Forensic psychology represents the meeting point connecting psychology and the criminal justice system. Forensic psychology encompasses comprehending justice legislation in the applicable jurisdictions in order to be able to appropriately interrelate with judges, attorneys and other criminal justice professionals. An essential characteristic of forensic psychology is the capability to make statements under oath in court as an expert consultant and witness. This is performed by reformulating psychological conclusions into the legal idioms of the courtroom and providing data to criminal justice professionals in a way that can be comprehended. In order to be a reliable expert witness, the forensic psychologist is required to have a comprehensive …show more content…
Forensic psychology has been formally recognized by the American Psychological Association, APA. Psychology is defined as the science of mental behavior and mental process. Forensic is defined by the performance of different scientific procedures and measurements that develop into the discovery of a criminal offense. Forensic psychology can be ultimately defined as the implementation of psychology in accessing mental processes and behavior processes with.in the application to several justice systems when combined together. The forensic psychologist required to possess a plethora of knowledge equally in the criminal justice, law and psychology in order to appraise and development an expert opinion established on evidence, evaluations, and assessments. Several historical benchmarks in the forensic psychology field have occurred over the last century. A prime example of this benchmark is the case United States vs. Driver in 1921. This case was the first time an American psychologist gave expert testimony as an expert witness in a court …show more content…
The clinical psychologist also provided expert testimony during the court proceedings regarding the plaintiff’s medical condition. During testimony, the clinical psychologist stated that the plaintiff qualified to receive the disability benefits. When this point was made, the defense objected. The judge subsequently informed the jury to discount the complete testimony of the clinical psychologist. This was on the basis that the clinical psychologist was stating his opinion. Soon after the initial decision; a court of appeals held that the clinical psychologist’s testimony should have been admitted during the court trial. The court of appeals also held that the psychologist was an expert
...merican Psychological Association. The APA submits an arguments that an accurate proceeding requires an adversary hearing, the assistance of mental health professionals, and decision makers to specify in writing the factors relied upon making decision.
The reason being, the Supreme Court found that the expert evidence was not only useful, but was required to have a more in-depth understanding of the issues surrounding battered women. The rationale was, without expert testimony most people would be ignorant to spousal abuse. It was thought that without expert testimony, jurors would make assumptions about the stereotypes that may have been popularized by society as well ignore the importance of previous events that led up to the incident. Moreover, the trial judge charged the jurors properly, explaining that as long as there is some admissible evidence to establish the foundation for the expert 's opinion, he cannot subsequently instruct the jury to completely ignore the testimony. The judge also warned the jury that the more the expert relies on facts, not proven in evidence the less weight the jury may attribute to the opinion. Furthermore, expert evidence does not and cannot usurp the jury 's function of deciding whether, in fact, the accused 's perceptions and actions were reasonable. But fairness and the integrity of the trial process demand that the jury have the opportunity to hear that
Kassin, Saul, and Lawrence Wrightsman (Eds.). The Psychology of Evidence and Trial Procedure. Chapter 3. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1985. Print.
There are certain standards that the courts use to determine competency. In order to find the accused competent, a court should find out by a preponderance of evidence that the defendant has remarkable ability to consult with his lawyer with a reasonable degree of rational indulgence. The def...
Roesch, R., Zapf, P. A., & Hart, S. D. (2010). Forensic psychology and law. Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons.
Defense experts are required to help the defense attorneys defend and breakdown all of the doubts in the prosecutors scientific findings in criminal cases. Scientific information is integral to a criminal prosecution, and a defense attorney needs to have an expert to assist he/she in discrediting the prosecution (Giannelli, 2011).
Applied scientists apply knowledge to solve practical problems of the modern world rather than acquire knowledge for knowledge sake. Basic scientists pursue knowledge motivated by scientific curiosity or interest in a scientific question and study a phenomenon to expand understanding in order to contribute to scientific advances in the area, not to solve a problem. The role of the policy evaluator is one in which psychologists who have methodological skills in assessing how well a policy has worked provide data regarding the effects of that policy. A forensic evaluator is responsible for providing forensic mental health assessments and expert court testimony on a variety of topics related to legal questions involving mental and emotional disorders, intellectual functioning, substance abuse, and other clinical disorders, as well as capacities that are directly related to the legal question. The role of ...
McGrath, Michael G. "Criminal Profiling: Is There a Role for the Forensic Psychiatrist?." Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 28. (2000): 315-324. Web. 13 Apr 2011.
Evidence collection is a crucial part of forensics. Its reliability can be compromised by input bias from law
Forensic psychiatry is a branch of psychiatry in the medical field which targets the interface of law and mental health of assessing and treating the mentally ill within a community. The field requires a deep understanding of the mentally incompetent and the legal outcomes of various situations. A forensic psychiatrist is a medical professional with a doctorate who has specialized in psychiatry and has a deep understanding of law and its processes. Their job is to assess, identify, and treat a person that has a mental illness which commonly involves legal situations. A forensic psychiatrist day-to-day life would include working with inmates in prison or a correctional institute, and or in a medical setting such as a hospital in which they will
Greenfield, D. (2007). Introduction to forensic psychology. issues and controversies in crime and justice. Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 35(2), 201-201-204,105-106.
Police psychology is broadly defined as the application of psychological principles and methods to law enforcement. With the popularity of television shows like Criminal Minds and Law & Order: SVU, the job of a police psychologist has become more well known and even popular. As seen on these shows, a police psychologist can be helpful in profiling a criminal, but they also provide many other services to the members of a police department. Although the development of this field has a long history, police psychology as a separate entity is still relatively recent and growing. This intimate relationship between psychology and law enforcement can be traced back to almost a century ago.[1] It first developed out of a need for a variety of psychological services in the law enforcement field, including screening applicants and counseling during grief and stress situations. In the time that it has been around, it has proved to be a valuable resource for the law enforcement profession.
When a person typically thinks of a psychologist, they think of a person who gives aid or counseling. However, a forensic psychologist is a person who is works with custody, insurance claims and lawsuits and does psychotherapy, and child custody investigations (Cherry, 2014). Nevertheless, these tasks cannot be completed without the proper credentials and degrees. With these degrees, the person must be able to work with a team in order to get work done and also be able to work wit...
Gary B. Melton, John Petrila, Norman G. Poythress, Psychological Evaluations for the Court: A Handbook for Mental Health Professionals and Lawyers, Guilford Publications, 3rd edition 2007
“The word ‘forensics’ means “connected with the courtroom”; so forensic science is, therefore, concerned with gathering hard evidence that can be presented in a trial” (Innes 9). Forensic science is a science that is applied specifically to legal matters, whether criminal or civil. “Few areas in the realm of science are as widespread and important as forensic science” (Hunter 12). Forensics is the one science that is most commonly used in everyday life. It is also a branch of science that incorporates other branches of science such as biology, chemistry, and etc. Since it is used almost every day “No one can dispute the importance of the contributions to society made by forensic science; the ability to solve crime is undeniably important” (Hunter 13). Forensic science has given criminal investigation a new edge. “Advances in science have opened the door for more effective evidence discovery, howev...