Flip Flop Case Study

1346 Words3 Pages

Saeeid Tahmasbi Oskuii [et al.[1]] titled “Comparative study on low-power high-performance flip-flops” - factors to evaluate the overall performance of the flip flop viz., High speed, low power consumption, robustness and noise stability, small area and less number of transistors, supply voltage scalability, low glitch probability, large internal race immunity, insensitivity to clock edge, insensitivity to process variables, less internal activity when data activity is low.Latches and flip flops and the salient difference in their working is explained. Terms such as propagation delay, setup and hold time and their significance are explained. Differences between static and dynamic flip flops are explained. Effects of Charge sharing as the most common cause of dynamic flip flop failure is explained. Similarly the single edge and double edge triggered flip flops are touched upon as already discussed in (et al. [3]).Single ended flip-flop and differential flip flops are mentioned. The performance …show more content…

To improve the energy efficiency and performance a push-pull D flip flop and push pull isolation D flip flop are suggested. Among the five DFF’s compared, the push–pull isolation circuit is found to be the fastest with the best energy efficiency. To improve performance of a conventional DFF, an inverter and transmission gate are added between outputs of master and slave latches to accomplish a push–pull effect at the slave latch, i.e., between the input and output nodes of the output inverter which will be driven to opposite logic values during switching. This adds four MOSFET’s, but reduces the clock-to-output delay from 2 gates in a conventional D flip flop to one gate. To optimize the push–pull D flip flop for energy usage, two p-MOSFETS are then added to isolate the feedback

Open Document