Essay On Formal Communication

858 Words2 Pages

Formal communications are those that flow within the chain of command or task responsibility defined by the organization.. (Daft, 2012, p.577). The three formal channels and types of information conveyed is downward, upward, and horizontal communications in an organization. Downward communication takes place during speeches, videos and blogs such as those posted on YouTube, and Kroger’s intranet. Upward communication is just that, messages that flow from the lower to the higher levels of the organization’s hierarchy. For example, suggestions for improvement to increase quality or efficiency, performance reports that inform managers on how individuals and departments are performing, and grievances, disputes and financial information (Daft, …show more content…

This can take place within or across departments. Horizontal communication informs and can also request support and coordinate activities. The three categories are intradepartmental problem solving, coordination and change initiatives and improvements. Personal communication channels that exist outside of the formal channels can take place informally, such as when managers get out of their offices and mingle with employees. Another informal, person-to-person communication network that is not sanctioned by the organization is gossip that typically travels along the grapevine. The grapevine will always exist and can become a dominant force when formal channels are …show more content…

Kroger’s management identified a permanent and great team which consisted of important key characteristics such as the teams type, structure, and composition. The team diversity in terms of task-related knowledge and skills can have a tremendous impact on team processes and effectiveness. Additionally, diversity in terms of gender and race can even affect a team’s performance along with the team size and roles. Clearly, Kroger’s sustainability team had an effective and strong team leader who led the way to such documented success as reflected in the quality of work, significant cost reductions, and innovations. Team leaders contributed to team success by rallying people around a compelling purpose, sharing control to spur commitment and motivation, clarify norms and expectations, and by admitting ignorance or asking for help when they need help (Daft, 2012,

Open Document