Free Speech: Two Sides Of Freedom Of Speech

FREEDOM OF SPEECH

The introduction:

Humans are born free, and they are unique by having minds. Accordingly, every day, they gain new knowledge, and day by day they become smarter. They become more thinker, become more understanding things. Therefore, they have the right to speech without any restrictions. “Freedom is the right to tell people what they do not want to hear,” Orwell. There are various methods that the humans used in the past to express their thoughts. They used primitive lines, and inscriptions on the walls of caves, drawing, animals, tools and sophistication, to syllables and letters in the formation of languages. Freedom of speech means the way that people express their ideas, thoughts by writing or speaking, or even

Freedom of speech has two sides. The first side is personal, and the other is social. The personal side makes the individual complete his character by self-expression. However, the social side is about the individual respect other individual’s religion. This freedom is considered one of the basic pillars of the democratic system. Has expressed that the Supreme Constitutional Court in saying that freedom of expression is reported to be an impact in the field of public affairs liaison, display conditions, and that the Constitution wanted to ensure freedom of expression to be dominated concepts on aspects of life in the depths of origins. Freedom of religious institutions (of the mosque and the church) within the community in the exercise, and the freedom to manifest one 's religion or belief and worship, observance, practice in community with others and in public (Article 18.1 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights). However, the social dimension in both freedom of expression and freedom of religious belief raises a problem concerning the scope of the exercise of freedom of expression with regard to the possibility that roll into this practice in a violation of religious freedom and spoke out. The highly sensitive relationship between freedoms have originated when the views of hostile or critical of religion in some other expressions made under the guise of

This confrontation has dropped between the freedoms of responsibility of the law to find solutions to them. That raised three problems, and the first look problematic in the event of conflict