Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Influence of money and patronage in Renaissance period
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
This paper will explore in mostly chronological order the financial escapades of theater in England during the 17th century. During the reign of James I and Charles I the theatre flourished gaining most of its support from nobility. During the Reformation, theater could not prosper without support which everyone was too scared to provide. After the Restoration of the monarchy, the nobility tried a different approach of managing the theaters by giving the monopoly to a William Davenant and Thomas Killigrew. Most of the responsibility of finding funds fell on what the managers could scrape out of the theater goers pocket. Specific managers were set up to look after the wellbeing of the theater, rather than a patron noble. Money and support still came from the monarchy but not as much as before the Reformation. When William III inherited the throne, the theater was left to its own devises and changed hands many times through the end of the century.
In 1603, the public acting companies came under the direct control of the monarchy when James I ascended the throne. James inherited a lot of financial problems and left England deep in a debt of more than £400,000 when he died. James immediately became patron to the theater when he came into power. The Lord Chamberlain’s men became the King’s men, and the Admiral’s company became Prince Henry’s men. The raise in social status gave the actors the right to call themselves gentlemen. The rest of society somewhat tolerated this social change, but amongst themselves did not acknowledge the status of actors as gentlemen.
At the beginning of the century in 1608 the playhouses were shut down for a year due to plague. Actors within the two companies were paid the same as unskill...
... middle of paper ...
...t & Co., 1879. TheatreDatabase.com. Web. 19 November 2011.
Boswell, Eleanore B. The Restoration Court Stage, 1660-1702, with a particular account of the production of Calisto. New York: Barnes & Noble, 1966. Print
Edwards, Philip. Threshold of a Nation: A Study in English and Irish Drama. London: Cambridge University Press, 1979. Print.
Gurr, Andrew. The Shakespeare Company, 1594-1642. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2004. Print.
McLean, Ralph. "James VI And I And His Patronage Of The Arts." Britain in Print. Web. 20 Nov. 2011.
Owen, Susan J. A Companion to Restoration Drama. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2008. Print
Wilson, John H. A Preface to Restoration Drama. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1965. Print.
Before the life on Broadway, before famous hit musicals such as the Sweeney Todd, Phantom, Chicago and Annie, that drove people into New York to see America’s professional theatre. The America’s professional theatre was spread throughout the country. In the mid- to late-19th century, actors and managers would put together a company and tours playing for weeks at a time in cities such as Chicago, San Francisco and they also performed in little towns along the way. But then came the Theatrical Syndicate, which was often referred to as “The Syndicate.” Which composed of six men that would change the United States theatre forever.
Theatres and How We Had Fun." Little, Brown, and Company. (Boston, Toronto, London); 1991. P. 139, 144.
Daum, Gary. "Chapter 12 The Baroque Era (1600-1750)." Georgetown Prep. 1994. Georgetown University. 12 July 2005 .
The Old Globe Theatre had many rules, but most of them changed after it was destroyed in a fire in 1613. One of the rules that dramatically changed was the system that...
Russell Brown, J. 1995. The Oxford Illustrated History of the Theatre. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
During the years of 1909 and 1914, Diaghilev’s Ballets Russes transformed into a “vast commercial undertaking” from an accessory to the Imperial Theatres of St. Petersburg, Russia. Garafola states that “unlike Russia, the West offered a home to such an enterprise—in the operatic market (Garafola 177).” It is important to note that Russian theatres were only for the wealthy and political dignitaries of the time, whereas, Parisian life offered ballet to the common people, thus allowing for a larger market. Garafola paints a fascinating picture of the capitalistic and often quite difficult nature of the theatres. Though the season of 1909 was a great artistic success, ticket sales and monetary profit proved it to be a financial disaster. In a
The rise of provincial companies in Elizabethan England had a profound effect on the organization and control of drama. A large proportion of acting companies made a business of strolling. In doing so, they escaped local responsibilities and made it difficult for any community to hold them responsible for their conduct. A strolling actor was viewed as a potential menace to society because he was masterless, and therefore irresponsible. The law recognized this, and in 1572, a statute was passed requiring traveling players to “be the retainers of some baron of this realme, or … other honorable personage of greater degree,” or to “have licence of two justices of the peace at the least” (Albright 7). It became mandatory for the group of strollers to have a patron responsible for their conduct in order to give license for them to perform. This law was revived throughout the years and over time, became the chief support for opponents of drama.
Behan, Brendan. The Quare Fellow. Modern Irish Drama. Ed. John P. Harrington. New York: W.W. Norton & Co, Inc, 1991. 255-310.
Gainor, J. Ellen., Stanton B. Garner, and Martin Puchner. The Norton Anthology of Drama, Shorter Edition. New York: W. W. Norton &, 2010. Print.
2. Setterquist, Jan. Ibsen and the Beginnings of Anglo-Irish Drama. New York: Gordian Press, 1974. 46 - 49, 58 - 59, 82 - 93, 154 - 166.
During the mid 14th century, the black plague was running rampant. The church, being a state of God, did not know how to cure these people, causing those who came to them in need, asking why God was killing their family and friends, to become disillusioned. This caused many to turn away from the church, and look inwards instead, leading to the hugely influencial humanist movement. It was through these changes within their society that theatre was able to change and blossom into an act of freedom, a means in which society and state could be critiqued, a way to bring their viewers some escape from their hard laberous
Actors were expected to memorize hundreds of lines at a time. While one play could be performing, actors would be practicing lines for their next show. Play writers also began to make roles for the actors in the theatrical pieces. The theaters that actors performed in were roofless so that the sun could be used as lighting. Theatrical shows were held in the afternoon because it provided the best amount of light for the show. When the people gathered into the theater, the different classes of people were separated by where they could afford to sit and watch the show. The lower classmen were situated on the bare earth where it was dirty and smelly because it was never cleaned. The owners’ of the theaters found it less expensive if they did not keep high maintenance of their establishments. Higher classmen sat under a roof and for a penny more, they could buy cushions for their seats.
Modern day Theater hasn’t changed much from 20th Century Theater. However, European Theater is nothing like 20th Century American Theater. 20th Century Theater was greatly influenced by World War I, World War II, and the Great Depression. This caused lack of communication in families, which was shown in the play Landscape.
...munist. In spite of their lack of knowledge, Congress removed all assets from The Federal Theatre Project ventures. The additional three Arts Developments which were Music, Art, and Writing continued to be sponsored by Congress up to nineteen forty one. The Federal Theatre Project had produced theatre for millions who had never been exposed to theatre before, the organization hired heaps of individuals, and it brought European epic theatre and Living Newspaper theatre methods to America, and therefore can possibly be viewed as an immense achievement. For all intents and purposes its impact made an exceptional improvement in the American theatre. The Federal Theatre Project has revealed the devastating consequences that can arise in the United States when political figures and officials have decisive jurisdiction exceeding what ought to remain an imaginative venture.
Jeffares, A. Norman. "Farquhar's Final Comedies." Images of Invention: Essays on Irish Writing. Gerrards Cross, England: Colin Smythe, 1996. 76-89. Rpt. in Drama Criticism. Ed. Lawrence J. Trudeau. Vol. 38. Detroit: Gale, 2010. Literature Resource Center. Web. 28 Mar. 2014.