Fire Aggression Case Study

1639 Words4 Pages

2.6.1. 2.Fire Suppression
FAO (2011) stresses that for effective fire management, suppression measures should be employed. Fire suppression measures are activities or actions that are taken when there is a fire outbreak. These measures are meant to minimize damage to the environment, loss of property, loss of crops, loss of human lives and loss of livestock or wildlife (Mushwe, 2011). To suppress fire, there are various techniques that are mainly used in developing countries. These techniques include direct attack and indirect attack. Direct attack refers to actions done in order to cool, beat out, starve or extinguish the flames of a burning fire. The method is mainly taken in lighter fuels on the flaming edge of the fire by creating fire lines that can halt the spread of a fire (Mushwe, 2011).
Equipment or materials such as fire beaters, fire extinguishers, knapsack sprayers, fire tenders, sand buckets, water buckets and water bowsers are essential in fire suppression (Nkhensani, 2011). In some instances, a direct attack fails to achieve the desired result. This is when there are …show more content…

They also argue that there is lack of knowledge on fire suppression techniques and that these techniques mainly exist on paper than in practice. FAO (2011) blames the failure of fire suppression measures to ineffective cooperation between fire management agencies and farmers. In more advanced or developed countries, the suppression methods vary due to increased technological capacity. Although according to the National Interagency Fire Centre (2003) fire suppression is effective in developed countries especially the US, Sugihara et al. (2006) argue that in some instances these suppression measures fail to contain fire which spread and cause extensive damage to forests and

Open Document