Film Reflection Of 'The Hound Of The Baskervilles'

836 Words2 Pages

The Hound of the Baskervilles Film Reflection The Hound of the Baskervilles, was written by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle as part of his Sherlock Holmes series phenomena. The 1939 movie directed by Sidney Lanfield, closely follows Doyle’s original writing with a few added scenes. This movie was made in black and white, but does a great job of adding many cinematic techniques to communicate a meaning and produce certain emotions. Cinematic techniques help to communicate things that may otherwise be hard to communicate with a black and white production. In this reflection I will discuss the main differences between the writing and the film, how the lighting of characters helps to portray them in certain ways, the establishing shot of the moor and its importance, and the sound of the hound. The first thing to discuss is the main differences between the writing by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle and the movie directed by Sidney Lanfield. The first thing noticed different in the movie is that the notice of a recently escaped convict is never mentioned. A second thing noticed different in the movie is that the note warning Sir Henry to not go to the moor was thrown into his buggy on his way to the hotel. In the writing, …show more content…

Diegetic sound is the sound source that is visible on the screen or is implied to be present by the action of the film. The sound of a hound barking is the opening while Sir Charles is running, and it is used many other times throughout the film. The diegetic sound adds a bit of spookiness to the film. This sound also helps individuals like Holmes and Watson come to the conclusion there really is some type of animal out there that may or may not be the killer. This sound is very important when it comes to the beginning of the movie, because a hound living in the Moor is considered just a myth until Holmes investigates and comes to his final

Open Document