The American educational system is constantly ridiculed for its universal expectations of students, despite their predetermined dispositions. As the world is progressing, America’s educational system is becoming increasingly obsolete. High schools across the country have two serious flaws: placing unreasonable value in test scores and the failure to teach life skills. Leaving these problems untreated may be detrimental to the school system, however, a simple innovation could fix them.
Concern for at-risk learners forces the education of high ability learners to take a backseat in traditional classroom. Standard instruction and curriculum based on a pacing and sequencing method does not always allow students to accelerate. By definition, the term “gifted” exemplifies exceptionality often regarding intellect, creativity and leadership. An identification of gifted suggests that an individual requires specialized services and curriculum that are not always addressed by traditional methods of education. High ability learners require a challenging curriculum and specialized educators to prosper academically. The negligence in discharging one’s exceptionality can often lead high-ability learners to foster resentment, boredom and frustration. Traditional instruction and curriculum is not always structured to benefit the needs of exceptional learners. Gifted education programs are essential in educating exceptionally talented students due to the individualized approach toward a student’s unique learning-style. Self -contained gifted classrooms offer a structured environment that allow for social and intellectual growth opposed to the traditional classroom. The inherent flexibility within the gifted program facilitates gifted development of a high-ability learner through acceleration and enrichment.
The United States of America has placed low on the educational ladder throughout the years. The cause of such a low ranking is due to such heavy emphasis on standardized testing and not individual student achievement. Although the United States uses standardized testing as a crutch, it is not an effective measure of a student’s ability, a teacher’s competency, or a school’s proficiency.
that achievement motivation is determined by a range of both personal and social contextual factors, (Dai Y.D 1998) . Emirick (1992) asserts that gifted students often turn their intellectual energy to other activities that are outside the schools curriculum and often they not not perceive school work as a central part of their education, as they find what is being taught irrelevant, this is apparent in John Doe’s case as he believes that reading his own material and not handing in work is more important than what is being taught in class. Therefore we can assume that John Doe feels unchallenged in the classroom and is unmotivated to learn as his cognitive ability is well above the curriculum standards.
Critiques express concern about standardized tests and insist that there should be some way to measure the excellence of students within the same context dictated by strict and uniform educational standard (Baker, 2006; Kohn, 2000). Experts, like Dr. Montessori, do not agree and counter that there are other methods that can be implemented to evaluate each child. They warn about instilling fear and anxiety in students and the consequences to their brain development (Kohn, 1999; Kunimura, 2010; Montessori, 1949; Myers, 2011). Instead they stress the importance of creating an environment that allows trial and error to maximize learning, to mimic real life situations. Proponents of the current educational system continue on and want to even deepen their Common Core Initiative, that strives to align the different state curricular into a unified whole, while basing it on the current school reform (Kohn, 1999; Ravitch, 2010). Scholars on the other hand are deeply concerned about this and refute that it disengages kids in schools and their learning. They argue that children, too, are diverse human beings, just like adults who are naturally different and that school curricular have to be flexible to allow for challenges each leaner brings along. In addition, they object and remind that children are not machines were one manual would do for all. They remind that children are born explorers and natural learners, educating this out of them deploys emotional instability, rejection and skepticism and achieves just the opposite.
Despite the criticism presented here, many still believe that the average IQ test qualifies as enough for a student to gain admittance. Looking back on the Gifted Program’s history, passing the average IQ test with a score above 130 was the only qualification or requirement to gain admittance into the program. Many believed that this caused no harm; therefore, the IQ test remains sufficient today. Also, although there are other and more efficient ways of testing the students, the IQ test does provide useful information that should and does contribute to the decision of whether or not a student gains admittance. It shows a student’s le...
The Talents Unlimited Model was created under the philosophy that all students, both those identified as gifted and those not, would benefit from enrichment programs. The model is used to educate teachers on how to use differentiated instruction to use “higher order cognitive tasks to help students with varying abilities use their preferred thinking talents to manipulate instruction to solve problems, see broad relationships, evaluate varying perspectives, draw comparisons among disparate viewpoints, and predict causes and effects” (Schlichter, 2009, p. 434).
In every elementary school in America third graders are forced to take a test that will greatly impact their academic careers. The G.A.T.E. program, which stands for gifted and talented education, is designed to separate the gifted children from the average and below average kids. However, the G.A.T.E. test is comprised of questions the children do not have the answers for. In other words, the kids are being tested on their innate knowledge of the world and their ability to creatively solve problems they have never encountered. Some might believe there is no flaw in testing a child’s natural intelligence. The test is given to each student and each student is given the same amount of time to complete a test of identical questions. But what educators fail to account for is the social bias of the test and the socio-eco...
Gifted and talented programs are intrinsically valuable to many children’s education as they provide a system in which all students involved are engaged, challenged, and intellectually stimulated. In "How People Learn", Donovan, Bransford, and Pellegrino (1999) stress the importance of each student being given reasonable and appropriate goals based on his or her level of understanding and competency (p. 20). Gifted and talented programs help institutionalize the attempt to meet all student’s needs by providing uniquely appropriate challenges which aim to keep every student engaged, thus receiving the best chance at success. Although there are many valuable and important aspects of gifted education, there are also significant issues rooted in the base of America’s gifted and talented programs, one of which I will address throughout this paper. In my opinion, the most notable problem which troubles gifted and talented programs is the system by which students are selected to join their school’s gifted and talented program.
The bulk of legal cases are in the realm of special education, but only time will tell if gifted education will challenge our highest courts. For now, district administrators and teachers must continue with due diligence to meet the needs of gifted learners, but they must always stay abreast of rulings from the Office of Dispute Resolution. By following the due process hearings, districts can identify commonalities with their own district practice and adjust as needed. Gifted education enrollment numbers are dwarfed by the special education numbers, but the parents of gifted students are no less vocal and often have more resources available to them. Regardless of what the law has said or will say, it is the school’s responsibility to grow all learners, but realize that is our gifted learners who have the innate ability to truly make a difference in our