Freedom of Contract Theory

1763 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Questions on the types of Contracts

RESEARCH QUESTION Tracing back the history of the freedom of contract theory, is the freedom to enter into contract(s) truly free? HYPOTHESIS With the codification of contract law, parameters have been set for people who can and who cannot enter into contracts i.e. all persons cannot be parties to contracts or enter into contractual relations. It has also been specified about the types of contract one can enter into. Hence, there are restrictions on persons. 1. INTRODUCTION In the beginning of the formation of state and the laws getting codified, the legal system as such did not recognize contracts as legal as legal entity or something in which the state will poke its nose into. They were not considered illegal, but private- between two parties in which the government will not concern itself with. This is where the concept of freedom of contract theory slowly emerged from. That meant that if one lost money or goods because the other party did not fulfil their side of the deal, there was no legal redress for such wrongs. The finite legal redress that was available was not because of the breach of contract but other factors, which used to range from an action of debt to trespass. But with the industrial revolution, laws relating to contracts slowly came into being into existence and started getting codified. The concept of Freedom of Contract is based primarily on the “will theory” of contract, which gave it a philosophical justification, along with the economic concept of laissez faire. It gives freedom to a reasonable individual to choose the person he wants to form contract with and create a legal relationship and also set the parameters of the said contract. The government neither plays any role in this nor was it expe... ... middle of paper ... ...by any state which would be aimed at regulating business practices. The most famous of such cases in Lochner v. New York, 48 US 45 (1905), in which the SC decided that laws trying to regulate labours and their working hours were unnecessary, unreasonable and prevented a person from entering into valid contracts. Thanuja Rodrigo, ‘Theoretical justifications for restraining “unconscionable” demands under on-demand guarantees’2012) 40 ABLR 5 accessed on 3rd February 2014 Id. J. Beatson, Anson’s Law of Contract, (28th edn, Oxford, 2008) 4 George Mitchell (Chesterhall) Ltd v Finney Lock Seeds Ltd, [1983] 2 AC 803 George Mitchell (Chesterhall) Ltd v Finney Lock Seeds Ltd, [1983] QB 284 Beatson, Id.[14], 5 Beatson, Id [14], 7

Show More
Related

  • Social Contract Theory: The Deserted Island

    254 Words  | 1 Pages

    “Social contract theory says that people live together in society in accordance with an agreement that establishes moral and political rules of behavior. Some people believe that if we live according to a social contract, we can live morally by our own choice and not because a divine being requires it.” - Crash Course. I think they provide a valuable framework for harmony in society. In this sitution is not good thing which third/ fourths of the people don’t understand english that it could be dangerous for the people who don’t speak chinse.

    Read More

  • Understanding Fairness in Contractual Agreements: A Rawlsian Perspective

    1178 Words  | 3 Pages

    Merriam-Webster Dictionary has a two-fold definition for the word “contract”. A contract is “a binding agreement between two or more persons or parties, especially one legally enforceable” (Merriam-Webster). It is also a business agreement for the supply of goods or services at a fixed price” (Merriam-Webster). John Rawls argues that “an agreement is not necessarily fair even if it is voluntary. To be fair, an agreement must also be made against a background of equality. It is unfair if one of the contracting parties is able to take advantage of the other party because they are stronger, richer, better informed, or simply more powerful” (Sandel 30). The purpose of this essay is to affirm Rawls’ argument because I do agree that entrance into a contract does not mean that the contract is just, especially if one party is perceived to have an advantage over the terms of the contract. To do so, I will use a scenario to prove that if an agreement was made voluntarily, this is not enough to ensure that the terms agreed to are fair. I will also provide possible counterarguments for oppositions that provide criticism on Rawls’ grounds.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Promissory Estoppel

    765 Words  | 2 Pages

    "A contract is a legally enforceable promise or set of promises. In other words, when promises have the status of contract, the contracting party harmed by a breach of the contract is entitled to obtain legal remedies against the breaching party" (Mallor et al., 2015, p. 320)

    Read More

  • John Rawls' Approach to Distributive Justice

    1244 Words  | 3 Pages

    A Theory of Justice is the magnum opus of 20th century social contract theorist and political philosopher, John Rawls. A bit of background into this work is that social contract theory had fallen out of favor with political scientists and philosophers since the last 18th century, with the success of the American Revolution and the apparent triumph of John Locke and Democracy. However, with the advent of modern globalization, the emergence of America as a superpower, but the growing concern of socio-economic disparity necessitated a revisiting of the social contract, what it means, how societies and governments were best constructed.

    Read More

  • State of Good Faith in English Contract Law

    2595 Words  | 6 Pages

    Having evaluated the current state of English contract law, mainly made up of piecemeal solutions, it can be seen that despite being satisfactory and doing its job, there still remain gaps within the law of contract where unfairness is not dealt with. Moreover, due to the ad hoc nature of those piecemeal solutions, the latter have often produced inconsistent justice and have manifested cases of unfairness. Hence, “a relatively small number of respected Justices have endeavored to draw attention to the fact that the application of a general principle might be useful and even necessary in English law.”

    Read More

  • Individual Freedom vs. Majority Rule

    1678 Words  | 4 Pages

    Freedom is one of the most central and certainly most emotive issues in political philosophy. It has been discussed since the times of ancient Greece, and is still as controversial and divisive a topic as ever. This question deals with two separate questions concerning freedom: Firstly, why we consider freedom necessary, and secondly, what exactly is meant by freedom. Clearly, the answer to the second part will greatly affect the answer to the first, but it shall be seen that it is a very challenging task to arrive at a definition of freedom. It is possible, however, to make this job easier by not strictly defining freedom, and using an examination into the desirability of freedom to help form this definition. This will be done below.

    Read More

  • Exclusion Clauses in Contracts

    1248 Words  | 3 Pages

    The exclusion clause is an important device for allocating the risks between the contractual parties. However, the exclusion clauses could mostly be found in written contracts, especially standard form of contracts. Standard form contracts with consumers are often contained in some printed ticket, or delivery note, or receipt, or similar document. In practice, it is very common that if a person wants the product, he may have no alternative but to accept the terms drawn up by the other party even though such terms are disadvantage to him, or he may simply accept it regardless the possible unfavorable position because he does not trouble to read a long list of terms and conditions. Therefore, contracts are regularly signed, tickets are simply accepted, or a tick-box on a website is clicked, commonly between large companies and individual consumers.

    Read More

  • Carill V Carbolic Smokeball Case Study

    1388 Words  | 3 Pages

    This judgment given set criterion which is still been used in the modern court system and due to this case it was developed that an offer of contract can be unilateral and doesn’t have to be made to a specific party only. Also it was developed to that the acceptance of an offer does not require a notification and that once the concerned party purchases the product the contract is active then and there itself. And it was also established that purchase of an item is a fine example of consideration and therefore makes it a valid contract. (Smith, 2000).

    Read More

  • Universal Declaration of Human Rights

    1354 Words  | 3 Pages

    Friend, Celeste. "Social Contract Theory [Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy]." Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Hamilton College, 15 Oct. 2004. Web. 01 Oct. 2011. .

    Read More

  • Essay On Formation Of A Contract

    709 Words  | 2 Pages

    The basic law of a contract is an agreement between two parties or more, to deliver a service or a product. And reach a consensus about the terms and conditions that is enforced by law and a contract can be only valid if it is lawful other than that there can’t be a contract. For a contract to exist the parties must have serious intentions, agreement, contractual capacity meaning a party must be able to carry a responsibility, lawful, possibility of performance and formalities. Any duress, false statements, undue influence or unconscionable dealings could make a contract unlawful and voidable.

    Read More

  • The Role of Consideration in the English Law of Contract

    2235 Words  | 5 Pages

    E.G. Lorenzen, Causa and Consideration in the Law of Contracts (1919). Faculty Scholarship Series. Paper 4560.

    Read More

  • Essay On Contract Law

    2266 Words  | 5 Pages

    A contract is an agreement between two parties in which one party agrees to perform some actions in return of some consideration. These promises are legally binding. The contract can be for exchange of goods, services, property and so on. A contract can be oral as well as written and also it can be part oral and part written but it is useful to have written contract otherwise issues can be created in future. But both the written as well as oral contract is legally enforceable. Also if there is a breach of contract, there are certain remedies for that which are discussed later in the assignment. There are certain elements which need to be present in a contract. These elements are discussed in the detail in the assignment. (Clarke,

    Read More

  • Essay On Social Contract Theory

    1268 Words  | 3 Pages

    From elementary to high school and even college students are compelled to attend school all around the world. In schools students not only learn general education but learn a lot about themselves. It is said that in the first twenty years of an individual’s life are the years that the individual finds out who they really are. An individual’s moral beliefs are one of the most personal and complex pieces of that individual. There are several great moral theories that could be taught in school, but to only choose one is very difficult. Some of the most known moral theories are Utilitarianism, Virtue Ethics, Kantianism and even Social Contract Theory. All of these theories were developed by some of the most incredible philosophers of all time.

    Read More

  • Case Study Of Offer And Acceptance In Modern Contract Law

    894 Words  | 2 Pages

    One of the last remaining strongholds of classical contract law is the notion that contracts require offer and acceptance therefore, in order for a contract to become binding, offer, acceptance, consideration and intention to create legal relations must exist. However contracts are formed in different ways for each different circumstance. (Shawn Bayern, Offer and Acceptance in Modern Contract Law: A Needles Concept, 103 Cal. L. Rev. 67, 102 (2015)

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Liberalism And Fascism

    1865 Words  | 4 Pages

    Before freedom in liberalism and fascism can be discussed, freedom must be first clarified. John Stuart Mill (1859) and Isaiah Berlin (1958) classified two sorts of freedom; negative freedom and positive freedom. Berlin

    Read More

More about Freedom of Contract Theory

Open Document