The question we have to ask ourselves is this: “Does free will exist, or it just merely an illusion?” But, no machine with such capability existed in this world, and the only one with such power is God. The argument of God’s omniscient and human free will has gone for thousands of years, the core of this argument is if God was claimed to be all-knowing, hence in possession of infallible foreknowledge of human actions, therefore, humans should not have free will. The concept of God is all-knowing and human have free will is inherently contradictory, therefore, they cannot coexist. This argument implicated predestination and often resonated with the dilemma of determinism, because God was supposed to have given mankind free will.
Free-will, the ability one has to act without the constraint of necessity or fate. It the power a person has to act at one’s discretion. Do we really have the freedom to experience what we want, when we choose? Some would say yes while some others will say no, philosophers have argued about this topic and there hasn’t been any particular conclusion yet. It is the ability a person or animal has to choose his or her course of actions. Although most philosophers suppose that the concept of free-will is very closely connected to the concept of moral responsibility.
“Please tell me: isn’t God the cause of evil?” (Augustine, 1). With this question to Augustine of Hippo, Evodius begins a philosophical inquiry into nature of evil. Augustine, recently baptized by Saint Ambrose in Milan, began writing his treatise On Free Choice of the Will in 387 C.E. This work laid down the foundation for the Christian doctrine regarding the will’s role in sinning and salvation. In it, Augustine and his interlocutor investigate God’s existence and his role in creating evil. They attempt not only to understand what evil is, and the possibility of doing evil, but also to ascertain why God would let humans cause evil. Central to the premise of this entire dialogue is the concept of God, as relates to Christianity; what is God, and what traits separate Him from humans? According to Christianity, God is the creator of all things, and God is good; he is omnipotent, transcendent, all-knowing, and atemporal- not subject to change over time- a concept important to the understanding of the differences between this world and the higher, spiritual realm He presides over. God’s being is eidos, the essence which forms the basis of humans. With God defined, the core problem being investigated by Augustine and Evodius becomes clear. Augustine states the key issue that must be reconciled in his inquiry; “we believe that everything that exists comes from the one God, and yet we believe that God is not the cause of sins. What is troubling is that if you admit that sins come from… God, pretty soon you’ll be tracing those sins back to God” (Augustine, 3).
Free will and moral responsibility has always been one of the most basic and fundamental elements of philosophy. It is undeniable that there is a connection between free will and moral responsibility. Different philosophers throughout the ages have viewed this connection in both similar and differing ways. The first connection between free will and moral responsibility can be seen by Aristotle and Epictetus through their views of the voluntary and involuntary. It can then be seen in a differing view by Frankfurt in which a person is only free if they are free to have the will they want.
The life of a Buddhist monk involves a considerable amount of patience. One must go through an immense amount of training which requires a great amount of time to accomplish to become a Buddhist monk. One must also become familiar with the background behind Buddhism to fully understand the life of Buddhist monks. The restrictions on their daily life also allow us to visualize the life of Buddhist monks. A person seeking insight on Buddhist monks’ lives should learn about meditation in Buddhism to increase background knowledge. One can learn about the life of a Buddhist monk by learning about these aspects of Buddhist life.
The differences between the laity and monastic worshippers within Buddhist tradition are distinguished by the extent to which these two groups are willing to follow the middle-way as taught by Buddha. Typically, in order to have a functional Buddhist society, there must be the devout, and those who support the devout, giving aid in the form of food, monies, shelter, transportation, etc. The devout who sacrifice the purity of a true monastic lifestyle in order to support the community (who in turn are the recipients of merit or punya; a bank of ‘good’ actions tied to ‘good’ karma) (Gethin 101), from the monastic worshippers, are called the laity; upasakas (men laity) and upasikas (women laity). The monastics, or Bhikkhus (monks) and Bhikkhunis (nuns) are responsible for accepting the devotion shown by the laity, reciprocally, the laity are obliged to maintain devotion for “in order to be free from guilt […] the bases of a clear conscience [is] generosity and good conduct” (Ibid 83) . Good conduct is the realization and active partaking of the “eight significant dimensions [the Noble Eight-fold Path] of one’s behavior” (Ibid 82), which constitute right (in all actions of) understanding, thought, speech, action, livelihood, effort, mindfulness, and concentration (although not limited to, rather expanded upon realization). The importance of a laities duty within society is to support, through their livelihood, the only traditional Buddhist teaching available to them (Ibid 92). In order to adapt a Buddhist ideology, some conducts were left out of lay worship to support a less strenuous spiritual life (putting the emphasis on merit earned) in pursuit of maintaining a functional community. The purpose, to establish the five lay percepts ...
Many Christians today know very little if anything about Monasticism. Some probably have never heard of the term before. Monasticism also referred to as monarchism is the act of living alone. It is a religious practice where one fully devotes one’s life to those things that are wholly spiritual.
In the middle ages Friars, Monks and Prioresses had very specific roles in society. A Friar had to follow the mendicant order while living off of charity, preaching, educating, attending to the sick and absolving people from their sin. The Prioress was the head of a group of nuns. She would have had a low social standing as she belongs to the Theocracy. Her roles included growing vegetables and grain, producing wine and honey, providing medical care for the community and being in charge of the Priories. Lastly, the Monk’s role was to remain in his cloister and study religious texts; “And that a monk uncloistered is a mere/ Fish out of water, flapping on the pier…”(177-178). All of these people were supposed to model holiness; they were bound to the community and had no personal possessions. They are supposed to be selfless Christians dedicated to the Church.