Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Marriage in decline
Changing family structure and impact in our society
Changing family structure and impact in our society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Marriage in decline
The implication for social policy as a result of the changing face of
the ‘family’ has been enormous. In order to evaluate them
adequately, I shall look at 4 main transitory factors which have had,
and are continuing to have, implications for social policy,
specifically within Europe. These are: Downward trend in marriages,
the rise in single parent/lone parent families, increasing
participation of women in the workforce and their consequent
economical success, and the incessantly declining rate of fertility.
The notion of family thirty years ago was relatively simple. A
married couple, two children, an extended family in the form of
grandparents and even a pet were seen as constituting the norm. One
of the main factors that influenced the fragmentation of this image,
in Britain at least, was the introduction of The Divorce Reform Act in
1969 (Glennester, pg 163). The immediate period after the introduction
of this law, brought on by considerable pressure from feminists in the
1960s period of liberalism, witnessed a sudden influx in the number of
women abandoning their marriages in search of bigger and better
things. Married couples were increasingly becoming separate
entities, and, over time, this pattern has altered to an extent that
marriage is now losing its hold as an important social institution.
Lewis (1992 In: Glennester Howard:British Social Policy since 1945 pp
164) made use of the Male Breadwinning Model to depict the belief
system upon which social policies were initially formed; women were
dependent upon the male, unlikely to participate in the labour work
force after marriage and likely to remain in the domest...
... middle of paper ...
...ng policies. The rising irregularities in family
life can also be seen as a result of the contradictions
within existing policies. Whereas on the one hand the state urges its
members to show increasing participation in the labour force, it also
encourages the maintenance of the traditional notions of 'family.'
This requires females to remain at home and men to dominate in the
financial domain, a lifestyle which is unlikely; financial
requirements of raising children are now are so high that it
needs dual work, which in turn increases individualisation, one
primary reason the state is in a frenzy with regards to childcare.
What is required is a balance between the two variations; the
traditional and the new, but whether social policy can incorporate
the new 'fluctuating' family into it's make up remains to be seen.
Chapter 10 of Teresa Ciabattari book Sociology of families talks about the social policy and the future of families. The chapter starts by giving the readers a brief review of what we have learned so far in chapters 1-9. The chapter discusses the different approaches to what a family is and the changes of what the meaning of family is in the united states. The propose of the chapter is to get a better understanding of the book’s ideas yet to also see what the types of impacts they’ll have in our future society. The chapter is spilt into many categories such as Defining family, family change, family continuity, family diversity, inequality and social policy; housing policy and family inequality, state welfare policy and family, and so forth.
She began to explain that both married and unmarried couples have an increased chance of experiencing poverty after the relationships ends. The goal of the MPA as well as family law is focused on the redistribution of economic resources of the family. L’Heureux-Dube understand that failing to recognize contributions made by unmarried couples, they are not getting the respect they deserve. Secondly, she goes on to discuss the decrease in marriage and increase in “common law.” “The reality of modern society dictates a richer understanding of the various forms of familial relations in this country and the shedding of the idea that family life is reserved to one particular conception of what is deemed to be an acceptable family model.” Therefore, there are different family form that can be found within an unmarried cohabitation. If we fail to recognize this ongoing trend and do not provide the benefits then we are discriminating against these individuals. She concludes to say that married and unmarried couples share many similarities the only difference is the contract that the coupled entered
finally the opportune moment for individuals to build a stable family that previous decades of depression, war, and domestic conflicts had restricted. We see that this decade began with a considerable drop in divorce rates and rise in marriage rates, which is often assumed as the result of changed attitudes and values. However, this situation cannot be only just attributed to women’s
Perhaps the area that has changed the most for Scottish women in the last century is the family and the home. In the first half of the century the norm was for the woman of the house to "service" the male breadwinners within the home and family and to reproduce as their primary roles in life. This included many tasks including preparing meals for the whole family, looking after the family budget (It was usual for the husband to give his wife his pay packet at the end of the week and she would use it to pay the bills and buy the food.) as well as cleaning the house and the doing the whole family's washing, which all together usually equated to (or more than) full time work.
Cohabitation, over the last two decades has gone from being a relatively uncommon social phenomenon to a commonplace one and has achieved this prominence quite quickly. A few sets of numbers convey both the change and its rapidity. The percentage of marriages preceded by cohabitation rose from about 10% for those marrying between 1965 and 1974 to over 50% for those marrying between 1990 and 1994 (Bumpass and Lu 1999, Bumpass & Sweet 1989); the percentage is even higher for remarriages. Secondly, the percentage of women in their late 30s who report having cohabited at least once rose from 30% in 1987 to 48% in 1995. Given a mere eight year tome window, this is a striking increase. Finally, the proportion of all first unions (including both marriages and cohabitation) that begin as cohabitations rose from 46% for unions formed between 1980 and 1984 to almost 60% for those formed between 1990 and 1994 (Bumpass and Lu 1999).
Warren Farrell is a well educated man who focuses his attention on gender. In his essay “Men as Success Objects,” he writes about gender roles in male-female relationships. He begins, “for thousands of years, marriages were about economic security and survival” (Farrell 185). The key word in that statement is were. This implies the fact that marriage has changed in the last century. He relates the fact that post 1950s, marriage was more about what the male and female were getting out of the relationship rather than just the security of being married. Divorce rates grew and added to the tension of which gender held the supremacy and which role the individuals were supposed to accept. “Inequality in the workplace” covered up all of the conflicts involved with the “inequality in the homeplace”(Farrell). Farrell brings to attention all ...
Family structure and stability have constantly evolved and been researched in aspects of sociology. Following World War II, the family ideology in the 1950’s was brought to the attention of Talcott Parsons and Robert Bales (1955) whom demonstrated how transitioning from an agricultural society to that of an industrialization one played an important role in altering family life and structure. Parsons and Bales further expressed how gender role specialization was vital in the continuous of family solidarity. The “instrumental” male father role as the leader of the family responsible for providing the income and support as the “expressive” role which is that of the female mother delivers her contribution to the family through house work and nurture
Marriage is the legal or formally recognized union of a man and a woman, or two people or the same sex as partners in a relationship. Marriage rates in the United States have changed drastically since the last 90’s and early 2000 years (Cherlin 2004). Marital decline perspective and marital resilience perspective are the two primary perspectives and which we believe are the results from the decline. The marital decline perspective is the view that the American culture has become increasingly individualistic and preoccupied with personal happiness (Amato, 2004). The change in attitudes has changed the meaning of marriage as a whole, from a formal institution
Divorce is prevalent in many parts of the developed world, it has been estimated that roughly 50% of marriages in America up until the 1980’s ended in divorce (Rutter). Divorce is arguably a personal hardship for both partners and their children, in that the stress of the divorce places both men and women at varying risks of psychological and physical health problems (Hetherington, Stanley-Hagan and Anderson 1989). However, using C. Wright mills’ definition of the “Sociological Imagination” we begin to view divorce as not just a personal problem of a particular man or woman, but as a societal concern that affects a wider category of people at a personal level. Therefore this essay will examine the societal structures which contribute to divorce
There was a time when women typically maintained the home and raised children while the husbands were the sole bread-winners for the family finances. However, times have changed and so have women’s rights and expectations for divorce, education, an...
One of the biggest changes in American families has been divorce and the single-parent families. In the article “What is a Family?”, Pauline Irit Erera argues that after World War 11, is when the major changes in families begun. Women were already accustomed to having jobs and working while their men were away during the war, and when the men all came back is when things started to change. Erera says, “The movement for gender equality led to increased employment opportunities for women, while at the same time declining wage rates for unskilled male workers made them less desirable marriage partners.” (Ere...
Walker, A.H. 1985. "Racial differences in patterns of marriage and family maintenance, 1890-1980." Pp. 87-112 in Feminism, Children, and the New Families, ed. S.M. Dornbusch and M.H. Strober. New York: Guilford Press.
Theories of the Family and Policy. Retrieved February 27, 2011, from New Zealand Treasury: http://www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/research-policy/wp/2004/04-02/11.htm#_toc4.1. Gabler, J. (2010). The 'Standard' of the 'Stand Sociology for the Dummies. Indianapolis, Indiana: Wiley Publishing, Inc.
The family is the main agent of socialisation and an institution. (Giddens, 2013:339). As children, we rely on our family to fulfil basic needs. We all need guidance, and more importantly we also require nurturing to become healthy adults. The definition of family varies across cultures. However, the family is sensitive to change and, therefore, not static. The structure of the family has changed, and culture and society are now more accepting of the fact that people now choose to cohabit, rather than marry. (Haralambos & Holborn 2009:3). In 2013, there were nearly 1.9 million lone parent households with dependent children in the United Kingdom; a figure which has steadily increased over the years (Office of National Statistics 2013). The rise in lone parents has brought about greater acceptance of pregnancies that do not have to involve marriage although acceptance is not the concern. A study suggests that….
In this academic essay I will be focusing and explaining my understanding of the Family Social System, how it interacts with other systems, how it works on the internally, but also on Murray Bowen’s family system theory, concepts and tools he has provided for future therapists in the pursuit to help family systems in crisis, how some of his views are very simular to Erik Erikson’s developmental theory stage effects and can actually mesh quite easily to assist in understanding the human psyche in individuals for both theory’s, finally I will explain briefly on genograms and how this tool can help assist in deciphering repetitive detrimental crisis and anxieties in the family system.