Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
influence of crusade
the impact of the crusades
religion in the first crusade
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: influence of crusade
In 1095, Pope Urban II called the first crusade. Happening between 1096 and 1099, the first crusade was both a military expedition and a mass movement of people with the simple goal of reclaiming the Holy Lands taken by the Muslims in their conquests of the Levant. The crusade ended with the capture of Jerusalem in July 1099. However, there has been much debate about whether the First Crusade can be considered an ‘armed pilgrimage’ or whether it has to be considered as a holy war. This view is complicated due to the ways in which the Crusade was presented and how the penitential nature of it changed throughout the course of the Crusade.
A major reason why the First Crusade could be viewed as a pilgrimage is because of the number and type of people taking part. While it is true that the first crusade contained an extraordinarily large military contingent of between 50,000 and 60,000 people the first crusade also contained huge numbers of women, children and the elderly, who all fall under the category of non-combatant. So, the first crusade was clearly not just a military undertaking as
…show more content…
Riley-Smith writes that it was the goal of Jerusalem that made the crusade a pilgrimage and both the ways in which he preached the crusade and the measures he took to protect the property of the crusaders shows that the first crusade was intended to be a pilgrimage. The fact that crusade vows and pilgrim vows were indistinguishable only serves to further this view. The confusion arises from the fact that the crusade was a military undertaking and was therefore clearly intended for men who were capable as fighting. This opposes the fact that pilgrimages were supposed to be intended for everyone although it has been shown that this did not stop other groups of people from taking part in the crusade. It is possible therefore to classify the first crusade as a
The 1960’s was a time society fantasized of a better world. However, the horrors of the Vietnam War soon became evident; the mass amounts of death occurring because of the war became a reality. It created a “movement”, especially in American colleges, in order to stand up for what they believed to be “right”. By 1970, many Americans believed sending troops to Vietnam was a mistake, however there were also various individuals becoming increasingly critical of the student antiwar movement
During the 1960’s, there was a rising tide of protests that were taking place. College students began to stand up for their rights and protest for a stronger voice in society. The United States was going through a tough period marked by the Cold War against communism and also the war in Vietnam. From Truman to Nixon the United States government involved the country more and more in Vietnam. Nixon announced a new policy in 1968 called Vietnamization. (Foner, 4th edition, pg.1028) This policy would bring American troops back home, but it neither limited the war nor ended the antiwar movements.
Contrary to many commonly held notions about the first crusade, in his book, The First Crusade and the Idea of Crusading, Jonathan Riley-Smith sets out to explain how the idea of crusading thought evolved in the first crusade. In his book, Riley-Smith sets out five main arguments to show how these ideas of crusading evolved. Firstly, he argues that Pope Urban’s original message was conventional, secondly that a more positive reaction was drawn from the laity (due to the ideas surrounding Jerusalem), thirdly, that the original message of crusading had changed because of the horrible experiences of the first crusaders, fourth, that due to these experiences the crusaders developed their own concept of what a crusade was, and lastly, that these ideas were refined by (religious) writers and turned into an acceptable form of theology. Riley-Smith makes excellent points about the crusade; however, before one can delve directly into his argument, one must first understand the background surrounding the rise of the first crusade.
The first crusade was held only in order to fulfill desire of the Christians of the recapturing the center of the Christian faith-Jerusalem, which has been controlled by the Muslim nation for more than 400 years. This military campaign was followed with severe cruelty and harsh actions against Muslims which cannot be justified with anything but religious and material interest.
In the year 1095 the First Crusade was just beginning. Pope Urban II called Christians to liberate the Holy Land from Muslim oppressors. He promised indulgences and the gift of eternal life in the Kingdom of Heaven for fighting in the holy war. Those that answered the call were peasants, beggars, the poor looking for riches and the unknown looking for glory. What started out as a pilgrimage to help fellow Christians secure their borders and repel foreign invaders soon became the first of many Holy Wars for the Kingdom of God.
The 1960’s was a happening decade. It was a time when many people came together for a common good and stood against injustice. The 60’s is often recalled as the era of the peace sign, one ridden with hippies, marijuana and pacifism. While true of much of the era, some of the movements calling for immense social change began as non-violent harbingers of change and later became radicals. The reason for this turn to radicalism, as seen in the case of the Students for a Democratic Society, and as suggested by the change between this organizations earlier Port Huron statement and the later Weatherman Manifesto, is due to the gradual escalation of the Vietnam war.
The Crusades were great military missions embarked on by the Christian nations of Europe for the purpose of rescuing the Jerusalem and the Holy Land from the hands of the Moslems. The Crusades were considered Holy Wars (1). Their main target was the Moslems not the Jews, although campaigns were also waged against pagan Slavs, Jews, Russian and Greek orthodox Christians, Mongols, Cathars, Hussites, Waldensians Old Prussians, and political enemies of the popes (2). There were many Crusades some more significant than others, but in general the Crusades was an important event in the history of Medieval Europe.
The 1960?s were a time of great disorder among the young people of the America. Students began to stand up for their rights and fight to improve society, even if it meant turning their backs on the government. During the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960?s a new pattern was brought forth in many universities. The university was no longer just a community of learners and educators, but is suddenly became a political arena. But many tend to forget that the majority of the nations 6,700,000 college students were studying peacefully and not causing any trouble in the community (Curry 106). During this time, many changes were brought about in society, some being positive and others being negative. Because of their great passion and effort, students may be considered the most influential group of people during this critical period in history.
Klimke, Martin. “Black and Red Panthers.” In The Other Alliance: Student Protest in West Germany and the United States in the global sixties. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2010.
The Crusades were one of the most prominent events in Western European history; they were not discrete and unimportant pilgrimages, but a continuous stream of marching Western armies (Crusaders) into the Muslim world, terminating in the creation and eventually the fall of the Islamic Kingdoms. The Crusades were a Holy War of Roman Christianity against Islam, but was it really a “holy war” or was it Western Europe fighting for more land and power? Through Pope Urban II and the Roman Catholic Church’s actions, their proposed motivations seem unclear, and even unchristian. Prior to the Crusades, Urban encouraged that Western Europe fight for their religion but throughout the crusades the real motivations shone though; the Crusaders were power hungry, land coveting people who fought with non Christian ideals and Morales.
The pope recruited people from southern Italy to Lombardy, France to Normandy, Flanders to Western Germany, Denmark and other places while on his preaching tour. Despite entering a war, people joined crusades for various reasons and benefits. The reason people joined the Crusades were for beliefs such as, “the certainties of faith; fear of damnation; temporal self-image; material, social, and supernatural profit; the attraction of warfare for a military aristocracy; an unequivocally good cause…” (Tyerman, the Crusades: A Very Short Introduction, p.14). People also went on crusades to clear themselves of their sins by serving God across the territories. People participated in crusades to gain privileges. Participating in the crusades granted families privileges such as church protection, property, interest repayments on debt and more. To gain these privileges, people had to swear a vow to an adoption of a cross, be blessed by a priest, and have the symbol be shown on clothing. In total, between 50,000 and 70,000 men had reached Asia Minor in the participation of the First Crusade with the motivation to spread their religion and conquer
For Christians, the First Crusade was seen as enacting the will of God. It was also seen as a retaking of land they thought belonged to them. Based on the Four Accounts sources, we can see that there were
The 1960s and early 1970s were a complicated era were young adults offered serious critique about major aspects of the nation. In 1960s and 1970s, students were involved in movements like the civil rights movement, the anti-Vietnam War movement, and the women’s movement. In essence, those movements reformed the government policy and changed almost every American life today.During the 1960s and early 1970’s students protesters sought to fix issues they endured in society. For instance, the student protesters aimed to gain more democracy. Nonetheless, it is not very easy to just demand aspects and hope they will come true. Furthermore, those student protestors faced problems and obstacles. In attempt of facing issues they choose nonviolence
The Vietnam war was essentially a surrogate war for the Cold War with the Communist Russians supporting North Vietnam with the anti-Communist United States supporting the South Vietnamese. The war in Vietnam was initially widely supported by the people of the United States. The overwhelming support or apathy of the American people can be seen as Anderson writes “opinion polls demonstrated that about 80 percent supported bombing the North, and the same percentage thought it was “very important” to prevent a Communist South Vietnam” (Anderson 59). Initially there was what appeared to be great support for the war, but this great support was more likely a stronger sense of American apathy towards the United State’s foreign policy. Anderson’s book goes on to mention that “surveys also revealed that two-thirds of the public either had not followed or had no opinion of LBJ’s policy, and a fourth did not even know U.S. troops were in Vietnam” (Anderson 59). It was abundantly clear that there was a lack of awareness on the part of the American people regarding this war, and the appearance of support was not due to an actual approval of policy, but a blindness to what that policy actually was. This support would not be long lasting, however, as people would slowly become aware of what the United States was actually taking part in within this war. The start of this war was
In the mid 1960’s the United States involvement in Vietnam stirred controversy amongst the Americans and politicians. Across the U.S., the American public became increasingly more opposed to the war. Throughout the duration of the war, protesters strived to influence policy makers to withdraw troops from Vietnam by protesting. Demonstrators marched with signs that displayed phrases such as the famous “Make Love, Not War.” Antiwar demonstrations swept the nation from the beginning of the war to definite end in 1975. From this time period, “hippies” became notable figures of period. Long hair, peace signs and grungy hygiene was the face of the era of protests known as the Vietnam Anti-war Movement.