Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Fate vs free will Romeo and Juliet
Fate vs free will Romeo and Juliet
Hamlet and fate
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Fate vs free will Romeo and Juliet
The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark concludes like a tragedy: with many of the main characters dead. Queen Gertrude drinks from a poisoned glass, Laertes and Hamlet stab each other with a poisoned sword, and Hamlet finally kills King Claudius and avenges his father by both stabbing the king with the sword and forcing him to drink out of the poisonous glass. Horatio, after witnessing the death of his friend Hamlet, attempts to commit suicide by drinking out of the glass, but Hamlet stops him and convinces him to stay alive to fulfill one last duty: to tell the story to the incoming army that led to the gruesome scene. Fortinbras enters the scene, mentioning that Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are dead while trying to absorb the scene in front of him. Horatio tells him the story of what happened, and Hamlet is carried off the scene “like a solder to the stage” (Ham. 5.2.442). Here, Shakespeare’s tragedy concludes. However, many questions arise from this last scene, and the entire tragedy in general. It seemed as if Hamlet, the king, and Laertes were all planning to meet up at the castle, but was fate a part of the end result? Were their deaths predestined? Was fate the reason they came together in the first place? How important of a role did …show more content…
Many people argue “against thinking and theories that emphasize only ‘meaningless’ chance and mere probabilities” (Solomon). There is an idealistic standard that says that everything has to have an explanation, “a purpose behind [its] existence” (Solomon). However, in the end, the general society is more worried about what the future holds rather than who is controlling the future, like God or fate. The role that fate plays today isn’t imperative, nor is it something on which all people have to unanimously agree. It is simply a part of the universal story in which we carry on our daily lives:
It is primal instinct for humans to say they understand what something means, even if they have never heard of it before. Take the word mortality, for example, news reporters and journalists are constantly saying it, but ask a viewer what it means and they will stumble. William Shakespeare however, understood mortality very well and was quite fond of using the word as a motif in many of his plays, especially so in Hamlet. By using direct references to disease and illness, an unweeded garden, and rotting and decay, Shakespeare’s Hamlet illustrates how death and corruption run rampant in the helpless state of Denmark while under the rule of Claudius.
In the play Hamlet by William Shakespeare, Hamlet the king of Denmark is murdered by his brother, Claudius, and as a ghost tells his son, Hamlet the prince of Denmark, to avenge him by killing his brother. The price Hamlet does agree to his late father’s wishes, and undertakes the responsibility of killing his uncle, Claudius. However even after swearing to his late father, and former king that he would avenge him; Hamlet for the bulk of the play takes almost no action against Claudius. Prince Hamlet in nature is a man of thought throughout the entirety of the play; even while playing mad that is obvious, and although this does seem to keep him alive, it is that same trait that also keeps him from fulfilling his father’s wish for vengeance
“The very conveyances of his lands will scarcely lie in this box, and must th’ inheritor himself have no more, ha?” Hamlet’s realization in 5.1.88 is one of great weight and resulted in more deep thought on the concept of death. Throughout Shakespeare’s “Hamlet” the subject is deeply considered and consistent breakthroughs and new realizations are revealed through Hamlet’s character. The primary evolution of Hamlet’s understanding stands with the coping, dealing with the finality of death, conflicts with morality and revenge in its intimate relationship with death as it applies to Hamlet.
Death is an eternal mystery and the most controversial subject stemming from human inexperience. Its inescapability and uncertainty can give insights on the core principles and vulnerability of human nature. In Shakespeare’s tragedy Hamlet he skilfully makes use of death as a lashing force to explore the depths of his characters along the way illustrating man’s continual dilemma “To be or not to be”?
William Shakespeare takes us through the life of Hamlet, the Prince of Denmark battling through the death of his father, and seeking revenge on the man who murdered him, in his tragedy that is, Hamlet. Shakespeare creates a world fixated on life versus death that is constantly questioning the possibilities of the afterlife and comparing it to their present circumstances. As death surrounds Denmark, the idea of suicide rises and becomes a significant theme that encourages characterization and plot development throughout the play. Hamlet, distraught by the death of his father and the recent marriage of his mother, Gertrude to his uncle, Claudius, begins contemplating whether suicide is the right choice for him in his situation. Death also takes over the mind of Ophelia, a beautiful young lady who Hamlet is in love with, when her father Polonius is murdered, leading to her madness and eventual suicide. The final suicide is the death of the entire royal circle caused by their own corrupt conflicts and actions. Shakespeare explores the idea of suicide as an important theme through the imagination and actions of his characters.
Even though Hamlet is a prince, he has little control over the course of his life. In that time many things were decided for the princes and princesses such as their education and even who they married. This was more or less the normal way of life for a child of the monarch. But in the case of Hamlet, any of the control he thought he had, fell away with the murder of his father. Having his father, the king, be killed by his own brother, sent Hamlet into a state of feeling helpless and out of control. Cooped up in a palace with no real outlet, he tries to control at least one aspect of his life. Hamlet deliberately toys with Ophelia's emotions in order to feel in control of something since he cannot control the situation with Claudius.
We’re all going to die right? Then why is it that we fear death so much? In William Shakespeare’s well-known tragic play, Hamlet, the reader views Hamlet’s attitude towards death evolve. Shakespeare proves that Hamlet’s attitude towards death develops throughout the play; he starts off desiring death, then is fearful of death, and finally is confident about death.
Defined by the Greek philosopher Aristotle, a tragic hero, in literature, is the main character in a story or piece of writing who has one flaw that brings them to their demise. In William Shakespeare 's play Hamlet, throughout the tragedy there is one character above all the others that fits the part of a tragic hero. The misfortunate protagonist, Prince Hamlet of Denmark who constantly shows the viewers his flaw of procrastination and which ultimately leads him and many other characters to their unfortunate and preventable death.
The play, Hamlet, by William Shakespeare, shows human nature to be greedy, self-involved and vengeful. Claudius is driven by his greed to commit murder. Polonius is always looking out for himself, currying favor at the expense of anyone in his way. Hamlet thinks only of vengeance from the moment he finds out about Claudius murdering his father. Human nature has been all of these things, but it has also evolved through the ages. We can be base and cruel, but we can also show great compassion and kindness.
Fate seems to defy humanity at every turn. A man may have his life planned out to the last second, but then some random force intervenes and he dies the second after he has completed his life plan. Some believe in fate, believing that our lives are predetermined from the moment we are born. Other people believe that everything is random, the result of some god rolling the dice in a universal poker game. Still other people believe that each and every person is in total control of his or her destiny, every step of the way. Who is to say which viewpoint is false? Every culture has a unique perception of the role of fate in our lives, and no group has the "right answer," simply a different answer. Taking into consideration the views of other cultures can help an individual refine his personal viewpoint on this inconceivable subject.
Shakespeare’s Elizabethan revenge-tragedy Hamlet (1602) strikes to the core of what it means to be human; the struggle between internal and external circumstances in the search for a cohesive sense of identity. Hamlet’s attempt to navigate the tensions between Renaissance Humanism and Christian Providence evokes an ontological search for meaning. Mirroring the anxieties of Shakespeare’s bleak world, the corruption of the social state and Hamlet’s loyalty to his father compels him to take decisive vengeance. However, these aspirations are deeply entwined with moral dilemmas as he tries to reconcile his duty and extreme passion with a propensity for thought and a valuing of truth. The ensuing internal instability halts Hamlet’s search for these
The first source that I have found on Shakespeare's play Hamlet is a website called Spark Notes. This non credible source off of the free web provides a summary of information on Shakespeare's play Hamlet. This website does not provide detailed information, it gives a very basic overview of the play. If you were to read the information on Spark Notes with out reading Hamlet, you wouldn't be able to receive most of the details that are in the play. The second source that I have found is an article from the library database's literature research center called, 'Hamlets Ordeals.'
rotten in the state of Denmark." The characters of the play know that there are
It was my observation after reading Hamlet, that the play and its main character are not typical examples of tragedy and contain a questionable "tragic flaw" in the tragic hero. I chose this topic because Hamlet is a tragedy, but one that is very different from classical tragedies such as Medea. I also found quite a lot of controversial debate over the play and its leading character. While reading through my notes, I found that, according to Aristotle, "the tragic hero will most effectively evoke both our pity and terror if he is neither thoroughly good nor evil but a mixture of both; and also that the tragic effect will be stronger if the hero is better than we are in the sense that he is of higher than ordinary moral worth. Such a man is exhibited as suffering a change in fortune from happiness to misery because of a mistaken act, to which he is led by his hamartia ("error of judgment") or his tragic flaw." It is important that this be clear, because I plan to demonstrate how Shakespeare makes Hamlet an atypical tragedy to begin with, and how controversial an issue Hamlet's tragic flaw is.
There are many reasons why Hamlet had his downfall. One being his decision to keeping the murder of his father a secret. Another one being the betrayals of his closest friends. Perhaps if Guildenstern or Rosencrantz had been there for Hamlet, to rely and place trust upon, he might not had to fell so alone. A little sympathy from his girlfriend Ophelia, and even his mother Gertrude would have been nice as well. Unfortunately Ophelia is held back from Hamlet, due to her father. Gertrude marries his uncle Claudius, who is responsible for his fathers death, and is looking to kill him next. And Guildenstern and Rosencrantz are ordered by Claudius to spy on Hamlet, and betray him as a friend.