preview

Final Project

explanatory Essay
1954 words
1954 words
bookmark

Section 7: Emergency Preparations in Minneapolis Following the attacks on the World Trade Centers in 2001, Minneapolis Minnesota began to incorporate many disaster-mitigating defenses, including necessary steps should the city experience a major disaster, including bridge collapse. Minneapolis experienced a successful recovery effort following the I-35 bridge collapse. This success is largely due to the investments the city has made to strengthen public safety in the area. These emergency response improvements involved funding to improve critical infrastructure and emergency personnel which also included additional training to help emergency responders work across organizational boundaries. Listed are a few of the steps that Minneapolis had taken prior to the bride collapse. • The state practiced snap assembly of an emergency operations center, where agencies could quickly coordinate their immediate response to a tragedy • Minneapolis studied where to place massive amounts of debris following a disaster • Most local law enforcement officials had updated radio systems, allowing them to talk to each other in emergencies. This was found to be an issue during the recovery efforts after 9/11 • The Minnesota Department of Transportation developed traffic plans in case a bridge failed • The bridge disaster was the first major test of state emergency response systems developed after years of practice and special urgency following Sept. 11, 2001, and Hurricane Katrina The public safety community completed the following plans prior to the I-35 Bridge disaster: • Deployed an 800 MHz Protocol Project 25 (P25) trunked LMR radio system that was shared across local, county and state agencies. • Invested in a $5.2M dollar computer-aided di... ... middle of paper ... ...he chances of additional collapse. When instability was suspected, fire Command made an appropriate decision to evacuate responders from the bridge until the area could be deemed safe enough for continued operations. • All but one of the patients who survived the bridge collapse and were transported to a hospital, survived to discharge from the hospital. The one patient who was pronounced dead at the hospital experienced cardiopulmonary arrest on the scene and had little to no chance of surviving. • Local EMs plans worked well. The Metro EMS Incident Response Plan (IRP) was used success- fully by all EMS personnel who responded as mutual aid providers. (Mutual aid agreements are not managed through the IRP.) • EMs response was rapid and in sufficient quantity. Units approached the scene from different directions allowing for a rapid, 360-degree scene assessment.

In this essay, the author

  • Explains that the state practiced snap assembly of an emergency operations center, where agencies could quickly coordinate their immediate response to a tragedy.
  • Explains that most local law enforcement officials had updated radio systems, allowing them to talk to each other in emergencies. this was an issue during the recovery efforts after 9/11.
  • Explains that the bridge disaster was the first major test of state emergency response systems developed after years of practice and special urgency following sept. 11, 2001, and hurricane katrina.
  • Explains the deployment of an 800 mhz protocol project 25 trunked lmr radio system that was shared across local, county and state agencies.
  • Explains that they invested in a $5.2m computer-aided dispatch system capable of mapping all emergency response vehicles with global positioning service (gps).
  • Explains that the national incident management system (nims) training was extended to all employee levels to help ensure that emergency responders understood their respective roles during a disaster, acted collectively and shared necessary information with designated decision makers.
  • Explains that special operations teams were developed at a cost of $8m, which included hazardous materials, collapsed structures, and bomb teams.
  • Analyzes how the timeline of events demonstrates that emergency resources were mobilized quickly and effectively during the disaster.
  • Explains that minneapolis earmarked $20 million to purchase new 800 mhz radios. minneapolis was ranked as one of six leading cities in tactical interoperability communications.
  • Explains that the city spent $5.2 million on a state-of-the-art computer-aided dispatch system that has the capability to map the location of all emergency response vehicles equipped with global positioning systems.
  • Explains that minneapolis needed specialized teams with technical skills that would be used in various disaster situations. the city created three special response teams at a cost of $8 million.
  • Explains that minnesota now has a comprehensive plan for storing and distributing pharmaceuticals in the event of widespread disease.
  • Reports that all individuals on the bridge and next to the water have been rescued. the rescue phase of operation is now complete. recovery operations will officially begin at dawn on 8/2.
  • Reports that 50 patients have been transported to various hospitals by ems. 61 units including 31 ambulances have responded. 110 people will require treatment at hospitals or emergency clinics.
  • Explains that local leaders had taken fema's integrated emergency management course and credited it as a major factor in their level of preparedness.
  • Explains that the new 800 mhz radio system streamlined communications and enabled successful connections among a variety of organizations and agencies.
  • Explains how technology played a major role in managing the response and recovery efforts, from real-time situational awareness provided by site video cameras to the web-based geographic information system (gis) common operating picture and traffic management systems.
  • Explains that first-responder units arrived quickly and established their incident commands based on ics principles that affix responsibility for specific functions to subordinate command officers.
  • Explains that engineers and bridge contractor personnel moved rap- idly to size up the stability of the bridge and to evaluate the chances of additional collapse. when instability was suspected, fire command evacuated responders.
  • Explains that all but one of the patients who survived the bridge collapse and were transported to a hospital, survived to discharge from the hospital.
  • Explains that the metro ems incident response plan (irp) was used success-fully by everyone who responded as mutual aid providers. mutual aid agreements are not managed through the irp
  • Explains that ems response was rapid and in sufficient quantity. units approached the scene from different directions allowing for a rapid, 360-degree scene assessment.
  • Explains minneapolis' disaster-mitigating defenses after the 2001 attacks on the world trade centers, including necessary steps should the city experience a major disaster, such as the i-35 bridge collapse.
  • Describes the interagency disaster training exercises held in advance of an actual event to determine the effectiveness of their overall strategies, which allowed the public safety community to identify problems before the disaster.
  • Explains the impact of the i-35 bridge collapse on businesses in the minneapolis area. a business continuity plan allows businesses to prepare for unforeseeable events that could impact their business.
  • Reports that minneapolis fire department dispatched to the bridge for a reported bridge collapse. dispatch received data from bridge cameras confirming extent of damage.
  • Describes how the emergency operations center (eoc) opened and staffed 24 hours a day for next four days. hennepin county sheriff’s office supervisor arrives on scene and assumes command of water rescue activities.
  • Opines that the i-35w bridge collapse represented one of the most challenging events a city can face.
  • Analyzes how the minneapolis emergency services community's cooperation between first responders, mutual-aid resources, and state and federal partners was outstanding.
Get Access