Foreign aid is financial help given by a country to another for purposes of economic stabilization, poverty and living standard. This essay will elaborate an issue that it is necessary to spend money on foreign aid. There are three premises supporting the main conclusion, the first reason is that aid saves lives, while the premises that aid improves education and aid reduces poverty rate both can be objected and rebuttal are also given. Furthermore, there are also two objection given which can be rebutted.
United States aid hurts Third World countries because we blanket them in security and their economic problems remain hidden. Their failing economic system will not collapse as long as we keep feeding them money. The point of foreign aid is to help the country "get back on its feet", and they never will if they never fix their broken economic system. The country can sit and ignore the underlying problems because they no longer have to worry about the screwed up system they have, as long as the United States keeps pumping the money ...
The United States continues to give around $550 billion in aid to other countries each year, making America the world's top donor by far (Richardson). While the United States government only supplies $252 billion to needy Americans each year. Former Assistant to the President for Communications, Patrick Buchanan said, "The idea that we should send endless streams of tax dollars all over the world, while our own country sinks slowly in an ocean of debt is, well, ludicrous" (Foreign Aid). The United States need to give money to support the domestic impoverished rather than supporting developing foreign countries because the poverty and homelessness in America is increasing faster than the aid necessary to reduce this trend. Part of the reason that the United States should aid the domestic impoverished is that some foreign countries cannot be trusted with the money given to them and in certain cases, the money intended to aid countries are harmful for that country’s well-being.
Aid is generally given by individuals, private organizations, or governments. Surprisingly, foreign aid from America is usually donated by organizations that are not tied to the government. A specific transfer that fits in...
The question at hand is not whether aid from the developed north should be given at all, but whether or not it should be increased to help ease the suffering of the developing countries in the south. Every country, whether rich or poor, should have compassion for the suffering. However, it is not the duty of the developed north to completely take care of every developing country. In the present, there are serious problems that need to be addressed dealing with how aid is given out: misuse of funds by governments, the corruption it creates, economies it destroys, lack of votes it buys at the United Nations, and finally the question of who has priority. Therefore, until these issues are dealt with in the near future, aid should be kept to a minimum.
Richardson, Clare. "U.S. Foreign Aid By Country." The Huffington Post. TheHuffingtonPost.com, 30 Aug. 2012. Web. 10 Feb. 2014.
The United States has proven again and again that foreign aid can be a worthwhile venture. While donating less than one half of one percent of the federal budget towards economic and humanitarian assistance, the United States has been able to establish trading markets for the present as well as the future. Between 1990 and 1993 alone, U.S. exports to developing nations increased by $46 billion ("Ten Questions Commonly Asked About U.S. Foreign Assistance Programs"). This dramatic change would not have happened if it were not for foreign assistance programs. Trade opportunities do not simply materialize, the groundwork must first be put in place. Through business code reforms, the strengthening of commercial banks, and the setting of reasonable tax and tariff standards, USAID helps to create an environment that will attract American investment and trade. Take for instance, the example of South Korea. During the 1960s and 70s, South Korea was one of the United States' prime targets for foreign assistance. The U.S. now exports more to South Korea in one year than was donated during both the 1960s and 70s. Because of this, the two have become extremely close allies, and are now two of the best trading partners in the world ("Ten Questions Commonly Asked About U.S. Foreign Assistance Programs").
A family is sitting around their dining room table. They are eating a meal and having quality time together, but little did they know, a terrorist group was about to bomb their neighborhood and change their lives forever. For situations like this, America, as well as other countries, have typically sent foreign aid to try to help the families and countries that are in those terrible situations. Some people, however, are beginning to think that America helping other countries is a bad idea. Even though there are flaws within America, getting involved with other countries is vital to the future because people around the world count on the US to enforce international humanitarian laws, it is beneficial to their military, and democracy is the optimal
Many people will argue that the United States military is always coming to the aid of other countries and maybe they should just mind their own business. It is a lot of small countries in the world that is unable to protect themselves and without the help of a power country the weaker country will be taken advantage of. The United States military is known for providing assistants to other countries that is in need from helping keep the peace to combat. According to Anup(2010), Military aid in recent years has increased, mostly in line with the “War on Terror” in Iraq and Afghanistan. A few years ago, the US invested more in getting Iraq and Afghanistan forces trained and increased military aid accordingly, hence the sharp rise (Anup, 2010).
The great American Civil War Veteran and Lawyer, Robert Ingersoll, once said, ¨We rise by lifting others.” . I think what Mr. Ingersoll was trying to say by this statement is that sometimes people just need a little extra push in life to be great. For years now the American people has been questioning would it just be easier to become an isolated country and focus on our own country, or is it our obligation to continue to help others in other countries. On a personal level I do believe that America should continue aiding other countries, all because of the old saying of “you scratch my back, I’ll scratch yours”. In other words helping others can lead to help for you weather it be during crucial wartime or during life's worse curveballs. With continuing foreign aid I also believe America should have some sort of restrictions on foreign aid.