More handpicked essays just for you.
To Build a Fire by Jack London thesis
To Build a Fire by Jack London thesis
Jack london to build a fire criticism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: To Build a Fire by Jack London thesis
Hey you! Now that I have your attention may I ask you if you have ever seen the movie Finding Nemo? If so, then you would know why he was taken, right? IF you haven’t then all that can be said is that it was his fault. It could have easily been avoided if he had listened to his father. Although it was just a Disney movie, it still relates to the topic that people in a fatal situation should be held accountable for their actions. Like the men aboard the James Carid, some life or death situations cannot be avoided. But people tend to take “uncalculated” risks that put them in a possible life or death situation.For example, in the story “To Build a Fire” by Jack London, the guy knew the consequences but he still decided to go too the snow and
Richard Connells “The Most Dangerous Game” is a short story which illustrates that calm analytical thinking can increase your odds of survival and controlling panic.
Everyone has taken risks whether they be big or not, they will lead you down the path you choose in life. In the short stories Beowulf, Black Heart, and The Deep taking risks was a big part in all three. In Beowulf, there is many risks that he took, but the main one was that he risked his life to save the people that he loved. In the second book Black Heart by Mark Brazaitis, the girl risked her life to make friends with something she knew could kill her because she was so lonely. In the final book, The Deep by Anthony Doerr the main character made risks every day because he never knew if he was going to wake up to see the next.
forced to kill. It ended up that he was the last one left on the island except
In the short story "A Matter of Balance," the main character is shown to be very cautious, never taking risks unless he absolutely has to. An example of this would be where Harold, who is the main character, says, "there was no sense in taking more chances than necessary" (p. 234). This shows how even though he may seem overcautious, he knows what would be a better choice to make in order to survive.
Do all life choices escort to unsystematic consequences? Why or why not? In the "Lady or the Tiger" by Frank Stockton, The Princess's lover, was forced to decide between two doors, and the consequence was mysterious. In addition, he did not recognize where the tiger or the lady was hidden. Even though, it was an alternative between life and death, nevertheless it was unidentified. This essay will debate regarding the foremost theme for "The Lady or The Tiger", upon which it discusses how decisions are tremendously significant, albeit they sometimes do not appear akin it.
Christopher McCandless made the decision in April of 1992 to venture into the Alaskan wilderness, inspired by the Transcendentalist works of Henry David Thoreau, along with the works of other authors. This decision was made without consulting anyone, and this decision famously ended with McCandless’ death months later. For most people, the idea of living in the secluded Alaskan wilds without any means of communication or navigation is a sign of mental illness. When McCandless made this decision, he effectively ignored the opinions of thousands of people, and decided that his views were somehow more valid. This ideology of “a challenge in which a successful outcome is assured isn't a challenge at all” led to McCandless embarking on a challenge in which a successful outcome was not only not assured, but simply not possible (Krakauer 182). Had McCandless talked to anyone, literally anyone at all, he would’ve been told that this plan was a suicide mission. This shows that the opinions of the general population can be lifesaving.
With the many ethical and social issues faced during the Everest simulation, came with many tough decisions that had to be made. As mentioned above, a specific example was the decision I as the leader was faced with in decision set 2. To take the utilitarian approach, which was to keep going and the photographer was to catch up with the group – resulting in the highest number of points for the team. Or the deontological approach which was to wait for the photographer but risk even more members of the group being recued. As stated above, Conway and Gawronski outlined that people immediately experience a negative emotional response to the idea of an individual getting hurt. In the case of the simulation it was leaving the photographer behind
What triggers, and to what severity, drive one to the last resort of risking
What drives people to take these crazy risks, they do all sorts of crazy actions, just to undertake a mission. An example is that Annie Johnson had many challenges to face and still had accomplish her goal. Aengus wanted to find love, while Galarza and Johnson were determined to survive desperate circumstances, however all three shared an ability to endure hardship to accomplish their goals.
Would you take a risk, knowing that there could be potential consequences? Taking a risk is the exposure of a loss and even harm. The subject of risks are a tricky. Most people aren't daring enough, and they wouldn’t gamble with their safety. On the other hand, sometimes the reward is greater, and it makes the risk worth it. Risk is a strategy that is prevalent in Welcome to the Monkey House by Kurt Vonnegut. Vonnegut uses the strategy of risks to show the conflicts and decisions that characters in his stories had to make. The use of conflict and decisions are used in the stories A Long Walk to Forever and Next Door” Doing this reveals an aspects of the characters identity and shows if they are willing to take any chances.
Jim in “Breaking Through Uncertainty—Welcoming Adversity” faces the fear of death. First, “I was confronted with a life-threatening situation” (Paragraph 3). Jim is thinking negative and there is no backing down. This shows he has overconfident in him because it interferes with the ability to make correct decision. Secondly, “Having
For instance when Percy jumps off the gateway arch. “Father, help me, I prayed. I turned and jumped. My clothes on fire, poison coursing through my veins, I plummeted toward the river. -Lightning Theif page 211. This shows Percy taking a risk that his dad will save him from the venom, this is his only option to live and not die. Another example is when Percy and his friends go into the underworld, where no one has ever come back alive. This is a big risk, because no one has ever came back from the underworld so the percentages that Percy and his friends will come back alive is slim, but it’s the only way he can save his mom. Instead of saving his mom, Percy uses the three pearls on him and his friends. “I turned and faced my mother. I desperately wanted to sacrifice myself and use the last pearl on her, but I knew what she would say. She would never allow it. I had to get the bolt back to Olympus and tell Zeus the truth. I had to stop the war.” - The Lightning Thief. The last example supports my thematic statement because, even though it’s a big risk, Percy knows his mom would tell him to save himself and that it will all turn out ok in the
In the informational text “Is Survival Selfish?” Lane Wallace claims that there are different situation that determines how someone would act during a survival situation. Whether someone should save themselves or jump into the front line to save others is all up to whether or not the situation and their instinct allows. In a situation where saving yourself is the only choice, it is not selfish, but rather smart. During the mountain climbing incident, Yates was unable to save his friend so he “ended up cutting the rope to Simpson to save himself. Miraculously, Simpson survived the 100 foot fall and eventually made his way down the mountain. But Yates was criticized by some for his survival decision, even though the alternative would have almost
Many people believe that making decisions is like writing on a chalkboard, easily done and easily erased. In spite of this widely accepted idea, it has proven to be very inaccurate. Before making a life altering decision based on pure whim, a person must take a step back and ask himself or herself if the outcome will be worth the sacrifice. Every character eventually realizes that the sacrifices they had to make were not worth reaching their idea of a utopian world, and in time, their impermeability is broken down when they realize they are not invincible. Decisions are meant to consume time and not be solely based off of motivation; therefore, if a person is not willing to become conscious of every possible outcome they may eventually be faced with numerous unintended consequences.
If life were merely a contest with fate, then should we not think before we act? Though some may argue that the proper time to reflect is before acting, I have learned from experience that, more times than not, this is not the best approach. The ability to act on instinct is crucial to success, in many situations. During an earthquake, for instance, one must quickly respond in whichever way necessary to protect themselves, as well as their loved ones. No matter how prepared, or trained, one may be, there is no way to predict what the essential motions should be taken at the time of an emergency.