Wiard, Seth. "Application of Ballistics in Legal Cases." American Journal of Police Science. Volume 2. (1931): 174-178.
(2012). The influence of forensic evidence on the case outcomes of assault and robbery incidents. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 186-210. Brown, K. M., & Keppel, R. D. (2012). Child abduction murder: the impact of forensic evidence on solvability.
Explaining Criminals and Crime. Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury. Agnew, Robert 1992. "Foundation for a General Strain Theory of Crime and Delinquency" in Criminology 30(1): 47-87. Burton, Velmer S. and Francis T. Cullen.
Sympathy for the Devil: An Exploration of Federal Judicial Discretion in the Processing of White-Collar Offenders. American Journal of Criminal Justice : AJCJ, 37(1), 4-18. Retrieved April 19, 2012, from ProQuest Criminal Justice. (Document ID: 2586601701). Podgor, E.. (2007).
Inbau, F. (1999). Firearms identification--Ballistics. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 89(4), 1293-1314. Retrieved October 16, 2011, from Research Library. (Document ID: 51287719).
Value of DNA Evidence in Detecting Crime. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 52(1), 128-136. Moston, S., & Engelberg, T. (2011). The Effects of Evidence on the Outcome of Interviews with Criminal Suspects. Police Practice & Research, 12(6), 518 - 526.
Print. Tittle, Charles R., David A. Ward, and Harold G. Grasmick. "Self-Control and Crime/Deviance: Cognitive vs. Behavioral Measures." Journal of Quantitative Criminology 19.4 (2003): 333-65.
Although, forensic science comes at great assistance to law enforcement it has become an issue within recent years because of a constant clash between the legal system and forensic sciences. The purpose of this paper is to examine how the needs of law enforcement conflict with the ability and advances made in Forensic Science. This will be implemented by discussing particular advancements, including the ideal of “new forensics”, the various methodologies used and there critiques in regards to the Daubert and Frye Rulings (Meaney, 1994). Lastly, this paper will analyze the varying viewpoints of scholars regarding this issue and the various ways they believe this issue could be resolved. As stated previously, both the law and forensic science are used to solve crime but each area has a dissimilar way of solving crimes although they mutually rely upon one another (Metzgar, 2012).
“The Effect of Sanctions on Police Misconduct.” Crime & Delinquency 60(8):1258–88. Klockars, Carl B., Sanja Kutnjak Ivkovich, William E. Harver, and Maria R. Haberfield. n.d. “The Measurement of Police Integrity.” National Institute of Justice Research in Brief 1–11. Martin, Rich M. S. 2017. “Police Corruption: An Analytical Look into Police Ethics.” FBI.
Computer Forensics Characteristics and Preservation of Digital Evidence. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 73(3), 28-32. Volonino, L., Anzaldua, R., & Godwin, J. (2007). Computer forensics: Principles and practices.