Finlay's Critique Of 1421: The Year China Discovered America?

613 Words2 Pages

In popular opinion, Europeans, whether that be the Vikings of the 1000s or the Spaniards in 1492, discovered the New World. Had it not been for Gavin Menzies, Robert Finlay and many others would not have entered the topic of the Chinese discovery of America. The question of whether the Chinese discovered the Americas was a new or at least unanswered one, so when Menzies wrote that they did in fact discover America, others were not so keen on the idea. Finlay, one of these dissenters, actually addressed Menzies’ stance through an article, “How Not to (Re)Write World History: Gavin Menzies and the Chinese Discovery of America”. Menzies’ stance, found in his novel 1421: The Year China Discovered America, being that the Chinese spent months sailing the Western Coast of the Americas and even …show more content…

Finlay’s argument was not to bring new ideas to the table, but rather dismiss Menzies’ idea due to what he saw as flimsy evidence and a misleading writing style (Finlay 37).
To analyze the two arguments, the writings must be seen as different. Menzies’ novel is a constructed narrative of history on a topic otherwise untold. On the other hand, Finlay’s critique is built for its subject and is not supposed to be ground-breaking, as it sticks with the accepted history. Because of these traits, the styles used by the authors are varied. Menzies seems to create elaborate connections from the smaller details and shuts out the possibility of himself being wrong. For example, his “black seed” evidence was based on one species originating solely from China, dismissing the trade that occurred between the Western and Eastern world, specifically for products native to Asia. Not to proclaim his evidence wrong,

Open Document