Analysis Of The Omnivore's Obesity Issue

1572 Words4 Pages

A More Practical Approach to Solve U.S Obesity Issue
Wholesome food or processed food? People always face this food selection problem in daily life. Michael Pollan promotes the wholesome-food movement as a solution to address obesity issue in his book The Omnivore’s Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals. However, the author of the article “How Junk Food Can End Obesity”, David H. Freedman holds different perspective in which he thinks reducing calories in processed food to make it healthier should be the feasible approach instead to solve the U.S obesity problems. Freedman raises several objections towards Pollan’s argument. Most noticeably to me, Freedman points out that it is impossible to fully eat wholesome food and eliminate eating processed food in daily life which he uses to object to the practicality of
He thinks government intervention as Pollan mentioned in his book will not work. However, I think government intervention such as setting up regulations or promoting public education will exert a positive effect on altering U.S eating habits thus further reducing the obesity rate. From Dhruv Khullar’s essay “Why Shame Won’t Stop Obesity”, he depicts the fact which is over 75 percent Americans are overweight or obese, and even shame won’t stop them from eating unhealthy food (128). Khullar proposes we should minimize junk food advertising and instituting nutrition and health curriculums into public schools (129). Minimizing junk food advertising will decrease the chance people buying junk food and public education could let people, especially children, aware of the negative long term consequences of obesity. Government role is especially crucial to ensure those propositions could be executed and reduce the consumption of food causing

Open Document