Free Trade: America Should NOT Protect Industries from Foreign Competition

800 Words2 Pages

Free Trade: America Should NOT Protect Industries from Foreign Competition

Many politicians oppose free international trade, trade without any restrictions, for a couple of reasons. From their point of view it would affect the United States in several ways:

1. Many USA workers would lose their jobs because factories would be moved to the

country with whom the U.S. has a Free Trade Agreement, and where working force

is much cheaper.

2. Importing foreign goods and services without tariff into the United States makes

it harder for domestic industries to compete with lower prices and better

quality of foreign competition.

3. Some politicians feel that it is not the right decision to have open trade with

countries where the workforce is forced to work and where prisoners are used as

workers.

Because of these reasons, politicians who oppose Free Trade, feel that the U.S. should have some kind of restrictions, such as protective tariffs, import quotas, non tariff barriers, and/or export subsidies. However, some politicians and economists feel differently. They say that if some country would raise its barriers in order to reduce imports and stimulate production, the country whose exports suffer may raise its barriers, too. This would cause a trade war. The trade war would effect every nation in lower output, income, and employment; example is the Smooth-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930.

The United St...

Open Document