Frankenstein Over Time In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein Over Time

886 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: issues in frankenstein novel mary shelley

Frankenstein Over Time
Mary Shelley’s novel Frankenstein is impressive, entertaining, and fascinating so is it no surprise there have been so many films and artworks influenced by her novel. Many of which have put their own spin to the horror novel, especially the character of the creature that remains one of the most recognized icons in horror fiction. However, there have been critics whom argue modern versions and variations have lost the horror and passion that is an essential to the creature. The start of the Creature is bound to one book. However, public impression of the Creature has changed severely since the publication of the original novel, leading to diverse styles and plot lines in its diverse film adaptations. People’s impression of the Creature have become so twisted and turned by time and decades of false film posters and article titles that most use the name “Frankenstein” to refer to the Creature itself, rather than the scientist who created him! It’s a shame! An understanding of literary history is a necessity to comprehend the truth of the Creature’s tragic history and how decades of film adaptations changed him into the hulking beast most people know him as today.

Illustration from the frontispiece of the 1831 edition of Shelley’s Frankenstein novel by Theodor von Holst
First of all, Mary Shelley describes the Creature with "yellow skin scarcely covered the work of muscles and arteries beneath; his hair was luxurious black, and flowing; his teeth of pearly whiteness; but these luxuriances only formed a more horrid contrast with hid watery eyes, that seemed almost of the same colour as the dun-white sockets in which they were set, his shrivelled complexion and straight black lips." Despite his appearance o...

... middle of paper ...

..."She was there, lifeless and inanimate, thrown across the bed, her head hanging down, and her pale and distorted features half covered by her hair. Everywhere I turn I see the same figure--her bloodless arms and relaxed form flung by the murderer on its bridal bier" (Shelley). However in the image a goblin like creature sits upon Elizabeth's chest and a horse stands in the background.
In, Susan Tyler Hitchcock book "Frankenstein: A Cultural History", she writes that it is inevitable that inspired films or artworks will create myths that stray from the original source to keep the story fresh and interesting. Frankenstein like any other tale, myth or legend, has been passed down from generation from generation. And from every retelling or remaking of the story parts have been changed or forgotten. And the only way to know the truth is to find the original source.

Show More
Related

  • Diction In Frankenstein

    649 Words  | 2 Pages

    Many authors have different ways of building characters and how they look. It is up to the reader to build their perspective from the descriptions given by the author in order to understand books. Mary Shelley, the author of Frankenstein, sculpts the readers’ perspective of her monster through powerful diction and emotional syntax. After Dr. Frankenstein finally accomplishes his goal of re-animating a lifeless human, Shelley uses her strong word choice to fully express the extent of horror that Frankenstein had felt, describing his monster as a “demonical corpse to which I had so miserably given life.” (Shelley 45). Frankenstein’s horror is shared with the reader simply from a well descripted sentence. The detail Shelley put into Victor Frankenstein’s perspective is gradually shaping our own, as the reader’s, perspective. Furthermore, the diction being used adds a more definitive appearance to the monster. It helps us imagine what the monster looks like and additionally, how Frankenstein feels about his success.

    Read More

  • Something for Everybody: Brooks’ Reasoning for Monsterism in Frankenstein

    1281 Words  | 3 Pages

    Like all works that have been taught in English classes, Frankenstein has been explicated and analyzed by students and teachers alike for much of the twentieth and all of the twenty-first century. Academia is correct for doing so because Frankenstein can appeal to the interests of students. Students, teachers and experts in the areas of medicine, psychology, and sociology can relevantly analyze Frankenstein in their respective fields. However, Peter Brooks explains in “Godlike Science/Unhallowed Arts: Language and Monstrosity in Frankenstein” that Shelly had presented the problem of “Monsterism” through her language. According to Brooks, Monsterism is explicitly and implicitly addressed in Shelly’s language. While this may be correct, Brooks does it in such a way that requires vast knowledge of subjects that many readers may not be knowledgeable in. After summarizing and analyzing the positive and negative qualities of Brooks’ work, I will explain how the connection of many different fields of study in literature creates a better work.

    Read More

  • The Noble Savage in Frankenstein by Mary Shelley

    1233 Words  | 3 Pages

    The estimate of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein familiar to us from literary handbooks and popular impression emphasizes its macabre and pseudo-scientific sensationalism: properly enough, so far as either its primary conception or realized qualities are concerned. But it has the effect of obscuring from notice certain secondary aspects of the work which did, after all, figure in its history and weigh with its contemporary audience, and which must, therefore, be taken into consideration before either the book or the young mind that composed it has been properly assayed. One such minor strain, not too well recognised in criticism, is a thin vein of social speculation: a stereotyped, irrelevant, and apparently automatic repetition of the lessons of that school of liberal thought which was then termed philosophical.

    Read More

  • Who Is the Real Monster in Frankenstein?

    1708 Words  | 4 Pages

    Throughout the novel, Shelley investigates the idea of monstrosity. She makes the point that a monster does not have to be genuinely evil in order to be considered monstrous. Shelley presents two characteristics of mankind in order to prove her case. The first example is Frankenstein’s creation. Upon first being introduced to his creation, the reader initially labels him as a monster because of his physical appearance. He is portrayed as a man with “…yellow skin scarcely cover[ing] the work of muscles and arteries beneath…watery eyes, that seemed almost of the same colour as the dun-white sockets in which they were set…shrivelled complexion and straight black lips” (Shelley 58). Not only does the reader view him as...

    Read More

  • Physical Appearance in Mary Shelly's Frankenstein

    1265 Words  | 3 Pages

    “How can I describe my emotions at this catastrophe, or how delineate the wretch whom with such infinite pains and care I had endeavored to form? His limbs were in proportion, and I had selected his features as beautiful. Beautiful! – Great God! His yellow skin scarcely covered the work of muscles and arteries beneath; his hair was of a lustrous black, and flowing; his teeth of a pearly whiteness; but these luxuriances only formed a more horrid contrast with his watery eyes, that seemed almost of the same colour as the dun white sockets in which they were set, his shriveled complexion, and straight black lips.” (Shelley 34)

    Read More

  • What Is A Monster?

    1098 Words  | 3 Pages

    Peter Brooks' essay "What Is a Monster" tackles many complex ideas within Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, and the main concept that is the title of the essay itself. What is the definition of a monster, or to be monstrous? Is a monster the classic representation we know, green skin, neck bolts, grunting and groaning? A cartoon wishing to deliver sugary cereal? or someone we dislike so greatly their qualities invade our language and affect our interpretation of their image and physical being? Brooks' essay approaches this question by using Shelley's narrative structure to examine how language, not nature, is mainly accountable for creating the idea of the monstrous body.

    Read More

  • Essay on the Influence of Mary Shelley’s Life on Frankenstein

    922 Words  | 2 Pages

    Since its publication in 1818, Mary Shelley's Frankenstein has grown to become a name associated with horror and science fiction. To fully understand the importance and origin of this novel, we must look at both the tragedies of Mary Shelley's background and her own origins. Only then can we begin to examine what the icon "Frankenstein" has become in today's society.

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Frankenstein And Theodore Von Holst

    1368 Words  | 3 Pages

    Mary Shelley's novel Frankenstein was in need of illustration for its new edition and Theodore Von Holst was a qualified candidate for the job (“Image of the Month: Theodore Von Holst, 'Frankenstein'”). The artist decided to draw an important scene from the novel, which is the awakening of Frankenstein’s creation. This depiction is of true importance as this moment was when everything changed for the creator and it was a crucial moment that determined the creature’s fate, whether Frankenstein wanted to care for it or not. The creature, who lacks a given name, is of human physique and if one had not read the book, they would be completely unaware that he was a creation and not born of human parents. Holst’s drawing evidently portrays the fear

    Read More

  • The Clever Use of Diction in Mary Shelly's Frankenstein

    412 Words  | 1 Pages

    Frankenstein is the story of an eccentric scientist whose masterful creation, a monster composed of sown together appendages of dead bodies, escapes and is now loose in the country. In Frankenstein, Mary Shelly’s diction enhances fear-provoking imagery in order to induce apprehension and suspense on the reader. Throughout this horrifying account, the reader is almost ‘told’ how to feel – generally a feeling of uneasiness or fright. The author’s diction makes the images throughout the story more vivid and dramatic, so dramatic that it can almost make you shudder.

    Read More

  • How Frankenstein by Mary Shelley Has Influenced Pop Culture

    1116 Words  | 3 Pages

    Many timeless novels have impacts on our everyday culture, not only as a book, but also through music or movies. Many popular novels have multiple adaptations, which shape how we approach their interpretation, in ways we may never even notice. In some films, humans are depicted as monsters, whether through their actions, or through the thoughts of other beings. In these films we find issues with our own society, and in turn see ourselves as monsters, and look for ways we can change, for the better. One particular novel that influences this side of Hollywood is Mary Shelley's “Frankenstein”. The ways Frankenstein influences pop culture can be seen in science fiction films in which humans are depicted as monster, and “monsters” are seen as more humane beings, such as I, Robot, and Ender’s Game.

    Read More

  • Comparing Frankenstein And Myth In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

    356 Words  | 1 Pages

    Although alike, there is variance between the novel and the myth. Frankenstein is foolish in perceiving the outcome of his work. He arguably crosses a line in morality by taking dead body parts in establishing a giant new being, fashioning a thing he calls a ‘wretch’. He regrets ever conceiving the monster until the day he dies when he passes on the need to extinguish the thing from the world to Walton. His lack of care for the monster is also apparent in the absence of a name for him. The scientist neglects

    Read More

  • Comparison Between The Film And The Book Frankenstein

    746 Words  | 2 Pages

    Baldick, Chris. In Frankenstein's Shadow: Myth, Monstrosity, and Nineteenth-Century Writing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990. Print.

    Read More

  • Comparing Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein and Kenneth Branagh's Frankenstein

    1196 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...iro portrayal of Frankenstein’s monster has created a false myth of an evil, unintelligent monster that is not at all similar to the one Shelley displays in her novel. Not only does the movie spread a false interpretation of Shelley’s work, it provides the public with no lasting message about technology or about the effects of misplaced human love. Shall we then seek revenge? Shall we destroy that what is evil? Of course not--Shelley gave us all to learn a lesson of tolerance and of correcting our mistakes. Perhaps if a more accurate film version of Frankenstein were available to the public, more people would be motivated to read the book and learn Shelley’s powerful message.

    Read More

  • Feminism in Frankenstein

    1757 Words  | 4 Pages

    Over the years, the monster in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein has become universally portrayed in one way: a tall, green-skinned, dumb brute with no language or reasoning abilities. Society has turned the story of Frankenstein into a mere horror story, dehumanizing the monster more than was intended in Shelley’s novel. However, the message of Frankenstein is a far cry from the freak show displayed by the media. While many people may only see Frankenstein as a grotesque story meant to thrill its audience, its purpose goes much deeper as it advocates for the equal rights of women in society.

    Read More

  • A Monstrosity in Frankenstein by Mary Shelley

    808 Words  | 2 Pages

    “His yellow skin scarcely covered the work of muscles and arteries beneath; his hair was of a lustrous black, and flowing; his teeth of a pearly whiteness; but these luxuriances only formed a more horrid contrast with his watery eyes, that seemed almost of the same color as the dun-white sockets in which they were set, his shriveled complexion and straight black lips,” would be classified as a monster.

    Read More

More about Frankenstein Over Time In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein Over Time

Open Document