Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How do we remember the Holocaust through films
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How do we remember the Holocaust through films
From the past to present many scholars, filmmakers, and historians engage on an ongoing debate between film’s using a piece of memory to retell the history of events in the past. Filmmakers can also take on the role of historians, but as an alternate retelling of a specific event, unless it is a biopic. Marita Sturken uses the example of Oliver Stone’s docudramas to explain how Stone, himself is using his experiences to retell the story. Besides using his experiences, he tries to recreate history with docudramas that question the legitimacy, while Barbie Zelizer uses Steven Spielberg as a filmmaker to retell history through the retelling of a novel. Both authors use a filmmaker and specific examples of their work to explore how individuals remember major events without specifically witnessing them; specifically Sturken focusing on the legitimacy of Stone and while Zelizer uses Spielberg and his documentary style to address the event of the Holocaust.
Sturken uses Stone’s credibility of his past to determine the legitimacy of the docudramas created by Stone. Stone as a filmmaker is often thought of as the individual that Americans were looking for by having his well-known films Platoon and Born on the Fourth of July that represented history well due to the credibility he had for serving in the war. Sturken uses this as an early example to prove her point on how history is represented from a specific perspective. Although later on in her article she uses Stone’s other films about government conspiracies, which shows that he does not have the authority to create a false history within the American culture through his presidential films. By having films being created under the genre of “docudrama” it can create a misconception of wha...
... middle of paper ...
...on on how accurately it is represented without distorting how we remember the past.
Filmmakers as historians have been discussed throughout major events that occur and can only be remembered as much. The filmmakers can use genres such as docudramas or documentary style ways of telling the narrative of the event, but is only limited to what certain documents that they can pull from to tell the story. In addition to that the filmmaker’s decision to include or exclude certain things can only capture a portion of the event without “first-hand experience”. Stone and Spielberg are historian filmmakers that carefully select specific scenes that can accurately represent major events through their own credibility or popular culture. The film then may not appeal to everyone, but does not distort how we would remember the past to great extent, but rather keep us remembering.
Films are necessary in our time period because the human eye can articulate the message intended through sight allowing visual imagination to occur. In the book, world 2 by Max Brooks, he creates a character by the name Roy Elliot who was a former movie director. Roy Elliot manages to make a movie titled “Victory at Avalon: The Battle of the Five Colleges” and some how it goes viral. Similarly, Frank Capra’s film, “Why we Fight” expresses a sense of understanding the meaning of wars. Films do not inevitably portray truth because they display what the film director views as important and beneficial for people to know.
In today's day and age, it's rare to see famous historical events and societal disasters not be picked apart by film directors and then transformed into a box office hit. What these films do is put a visual perspective on these events, sometimes leaving viewers speculating if whatever was depicted is in fact entirely true. I have never felt that feeling more than after I finished watching Oliver Stone’s JFK.
This report aims to make light of certain elements of documentary making that are perhaps more susceptible to influence on the director’s part, and once again explore the effect of these decisions on the audience’s reaction to the information presented.
There is no secret that films in the genre of biopic can often stretch the truth. These types of movies are frequently mere depictions of myth that is loosely based on factual accounts rather than being accurate representations of history. Many ethical dilemmas arise from these circumstances. Among those are the damaging representations that may skew a viewer’s perception of how history may have actually played out. Should filmmakers warn viewers that certain historical details of their forthcoming motion picture have been changed for the purpose of film? What are the editorial ethics when important details pertaining to vital pieces of history are left on the proverbial cutting room floor? The brand new film “Cesar Chavez” does a lot of work to bring about the often untold story of the California migrant farmworkers labor activism and organizing, yet in the process, manages to erase the pertinent contributions of the Filipino who many consider as the pioneers of these movements.
In this day in age, it is very common to find films adapted from books. Many of those films do a very well in their adaptations, but some fall short. Since it was finished, and even before its release date, the V for Vendetta film has gained some controversy from its own author. But, although the film did not end up how Alan Moore, the author, would have wanted it, he did not contribute to the project, even so, the filmography very clearly kept with the original work and showed itself as a product of the time.
Thompson, Kristin , and David Bordwell. Film History : An Introduction. 3 ed. New York:
Rosenstone, R. A. (2000). Oliver Stone as Historian. In R. B. Toplin, Oliver Stone's USA: Film, History and Controversy (pp. 27-28). Kansas: University of Kansas Press.
For some, it seems that the Holocaust in another lifetime, but for others it will be something they will never forget. Holocaust was a time for fighting. The Jewish would fight for the right to live as they were killed solely for being Jewish. The Holocaust began in 1939 and would continue through 1945. It was introduced by Nazi leader Adolf Hitler, although he did not act alone. His mission would be to “exterminate” all minorities, but most abundantly, the Jews. Based on information given by About.com, it is estimated that 11 million people were killed during the Holocaust. Six million of these were Jews.
Holocaust Facts The Holocaust has many reasons for it. Some peoples’ questions are never answered about the Holocaust, and some answers are. The Holocaust killed over 6 million Jews (Byers.p.10.) Over 1.5 million children (Byers, p. 10). They were all sent to concentration camps to do hard labor work.
In Defiance, the deviations from the historical record are used to emphasis certain aspects of the movie. In the beginning sequence the audience can see how there is a mesh of video of Hitler imposed with footage that the director made to look older. If a person had never seen the original footage they would not see the subtle mixture of fact and fiction. But this practice raises the question should directors be able to add or subtract from the historical accuracy of a movie, especially one with a subject matter such as the Holocaust. In the case of movies that are based on the real life experiences of individuals the deviation makes the matter more accessible to a large group of people. There are many aspects of someones life are not easily readable when place on the screen. In order for them to be understood some liberty must be given to the director to make them understandable to someone who may not know the culture or the traditions behind the actions. In a scene of Defiance Zus, played by Liev Schreibe...
...ctual roles, or adding in exciting events that revise the storyline. These changes are beneficial to producers because they engage a large audience and generate massive profits. In contrast, they do not always have a positive effect on viewers. Although they are entertaining which is an important aspect of theatre culture, they also are often misguiding. Many spectators take movies at face value, without considering that they may not exactly qualify as primary source material. Even when an historical event is fabricated to teach or enhance a moral message, it still doesn’t compensate for bending the truth. Moviegoer’s may have a positive experience and gain some skewed historical perspective, perhaps better than what they knew before the movie, but they loose out on the truth and therefore, a genuine understanding of the historical event, and its significance.
One of the most defining films in American Film history is Orson Welles' 1941 cult classic, Citizen Kane. While the film is widely regarded for several cinematic elements such as its cinematography and background score, what stands out is the narrative style employed by Welles and co-screenplay writer, Herman J. Mankiewicz. Perhaps, what is most noteworthy was the demand the film made of its audience, to follow and deduce the plot as it unraveled, something we are used to as film viewers of this generation, but for its times was path breaking. The cinematic techniques used such as telling a story through a series of flashbacks, the use of deep focus camera shots, the use of low angles and chiaroscuro lighting enhanced the viewing experience and these remain
In conclusion, we can see in film narrative The Birth of a Nation has progressed from the trick film narrative of Mary Jane’s Mishap to being identified according to Gunning as being of the third genre, due to both profitability and popularity of realistic cinema Moving from being of theatrical proscenium to complex cinematography to tell a story suited for the screen.
Postmodernism theory when associated with films can be represented as the delay of skepticism audience is broken in order to free public understanding of the work of the director. Small alterations are made to create a different and important meaning in the vision of the public. The director has created a work of art that takes the audience of conventional and emotional attachment to the subject, creating a new point of view.
Williams, Linda. “Mirrors without Memories. Truth, History, and the New Documentary.” Film Quarterly 46.3 (1993): 9-21.