Federalist No. 10 Summary
analytical Essay
438 words
Federalist Paper No. 10, written by James Madison, was published on November 22, 1787. The purpose of the paper was to address the issue of factions and whether or not a large republic is the best means of fighting them. The objection that this paper was trying to address that a strong, united republic would be best to guard against those rather than small, individual republics. This paper is organized by James Madison explaining the different “methods of curing the mischiefs of faction” with a strong union. This paper does fit into a larger series of Federalist Papers. It fits in the larger series because like the other papers, it promotes the ratification of the United States Constitution. The way that the papers promote it is by going in-depth of the promises made by the constitution. The basic argument to Federalist Paper No. 10 is that a “well-constructed Union” is most accurate to “break and control the violence of faction.” Madison clarifies that factions can be alarming to a democratic government. An example of this would be Shay’s Rebellion. With a strong central government, factions will not be threatening to the government. …show more content…
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes the federalist paper no. 10, written by james madison, which addressed the issue of factions and whether or not a large republic is the best means of fighting them.
- Analyzes how this paper is organized by james madison explaining the different methods of curing the mischiefs of faction with a strong union. it fits into the larger series of federalist papers because it promotes the ratification of the united states constitution.
- Explains that madison clarifies that factions can be alarming to a democratic government. shay's rebellion illustrates this.
- Explains the constitutional principles addressed in the paper are popular sovereignty, federalism, and republicanism.
- Explains that federalist paper no. 10 is relevant today because factions still exist. factions today are mostly special interest groups because they have connections to representatives, which other people don't.
- Explains that the framers were right when they envisioned through federalism more government would mean less government because there is an effective limitation on the government.
Popular sovereignty is located where Madison writes that a factions is “a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or a minority of the whole, who are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adversed to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community.” Federalism is included because aim behind the Federalist Papers was to spread the idea of federalism, and that the states and the nation would be best to govern the people. And finally, republicanism is located where Madison composes “we behold a republican remedy for the diseases most incident to republican
Related
- analytical
- opinion
- Federalist #10analytical essayMadison begins perhaps the most famous of the Federalist papers by stating that one of the strongest arguments in favor of the Constitution is the fact that it establishes a government capable of controlling the violence and damage caused by factions. Madison defines that factions are groups of people who gather together to protect and promote their special economic interests and political opinions. Although these factions are at odds with each other, they frequently work against the public interests, and infringe upon the rights of others.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that madison's federalist paper argues that the constitution establishes a government capable of controlling the violence and damage caused by factions.
- Explains that both supporters and opponents of the plan are concerned with the political instability produced by rival factions.
- Explains that factions are inevitable due to the unequal distribution of property. men of greater ability and talent possess more property than those of lesser ability.
- Explains madison's view that there are only two ways to control a faction: destroy liberty or give every citizen the same opinions, passions, and interests.
- Explains that direct democracies cannot control factious conflicts because the strongest and largest faction dominates, and there is no way to protect weak factions against an obnoxious individual or a strong majority.
- Argues that madison hopes that the men elected to office will be wise and good men the best of america. theoretically, those who govern should be the least likely to sacrifice the public good to temporary condition.
- Opines that in large republics, factions will be numerous, but weaker than in small, direct democracies where it is easier to consolidate their strength.
- Explains that the constitution's immediate object is to bring the present thirteen states into a secure union. the states farthest from the center of the country will be most endangered by foreign countries.
- Analyzes how madison concludes that he presents thee previous arguments to convince those who will not listen to those 'prophets of gloom' who say that the proposed government is unworkable.
935 wordsRead More - Examples Of The Federalist Paper And Government Todayanalytical essayIn The Federalist Papers by James Madison, Madison discuses various aspects of government and how the government must be organized in order to better represent the people. In The Federalist, No. 10 Madison discusses the nature of political factions and parties and how they can affect the government and its practices. The Federalist, No. 51 discusses instead how the government being in branches helps maintain liberties and better protect the American people. The topics mentioned in The Federalist Papers continue to explain and structure our government today.
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how madison's the federalist papers explains various aspects of government and how it must be organized to better represent the people. madison discusses the nature of political factions and parties.
- Analyzes how madison states that a well-constructed union must control and break apart factions that may manipulate or prevent the passing of proper legislature or government controls.
- Analyzes how madison states that latent causes of faction are sown in the nature of man, and that the government must be fit to handle them and keep them from gaining control over legislature.
- Analyzes how madison explains the purpose of having multiple branches of government and how it protects the people.
- Analyzes how madison's federalists papers inspire and explain our government today and how it functions.
- Analyzes how madison's federalist papers have an influence on our government and how it functions today.
1034 wordsRead More - Federalist #10analytical essayIn “Federalist #10”, Madison describes the dangerous effects that factions can have on Republican government and on its people. Madison defines a faction as a group of citizens who unite under a shared cause, and work against other groups in order to achieve their means. Their means of achieving their goals may achieve adverse effects upon the rights of other citizens. Put in more modern terms, a faction could be reasonably compared to a special-interest group. The sort of faction that most endangers the liberty inherent in United States society are factions that contain a majority of the whole. The weakness of a popular government is its susceptibility to the effects of factions. However, a well-constructed Union provides numerous advantages, and its ability to break and control factions is its most important and vital to the success of the Union. Factions arise due to the nature of man to be moved by different opinions and passions. Men will be diverse in their opinions as well as their social and economic classes, and just by the mere presence of dividing classes will factions arise. By means of factions, legislative measures are often decided by an overbearing majority, with little or no regard for others who do not share their interests. Protecting against factions will protect those in the minority, and ensure that the public good is served.
In this essay, the author
- Explains madison's definition of a faction, which entails working against other groups to achieve their goals. a well-constructed union provides numerous advantages, and its ability to break and control factions is vital to the success of the union.
- Argues that madison is adamant about the dangers of pure democracy and the negatives it poses when faced by factions.
- Explains that a pure democracy is better-suited to be extended over the "greater sphere of country". madison holds that there are two options in curing the effects of factions.
- Explains that madison proposes that the effects of factions must be controlled, and the best way to do this is to create a large republic.
870 wordsRead More - Pluralismanalytical essayIn Federalist No. 10, James Madison stresses that “measures are too often decided, not according to the rules of justice and the rights of the minor party, but by the superior force of an interested and overbearing majority.” Madison philosophized that a large republic, composed of numerous factions capable of competing with each other and the majority must exist in order to avoid tyranny of majority rule.# When Federalist No. 10 was published, the concept of pluralism was not widely used. However, the political theory that is the foundation for United States government was the influential force behind pluralism and its doctrines.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that many critics believe that faction representation is biased in favor of wealthy corporations and affluent individuals. schattschneider claims that the heavenly chorus sings with an upper-class accent.
- Analyzes how madison and the other founding fathers envisioned a country with political freedom and opportunity for every citizen. they hoped that america would avoid tyranny brought by an overwhelming majority.
- Analyzes how texas republican larry combest criticizes the bush administration for turning down the republican farm bill.
- Explains the concept of pluralism in federalist no. 10, which focuses on shared power among interest groups and competing factions.
- Analyzes how the bush administration felt that not enough money would be spent on the environment. pluralism is a large aspect of the united states' political system.
- Cites becker, elizabeth, evans, graham, hewnham, jeffrey, kernell, samuel, and gary c. jacobson, the logic of american politics.
1378 wordsRead More - Bill of Rights To Protect From Tyrannyanalytical essaySupporters of the Constitution called themselves Federalists, a name referring to a balance of power between the states and the national government. They argued for a federal system as in the Constitution. James Madison claimed that the Constitution was less dangerous that it looked because the separation of powers protected people from tyrannical abuse. The Federalists compile a group of essays, known as The Federalist Papers. In No. 51, Madison insisted that the division of powers and they system of checks an balances would protect Americans from the tyranny of centralized authority. He wrote that opposite motives among government office holders were good, and was one of the advantages of a big government with different demographics. In No. 10, he said that there was no need to fear factions, for not enough power would be given to the faction forming people; thus, they wouldn't become tyrannical. Hamilton, in No. 84, defended the Constitution with the case that the Constitution can be amended by representatives, who are there to represent the citizens' interests.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the new born nation was divided into two political sides, the federalists and the anti-federalists, over the ratification of the constitution.
- Analyzes how the ratification of the new constitution sparked a national debate. people expected the convention to amend the articles of confederation, fearing regressing back into tyranny.
- Analyzes how the federalists argued for a federal system as in the constitution. madison claimed that the separation of powers protected people from tyrannical abuse.
- Explains that the anti-federalists were weary of placing great power in a single point of execution because it would go against the idealistic point.
- Explains that the anti-federalists' demand for a bill of rights stemmed from their fear of strong central government. the first ten amendments to the constitution comprised the bill of rights.
- Explains that the constitution was ratified only after the bill of rights was promised to the people.
768 wordsRead More - What Is Madison's Argument In Federalist 10analytical essaySummary & Analysis of Federalist #10 Analysis: James Madison carried to the Convention a plan that was the exact opposite of Hamilton's. In fact, the theory he advocated at Philadelphia and in his Federalist essays was developed as a republican substitute for the New Yorker's "high toned" scheme of state. Madison was convinced that the class struggle would be ameliorated in America by establishing a limited federal government that would make functional use of the vast size of the country and the existence of the sates as active political organisms. He argued in his "Notes on Confederacy," in his Convention speeches, and again in Federalist 10 that if an extended republic was set up including a multiplicity of economic, geographic, social, religious, and sectional interests, these interests, by checking each other, would prevent American society from being divided into the clashing armies of the rich and the poor. Thus, if no interstate proletariat could become organized on purely economic
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how madison's plan was a republican substitute for the new yorkers' "high toned" scheme of state. he believed that the class struggle would be ameliorated in america by establishing limited federal government.
- Explains that james madison was the most creative and philosophical disciple of the scottish school of science and politics in the philadelphia convention. his effectiveness as an advocate of a new constitution was based in large part on his personal experience in public life.
- Analyzes how david hume's "idea of a perfect commonwealth" inspired james madison to think about factions.
- Analyzes how madison's theory of the extended republic was based on hume’s essay.
- Analyzes how hume and madison summed up the eighteenth century's most profound thought on political parties.
1282 wordsRead More - Influence of the Founding Fathersopinion essayIn the Federalist Papers, there was a great concern for Factions. Factions are a political group that has one single major aim. They can be very powerful; which could be a positive and a negative thing depending on the goal they are trying to achieve. A fear that factions could actually control the government made the founding fathers uneasy. The Constitution did not support factions but could not abolish them either, because it would go against the liberty of citizens. Madison also did not support factions as he states in Federalist 10 that “The public good is often disregarded in the conflicts of rival parties”. Either way factions had to stay because abolishing factions meant abolishing liberty.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the federalist papers were important building blocks that helped us become the great nation that we are now.
- Explains that in the federalist papers, there was a great concern for factions. a fear that factions could actually control the government made the founding fathers uneasy.
- Explains that the founding fathers would not see a problem with factions, since now we have strong central government.
- Explains that the constitution urged for a division of power, first between the state government and the federal government, and also between its three branches.
- Opines that checks and balances are still applicable and in effect today. the system allowed each of the three sections to have a say in each other's ability to exercise and authority.
- Explains that the three-fifths compromise was an agreement between southern and northern states made during 1787, during which the united states was established.
- Explains that the three-fifths compromise was lifted in 1865 right after the american civil war. america's greatest achievement was the abolishing slavery.
- Analyzes how madison and hamilton talked about how important energy is in a good government. an energetic government protects the community, the country, and private property.
- Opines that even though some ideas the founding fathers fabricated were not in effect today, they helped america grow the way it is now.
977 wordsRead More - Federalist 10analytical essayFederalist 10 Liberty. This word means many things to many people. There is no way to distinctly define the term without leaving someone's crucial point of view out of the equation. One person might say that anarchy would be the only way to have complete and utter freedom, while others would go as far as to believe a controlled communist government is the best route to achieving liberation. Factions (a group of people who agree on certain topics) are inevitable, due to the nature of man.
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how the term "liberty" means many things to many people. james madison summed up factions eloquently in federalist #10. power is distributed in a checks and balance format.
- Analyzes james madison's political prediction that the united states being so large and having such a wide variety of interests could guarantee fairness and constancy under the new constitution.
- Explains james madison's explicit view on american political culture. everyone in america, from the time they were born, has been placed into factions. students select the student council members by having fellow classmates sign the petition form.
- Opines that liberty gives americans their freedom. the government that madison set up through the constitution allows us to belong to different groups and still have our rights and beliefs protected.
729 wordsRead More - Socratic Circle Essayanalytical essayJames Madison, "Federalist #10," in The Federalist Papers, ed. Clinton Rossiter (New York: New American Library, 1961), pp 77-84
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes the destructive and counterintuitive ideas of factions to a democracy in james madison's "the federalist no. 10".
- Argues that the creation of factions, self-interest groups, creates both majority and minority groups — the common good is hidden behind interests of majority groups with fixed aims.
- Analyzes how factions create debate and argument, but they fail to recognize the natural law of human's self-centeredness.
- Argues that the government system must maintain balance between the extremes of total factional or plutocratic dominance.
- Explains that factions pose a threat to democracy and its associated ideals. this notion is proven through the overpowering of the minority by the majority, in which the opinions of certain groups are silenced and amplified.
849 wordsRead More - Madison vs. Marshallanalytical essayIn Madison’s work of Federalist No. 10, he identifies factions were a problem. He views them as “a dangerous vice”, but at the same time saw factions as a necessary evil. He mentions that “The regulation of these various and interfering interest forms the principal task of modern legislation; and involves the spirit of party and faction in the necessary and ordinary operations of government.” Here Madison states that factions, opposed in spirit to democratic ideals, spreading “unsteadiness and injustice” which are actually necessary for the function of a representative government. Throughout his paper, Madison explains how pure democracy wouldn’t be able to work, because it had “no cure for the mischief of faction.” He believed that this type of government will give so much power to the majority that it was doomed to fail. He sounded very confident that the new constitution would work. He believed of having a representative and a republic system. He had no doubt in mind that new constitution would be the end of the states embarrassment to the world. Madison saw democracy not as an ideal but something that could be modified to be fitted.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that madison and marshall's points of view differed from one another, and that the political landscape was different.
- Analyzes how madison identifies factions as a problem in federalist no. 10. he believes that pure democracy wouldn't work because it had no cure for the mischief of faction.
- Opines that marshall was erroneous by not accepting the constitutional celebration.
640 wordsRead More