Financial Analysis (Wk 5)
In respect to Google Inc. (GOOG) and Yahoo! Inc. (YHOO), I will use the financial statements for the most recent fiscal year filed with the SEC and for earlier periods. This information will be obtained by utilizing the value line which is available in the Stafford Library but I will use Yahoo Finance. In addition, they can also be found on the company websites. For assisting myself in future projects that will require my recommendations, I will briefly describe what they mean to me. This is an important process of understanding financial management whereas it is important to understand the various ratios and financials by examining and detailing and contrasting the information.
In the chart listed below it displays stock prices of Google (GOOG) and Yahoo (YHOO) starting in the calendar with balance ending year balance. The range has been taken from 2008 to 2012 which reflects stock prices, and the end of year percent change.
Google Inc. (GOOG) starting in year 2008 ($679.69) through ending year 2012 ($702.24) has risen to only 3 percent in 5 years. This percentage is small in nature, but its overall performance remains at a continuous growth. In comparison, Yahoo! Inc. (YHOO) starting in year 2008 ($23.80) through ending year 2012 ($18.55) has decreased to -22 percent in 5 years.
In the Market Performance chart, it is broken into two categories which are Earnings per Share and Price Earnings Ratio. As with any market it is important to understand and gauge key performance indicators and evaluate these goals as it establishes the execution for the future. In the Market performance chart EPS; it measures the firm’s performance, and provides to the shareholder an amount of earnings available. Both Google Inc. (GOOG) and Yahoo! Inc. (YHOO) since 2008 continue to increase in a 5 year review as GOOG in 2012 established an 85% increase while YHOO merged to a staggering 1080%.
Market Performance Chart
Addressing Price Earnings Ratio, the considerations for both companies seems to be at opposites. From 2008 through 2012 GOOG had increased their P/E ratio by 25% which is an indicator of what the market believes each dollar is worth of annual earnings, but cautiously could be overvalued until validated by increased earnings. As with YHOO, it has deflated to a -59%.
As the old saying goes, “Look before you leap” may be one of the most important steps in preventing a whole in your pocket.
The stock price is currently 103.31, down from a recent high of 121.50. The P/E ratio is declining at 28 and beta at .67, which is expected to grow closer to 1.0. A recent earnings surprise last December yielded a 15% difference from the lower expectations and the latest earnings reports late last month also surprised investors. Estimates for the 2000 fiscal year are being raised by a large majority of analyst who believe that earnings per share will increase and the stock price will reach close to 150.
I recommend a strong buy on Cisco’s stock with a target price of $32.50, a 50% upside from its current price. Cisco has a solid competitive advantage, because there are not many strong competitors in the market. The other firms show a higher P/E ratio than Cisco because they have a lower market share. The company shows a constant growth. Cisco markets its products globally with the highest market shares than its competitors. The main risks for Cisco are worsening of economic conditions or exchange rates. The company has a good growth in sales, which will lead higher profits. The company also gives out an annualized dividend to its shareholders every year.
The fourth ratio we will analyze is earnings per share. Earnings per share (EPS) are the number of dollars earned during the period on behalf of each outstanding share of common stock.
To collect relevant data, the annual percentage change in net income per common share diluted, net income/net revenues, the major income statement accounts to net revenues, return on stockholders’ equity, the price/earnings (P/E) ratio, and the book values per share for each year numbers were examined. In order for Sun Microsystems to see a greater return in its bottom line assets, it must consider an alternative approach in operating its organization.
Firstly, based on the profitability, P&G has earned higher profit from each dollar of revenue which is 13.4% compared to C-P 12.9% for the recent year 2013. In addition, P&G also has higher EPS of US$4.04 compare to C-P US$2.41. In contrast, C-P register a Gross Profit of 58.7% and Return on Equity of 91.0% as opposed to P&G’s 49.6% and 17.0% respectively. C-P seems to rely heavily on debt and this has helped to improve the Return of Equity. P&G also has its downside in asset turnover ratio (0.62) and fixed turnover
...rs, setting a good trend for the corporation. They also have a very low debt-to-equity ratio, indicating that they have enough equity to easily pay off any funds acquired from creditors. As a creditor I would feel safe in lending them funds for any future projects or endeavors.
...as not only been reliable when it arises to offering a product of the highest and excellence, nonetheless is also continually developing, adjusting, but more meaningfully revolutionizing the industry. Also, what creates Google’s invention so matchless in assessment to its challengers is the attention that it offers to consumer requirements in order to offer a consistent and difficultly substituted the product rather than concentrating on exploiting its profit with each given chance which may cooperation the quality of its search consequence its product. Having examined the company’s internal and external environment it is obvious that Google earnings care and attentions even to the smallest detail to guarantee that it will be the leading company between many other online search engines and has been able to create loyal customers that are continually growing.
You would not buy a home, car or other large purchases without researching what product offered you the most for your money. The same is true when investing in a company. Investors do avid research on multiple companies to find what company matches the investors' criteria. In this paper Team C will research both AT&T and Verizon's financial documents. Team C will compare selected ratios, cash flow and make recommendations how both companies can manage cash flow for the future.
The financial position of a company offers great insight on the performance of the company on short-term and long-term basis. This work argues that Facebook Inc. is a company with a subjective investment portfolio. The purpose of this paper is to use ratio analysis to determine the position of the Facebook as an investment destination. The first section explores two ratios and their implications to a potential investor. The second part evaluates whether Facebook is bankrupt. The succeeding section offers advice to potential investors. The work culminates by highlighting key points and making necessary recommendations.
The two companies that created these search engines have billions of dollars and numerous other resources at their disposal available for the research, the development and the innovation of their products or services. But even if you have all the funds in the world at your fingertips, if you have a bad brand image in the consumers eyes your brand will have extreme difficulty inserting itself in the market. So how does the public perceive these brands?
Before beginning an analysis of a company it is necessary to have a complete set of financial statements, preferably for the pas few years so that historical trends can be obtained. Ratios are a way for anyone to get an idea of the financial performance of a company by using the information contained in the financial statements. Ratios are grouped into four basic categories, liquidity, activity, profitability, and financial leverage. This document will use a variety of these ratios to analyze the firm, Sample Company, as of December 31,2000.
Choosing two profitable stocks amongst a myriad of potential alternatives is a daunting task to say the least. In order to narrow my choices from thousands to two, I examined several aspects of companies I was interested in. Among these were, company overview, alpha and beta ratings, price ratios, price charts, and company headlines. After evaluating this information, I chose Intuit INC (INTU) listed on the NASDAQ and Johnson and Johnson (JNJ) listed on the NYSE.
Google’s Stock Price was around $ 110, but it is now traded at around $500. What made this big difference? In order to understand why google’s stock price increased to reach this level we have to understand what makes it special from the way they treat their employees.
Any successful business owner or investor is constantly evaluating the performance of the companies they are involved with, comparing historical figures with its industry competitors, and even with successful businesses from other industries. To complete a thorough examination of any company's effectiveness, however, more needs to be looked at than the easily attainable numbers like sales, profits, and total assets. Luckily, there are many well-tested ratios out there that make the task a bit less daunting. Financial ratio analysis helps identify and quantify a company's strengths and weaknesses, evaluate its financial position, and shows potential risks. As with any other form of analysis, financial ratios aren't definitive and their results shouldn't be viewed as the only possibilities. However, when used in conjuncture with various other business evaluation processes, financial ratios are invaluable. By examining Ford Motor Company's financial ratios, along with a few other company factors, this report will give a clear picture of how the company is doing now and should do in the future.
Google’s internal structure stability can be influenced by external factors. To ensure the right decisions made, they must complete external and internal analysis. Google’s must contend with external environment influences, which are political, economical, and a technological. Day after day must be able to understand how the external environment influences can provide advantages to obtaining opportunities but on the downside expose the threats that Google has to overcome to be successful. For Google to maximize the market opportunities, Google must recognize its internal value, rarity, and organization. To exploit the company’s strength and weakness, Google must comprise an SWOT analysis. When Google accomplishes the SWOT analysis, they will understand the company’s strengths and weaknesses. It will also demonstrate the environmental opportunities and the threats that are facing in this competitive market. Once this analysis completed, Google can plan strategic plan to utilize their strengths, improve upon their weaknesses, maximize their opportunities, and eliminate threats that can endanger their growth as a company.